web应用程序开发后端框架的比较

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10
Marin Kaluža, Marijana Kalanj, B. Vukelić
{"title":"web应用程序开发后端框架的比较","authors":"Marin Kaluža, Marijana Kalanj, B. Vukelić","doi":"10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web applications have a complex structure, and for more efficient and faster writing of original program code, frameworks are often used. There are numerous different frameworks on the market that are used to build different parts of software architecture. Only back-end frameworks\nfor web applications development are analyzed. Previous research on evaluation criteria for back-end frameworks, and various sources which by various reasons, represent the list of popularity of back-end frameworks are shown. The framework selection procedure is described, and the reasons of framework selection (Laravel, Rails, Django and Spring) for the analysis are given. The examination (verification) and evaluation of the degree of satisfaction of the selected basic and additional comparison criteria in selected frameworks are carried out. The analysis shows insignificant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks according to the basic comparison criteria. According to the additional comparison criteria, the analysis shows significant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks. It is shown that the Django framework, because it is suitable for development of larger applications, suitable for beginner developers, and achieves the highest overall rating of additional comparison criteria, is the best choice of analyzed back-end frameworks for web application development.","PeriodicalId":40998,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of back-end\\nframeworks for web application development\",\"authors\":\"Marin Kaluža, Marijana Kalanj, B. Vukelić\",\"doi\":\"10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Web applications have a complex structure, and for more efficient and faster writing of original program code, frameworks are often used. There are numerous different frameworks on the market that are used to build different parts of software architecture. Only back-end frameworks\\nfor web applications development are analyzed. Previous research on evaluation criteria for back-end frameworks, and various sources which by various reasons, represent the list of popularity of back-end frameworks are shown. The framework selection procedure is described, and the reasons of framework selection (Laravel, Rails, Django and Spring) for the analysis are given. The examination (verification) and evaluation of the degree of satisfaction of the selected basic and additional comparison criteria in selected frameworks are carried out. The analysis shows insignificant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks according to the basic comparison criteria. According to the additional comparison criteria, the analysis shows significant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks. It is shown that the Django framework, because it is suitable for development of larger applications, suitable for beginner developers, and achieves the highest overall rating of additional comparison criteria, is the best choice of analyzed back-end frameworks for web application development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31784/ZVR.7.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Web应用程序具有复杂的结构,为了更高效、更快地编写原始程序代码,通常使用框架。市场上有许多不同的框架,用于构建软件体系结构的不同部分。本文只分析了web应用程序开发的后端框架。显示了以往对后端框架评价标准的研究,以及由于各种原因,代表后端框架受欢迎程度的各种来源。描述了框架的选择过程,并给出了框架选择的原因(Laravel, Rails, Django和Spring)进行分析。对选定框架中选定的基本标准和附加比较标准的满意程度进行检查(验证)和评价。分析表明,根据基本比较标准,所分析框架的总体评分差异不显著。根据附加的比较标准,分析显示所分析框架的总体评级存在显著差异。结果表明,由于Django框架适合开发大型应用程序,适合初学者开发,并且在附加比较标准中达到了最高的综合评分,因此是web应用程序开发分析后端框架的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of back-end frameworks for web application development
Web applications have a complex structure, and for more efficient and faster writing of original program code, frameworks are often used. There are numerous different frameworks on the market that are used to build different parts of software architecture. Only back-end frameworks for web applications development are analyzed. Previous research on evaluation criteria for back-end frameworks, and various sources which by various reasons, represent the list of popularity of back-end frameworks are shown. The framework selection procedure is described, and the reasons of framework selection (Laravel, Rails, Django and Spring) for the analysis are given. The examination (verification) and evaluation of the degree of satisfaction of the selected basic and additional comparison criteria in selected frameworks are carried out. The analysis shows insignificant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks according to the basic comparison criteria. According to the additional comparison criteria, the analysis shows significant differences in the overall ratings of analyzed frameworks. It is shown that the Django framework, because it is suitable for development of larger applications, suitable for beginner developers, and achieves the highest overall rating of additional comparison criteria, is the best choice of analyzed back-end frameworks for web application development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Determinante potpore lokalnog stanovništva razvoju turizma Controlling 4.0 in times of new technologies application Istraživanje utjecaja pandemije COVID-19 na moderno vodstvo i promjenu paradigme HRM-a Using mobile applications for language learning as part of language classes The significance of cross-cultural barriers in organizational communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1