用ISKD伸缩钉延长股骨:长期临床和放射学结果

B. Jasiewicz, M. Tęsiorowski, T. Potaczek, W. Kącki
{"title":"用ISKD伸缩钉延长股骨:长期临床和放射学结果","authors":"B. Jasiewicz, M. Tęsiorowski, T. Potaczek, W. Kącki","doi":"10.31139/chnriop.2018.83.6.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Among various modern systems of limb lengthening, lengthening with an intramedullary nail seems to be most modern and comfortable for the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the femur lengthening with a self-distracting intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD). Material and methods. This is a retrospective study, conducted in one hospital and involved 10 patients with a mean age of 15.9 years. All patients underwent femur lengthening with an ISKD nail. The mean follow-up period was 38.7 months. We evaluated: gained length; treatment duration; healing index; problems, obstacles and complications during treatment; and the final result. At the last visit, we assessed the condition of the knee joint and daily performance. Results. Mean femur lengthening was 5.7 cm. Mean treatment duration was 7.8 months and mean distraction index was 1.4 months/cm. The main problems and obstacles were related to the initial nail distraction, occurring in 5 patients: ineffective distraction occurred in 4 of the patients and distraction was too rapid in 1 patient. Delayed union was observed in 1 patient. The most common problems reported by the patients were: limping, different thigh circumference, slight difficulties with squatting, and occasional knee pain during great effort accompanied by the feeling of instability. Conclusions. Intramedullary nail lengthening seems an effective method of limb equalization in teenagers and young adults, although patients should be warned that distraction with an intramedullary nail would not result in achieving perfect limb function.","PeriodicalId":89713,"journal":{"name":"Polish orthopedics and traumatology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femur lengthening with a telescopic ISKD nail – long-term clinical and radiological results\",\"authors\":\"B. Jasiewicz, M. Tęsiorowski, T. Potaczek, W. Kącki\",\"doi\":\"10.31139/chnriop.2018.83.6.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Among various modern systems of limb lengthening, lengthening with an intramedullary nail seems to be most modern and comfortable for the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the femur lengthening with a self-distracting intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD). Material and methods. This is a retrospective study, conducted in one hospital and involved 10 patients with a mean age of 15.9 years. All patients underwent femur lengthening with an ISKD nail. The mean follow-up period was 38.7 months. We evaluated: gained length; treatment duration; healing index; problems, obstacles and complications during treatment; and the final result. At the last visit, we assessed the condition of the knee joint and daily performance. Results. Mean femur lengthening was 5.7 cm. Mean treatment duration was 7.8 months and mean distraction index was 1.4 months/cm. The main problems and obstacles were related to the initial nail distraction, occurring in 5 patients: ineffective distraction occurred in 4 of the patients and distraction was too rapid in 1 patient. Delayed union was observed in 1 patient. The most common problems reported by the patients were: limping, different thigh circumference, slight difficulties with squatting, and occasional knee pain during great effort accompanied by the feeling of instability. Conclusions. Intramedullary nail lengthening seems an effective method of limb equalization in teenagers and young adults, although patients should be warned that distraction with an intramedullary nail would not result in achieving perfect limb function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish orthopedics and traumatology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish orthopedics and traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31139/chnriop.2018.83.6.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish orthopedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31139/chnriop.2018.83.6.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在各种现代肢体延长系统中,髓内钉延长似乎是最现代和最舒适的病人。本研究的目的是评估自分散髓内骨骼动力牵引器(ISKD)的股骨延长效果。材料和方法。这是一项回顾性研究,在一家医院进行,涉及10例患者,平均年龄15.9岁。所有患者均行ISKD股骨延长术。平均随访时间为38.7个月。我们评估:获得的长度;治疗持续时间;治疗指数;治疗过程中的问题、障碍和并发症;最后的结果。在最后一次访问中,我们评估了膝关节的状况和日常表现。结果。股骨平均延长5.7 cm。平均治疗时间7.8个月,平均牵张指数1.4个月/cm。5例患者的主要问题和障碍与初次牵甲有关,4例患者牵甲无效,1例患者牵甲过快。1例延迟愈合。患者报告的最常见的问题是:跛行,大腿周长不同,下蹲轻微困难,在用力时偶尔出现膝盖疼痛并伴有不稳定感。结论。髓内钉延长似乎是青少年和年轻人肢体平衡的有效方法,尽管患者应该被警告,髓内钉的分散不会导致达到完美的肢体功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Femur lengthening with a telescopic ISKD nail – long-term clinical and radiological results
Introduction. Among various modern systems of limb lengthening, lengthening with an intramedullary nail seems to be most modern and comfortable for the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the femur lengthening with a self-distracting intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD). Material and methods. This is a retrospective study, conducted in one hospital and involved 10 patients with a mean age of 15.9 years. All patients underwent femur lengthening with an ISKD nail. The mean follow-up period was 38.7 months. We evaluated: gained length; treatment duration; healing index; problems, obstacles and complications during treatment; and the final result. At the last visit, we assessed the condition of the knee joint and daily performance. Results. Mean femur lengthening was 5.7 cm. Mean treatment duration was 7.8 months and mean distraction index was 1.4 months/cm. The main problems and obstacles were related to the initial nail distraction, occurring in 5 patients: ineffective distraction occurred in 4 of the patients and distraction was too rapid in 1 patient. Delayed union was observed in 1 patient. The most common problems reported by the patients were: limping, different thigh circumference, slight difficulties with squatting, and occasional knee pain during great effort accompanied by the feeling of instability. Conclusions. Intramedullary nail lengthening seems an effective method of limb equalization in teenagers and young adults, although patients should be warned that distraction with an intramedullary nail would not result in achieving perfect limb function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the posterior condylar angle (PCA) affect the risk of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear? A case-control study in males aged 18-30 Classics. Fibular hemimelia or deficiency (defectus fibulae) Volar spanning plate fixation for a distal radius fracture Surface replacement arthroplasty in the surgical treatment of hip osteoarthritis Tricortical bone graft from lateral malleolus as an alternative for iliac crest graft in the operative treatment of foot deformities: graft harvesting technique and its application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1