陪审员在民主法治司法中的作用。有争议的文章

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.31268/ps.2022.161
Michał Grudecki
{"title":"陪审员在民主法治司法中的作用。有争议的文章","authors":"Michał Grudecki","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to present the role of lay judges in the judicial system, taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of this institution as well as specific principles resulting from the principle of a democratic state of law. The article also assesses the introduction of the lay judge institution to the Supreme Court and presents de lege ferenda postulates regarding the improvement of the functioning of this institution as a form of social factor participation in court proceedings. It was also considered to what extent judges – including lay judges – have an influence on making the law. The conducted research is mainly based on Michał Kaczmarczyk’s monograph on this issue, which makes the text partly of a polemic nature.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O roli ławników w sprawowaniu wymiaru sprawiedliwości w demokratycznym państwie prawa. Artykuł polemiczny\",\"authors\":\"Michał Grudecki\",\"doi\":\"10.31268/ps.2022.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to present the role of lay judges in the judicial system, taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of this institution as well as specific principles resulting from the principle of a democratic state of law. The article also assesses the introduction of the lay judge institution to the Supreme Court and presents de lege ferenda postulates regarding the improvement of the functioning of this institution as a form of social factor participation in court proceedings. It was also considered to what extent judges – including lay judges – have an influence on making the law. The conducted research is mainly based on Michał Kaczmarczyk’s monograph on this issue, which makes the text partly of a polemic nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是介绍非专业法官在司法制度中的作用,同时考虑到这一制度的优点和缺点以及民主法治国家原则所产生的具体原则。本文还评估了将非专业法官机构引入最高法院的情况,并提出了关于改进这一机构作为社会因素参与法院诉讼的一种形式的职能的法律上的全民公决的假设。还审议了法官- -包括非专业法官- -在何种程度上对法律的制定有影响。所进行的研究主要基于米夏沃夫·卡兹马契克关于这个问题的专著,这使得文本部分具有论战性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O roli ławników w sprawowaniu wymiaru sprawiedliwości w demokratycznym państwie prawa. Artykuł polemiczny
The aim of the article is to present the role of lay judges in the judicial system, taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of this institution as well as specific principles resulting from the principle of a democratic state of law. The article also assesses the introduction of the lay judge institution to the Supreme Court and presents de lege ferenda postulates regarding the improvement of the functioning of this institution as a form of social factor participation in court proceedings. It was also considered to what extent judges – including lay judges – have an influence on making the law. The conducted research is mainly based on Michał Kaczmarczyk’s monograph on this issue, which makes the text partly of a polemic nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Nowa Zelandia: Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 listopada 2022 r. w sprawie Make It 16 Incorporated vs. Attorney-General (dotyczący wieku uprawniającego do głosowania w wyborach), sygn. akt SC 14/2022 Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału Posłanka Wanda Ładzina (1880–1966) i jej działalność w Polsce i we Francji Uczestnictwo Sejmu i Senatu w procedurze kontroli przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności a przyszłość parlamentów narodowych w procesach decyzyjnych Unii Europejskiej Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1