理解伊斯兰现代性的多种声音:以圣战为例

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION TEMENOS Pub Date : 2016-03-31 DOI:10.33356/TEMENOS.52712
Dietrich Jung
{"title":"理解伊斯兰现代性的多种声音:以圣战为例","authors":"Dietrich Jung","doi":"10.33356/TEMENOS.52712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In making a contribution to the debate on multiple modernities, this article addresses the growing fragmentation of contemporary interpretations of Islamic religious traditions. It argues that the polysemic nature of these interpretations mirrors to a certain extent the increasing functional differentiation of modern society. To substantiate this argument, the paper will first present a theoretical framework of global modernity that selectively draws on theories of multiple modernities, Modern Systems Theory, and of (post-)structuralist thinking. The empirical part of the paper takes the case of the Islamic institution of Jihad as its illustrative example. From a genealogical perspective, it analyses a number of steps of the (re-)interpretation of Islamic religious traditions from the classical period of pre-modern Islamic empires, via the Islamic reform movement of the nineteenth century, to the multiple voices of Islamic modernities in contemporary times.","PeriodicalId":43012,"journal":{"name":"TEMENOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Multiple Voices of Islamic Modernities: The Case of Jihad\",\"authors\":\"Dietrich Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.33356/TEMENOS.52712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In making a contribution to the debate on multiple modernities, this article addresses the growing fragmentation of contemporary interpretations of Islamic religious traditions. It argues that the polysemic nature of these interpretations mirrors to a certain extent the increasing functional differentiation of modern society. To substantiate this argument, the paper will first present a theoretical framework of global modernity that selectively draws on theories of multiple modernities, Modern Systems Theory, and of (post-)structuralist thinking. The empirical part of the paper takes the case of the Islamic institution of Jihad as its illustrative example. From a genealogical perspective, it analyses a number of steps of the (re-)interpretation of Islamic religious traditions from the classical period of pre-modern Islamic empires, via the Islamic reform movement of the nineteenth century, to the multiple voices of Islamic modernities in contemporary times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEMENOS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEMENOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.52712\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEMENOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.52712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

为了对多元现代性的辩论做出贡献,本文解决了当代对伊斯兰宗教传统的解释日益分裂的问题。这些解释的多义性在一定程度上反映了现代社会功能分化的加剧。为了证实这一论点,本文将首先提出一个全球现代性的理论框架,该框架有选择地借鉴了多元现代性理论、现代系统理论和(后)结构主义思想。本文的实证部分以伊斯兰教的圣战机构为例进行说明。从宗谱的角度来看,它分析了伊斯兰宗教传统(重新)解释的一些步骤,从前现代伊斯兰帝国的古典时期,通过19世纪的伊斯兰改革运动,到当代伊斯兰现代性的多种声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Multiple Voices of Islamic Modernities: The Case of Jihad
In making a contribution to the debate on multiple modernities, this article addresses the growing fragmentation of contemporary interpretations of Islamic religious traditions. It argues that the polysemic nature of these interpretations mirrors to a certain extent the increasing functional differentiation of modern society. To substantiate this argument, the paper will first present a theoretical framework of global modernity that selectively draws on theories of multiple modernities, Modern Systems Theory, and of (post-)structuralist thinking. The empirical part of the paper takes the case of the Islamic institution of Jihad as its illustrative example. From a genealogical perspective, it analyses a number of steps of the (re-)interpretation of Islamic religious traditions from the classical period of pre-modern Islamic empires, via the Islamic reform movement of the nineteenth century, to the multiple voices of Islamic modernities in contemporary times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEMENOS
TEMENOS RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Echo of Creation Knowing, Being, and Doing Religion Pål Ketil Botvar, Ann Kristin Gresaker, and Olav Hovdelien (eds): Ingen Spøk – en studie av religion og humour Finnish Muslims’ Journey from an Invisible Minority to Public Partnerships Theory in the Interstices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1