刑法确立过程中的法无明文罪推定及其(非)范畴

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.31268/ps.2022.98
Agnieszka Kania-Chramęga
{"title":"刑法确立过程中的法无明文罪推定及其(非)范畴","authors":"Agnieszka Kania-Chramęga","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims not only at presenting the nature and the advantages of the postulate of maximum specificity of the created offence type but also at determining whether the exclusively literal, uncompromising understanding of the specificity principle on the basis of the provisions of the criminal law should be assessed as the foundation rationalising the establishment of the criminal law norms. The discussion on the abovementioned topic refers to the views in terms of theory and judicial decisions (with particular emphasis on the decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal) on the basis of which an attempt is made to determine whether potential exceptions from restrictive understanding of the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle pose a threat to the guarantee nature of this principle.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postulat nullum crimen sine lege certa i jego (nie)kategoryczność w procesie stanowienia prawa karnego\",\"authors\":\"Agnieszka Kania-Chramęga\",\"doi\":\"10.31268/ps.2022.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article aims not only at presenting the nature and the advantages of the postulate of maximum specificity of the created offence type but also at determining whether the exclusively literal, uncompromising understanding of the specificity principle on the basis of the provisions of the criminal law should be assessed as the foundation rationalising the establishment of the criminal law norms. The discussion on the abovementioned topic refers to the views in terms of theory and judicial decisions (with particular emphasis on the decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal) on the basis of which an attempt is made to determine whether potential exceptions from restrictive understanding of the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle pose a threat to the guarantee nature of this principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Sejmowy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文不仅旨在阐述设立犯罪类型的最大专一性假设的性质和优势,而且还旨在确定是否应该以刑法规定为基础,对专一性原则的完全字面的、毫不妥协的理解作为设立刑法规范合理化的基础。关于上述专题的讨论涉及理论和司法决定方面的观点(特别强调宪法法庭的决定),在此基础上试图确定对法不明文不为罪原则的限制性理解的潜在例外是否对这一原则的保障性质构成威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postulat nullum crimen sine lege certa i jego (nie)kategoryczność w procesie stanowienia prawa karnego
The article aims not only at presenting the nature and the advantages of the postulate of maximum specificity of the created offence type but also at determining whether the exclusively literal, uncompromising understanding of the specificity principle on the basis of the provisions of the criminal law should be assessed as the foundation rationalising the establishment of the criminal law norms. The discussion on the abovementioned topic refers to the views in terms of theory and judicial decisions (with particular emphasis on the decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal) on the basis of which an attempt is made to determine whether potential exceptions from restrictive understanding of the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle pose a threat to the guarantee nature of this principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Nowa Zelandia: Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 listopada 2022 r. w sprawie Make It 16 Incorporated vs. Attorney-General (dotyczący wieku uprawniającego do głosowania w wyborach), sygn. akt SC 14/2022 Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału Posłanka Wanda Ładzina (1880–1966) i jej działalność w Polsce i we Francji Uczestnictwo Sejmu i Senatu w procedurze kontroli przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności a przyszłość parlamentów narodowych w procesach decyzyjnych Unii Europejskiej Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1