关于奥地利宪法法庭2017年6月14日判决的声明,签名。G62/2017和G62/2017-12、G63/2017-14法案,在先前法律情况下重新生效

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.31268/ps.2022.119
Edyta Tkaczyk
{"title":"关于奥地利宪法法庭2017年6月14日判决的声明,签名。G62/2017和G62/2017-12、G63/2017-14法案,在先前法律情况下重新生效","authors":"Edyta Tkaczyk","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitutional Court has ruled on the lapse of the provision and on its re-entry into the legal system. According to § 4(3) of the ruling G62/2017 ua G62/2017-12, G63/2017-14 the expression “and 3” in § 16(5) of the law of financing political parties (LGBl 79/1981, idFLGBl 7/2017), should be repealed as unconstitutional due to a violation of the principle of equality before the law which also binds the legislator. These provisions illustrate the status of the law, as they were part of the legal system for some time and could be properly applied by public authorities. The ruling was issued on 14 June 2017 and concerns the re-entry into force of the previous legal status. However the Court emphasized that this matter should be regulated by the legislator of the Land of Salzburg. Regardless of the actions taken by the law-makers, the Constitutional Court had to deliver a judgement that is in accordance with the logical principle elaborated on the basis of Article 140(6) of the Austrian Constitution (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz).","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glosa do Wyroku austriackiego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 14 czerwca 2017 r., sygn. akt G62/2017 ua G62/2017-12, G63/2017-14, stwierdzająca ponowne wejście w życie uprzedniego stanu prawnego\",\"authors\":\"Edyta Tkaczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.31268/ps.2022.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Constitutional Court has ruled on the lapse of the provision and on its re-entry into the legal system. According to § 4(3) of the ruling G62/2017 ua G62/2017-12, G63/2017-14 the expression “and 3” in § 16(5) of the law of financing political parties (LGBl 79/1981, idFLGBl 7/2017), should be repealed as unconstitutional due to a violation of the principle of equality before the law which also binds the legislator. These provisions illustrate the status of the law, as they were part of the legal system for some time and could be properly applied by public authorities. The ruling was issued on 14 June 2017 and concerns the re-entry into force of the previous legal status. However the Court emphasized that this matter should be regulated by the legislator of the Land of Salzburg. Regardless of the actions taken by the law-makers, the Constitutional Court had to deliver a judgement that is in accordance with the logical principle elaborated on the basis of Article 140(6) of the Austrian Constitution (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宪法法院已就该条款的失效及其重新纳入法律制度作出裁决。根据裁决G62/2017、G62/2017-12、G63/2017-14第4(3)条,《政党融资法》(LGBl 79/1981, idFLGBl 7/2017)第16(5)条中“and 3”的表述违反了法律面前人人平等的原则,应被视为违宪而废除,该原则对立法者也具有约束力。这些规定说明了法律的地位,因为它们在一段时间内是法律制度的一部分,可以由公共当局适当地适用。该裁决于2017年6月14日发布,涉及先前法律地位的重新生效。然而,法院强调,这一事项应由萨尔茨堡州的立法者加以管理。无论立法者采取何种行动,宪法法院都必须根据奥地利《宪法》(bundeses - verfassungsgesetz)第140(6)条所阐述的逻辑原则作出判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Glosa do Wyroku austriackiego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 14 czerwca 2017 r., sygn. akt G62/2017 ua G62/2017-12, G63/2017-14, stwierdzająca ponowne wejście w życie uprzedniego stanu prawnego
The Constitutional Court has ruled on the lapse of the provision and on its re-entry into the legal system. According to § 4(3) of the ruling G62/2017 ua G62/2017-12, G63/2017-14 the expression “and 3” in § 16(5) of the law of financing political parties (LGBl 79/1981, idFLGBl 7/2017), should be repealed as unconstitutional due to a violation of the principle of equality before the law which also binds the legislator. These provisions illustrate the status of the law, as they were part of the legal system for some time and could be properly applied by public authorities. The ruling was issued on 14 June 2017 and concerns the re-entry into force of the previous legal status. However the Court emphasized that this matter should be regulated by the legislator of the Land of Salzburg. Regardless of the actions taken by the law-makers, the Constitutional Court had to deliver a judgement that is in accordance with the logical principle elaborated on the basis of Article 140(6) of the Austrian Constitution (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Nowa Zelandia: Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 listopada 2022 r. w sprawie Make It 16 Incorporated vs. Attorney-General (dotyczący wieku uprawniającego do głosowania w wyborach), sygn. akt SC 14/2022 Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału Posłanka Wanda Ładzina (1880–1966) i jej działalność w Polsce i we Francji Uczestnictwo Sejmu i Senatu w procedurze kontroli przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności a przyszłość parlamentów narodowych w procesach decyzyjnych Unii Europejskiej Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1