泌尿外科医师对高压氧治疗富尼耶坏疽的认识、看法和方法的调查

Kübra Özgök Kangal, Kübra Canarslan Demir
{"title":"泌尿外科医师对高压氧治疗富尼耶坏疽的认识、看法和方法的调查","authors":"Kübra Özgök Kangal, Kübra Canarslan Demir","doi":"10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1066203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Fournier gangrene is a form of necrotizing fasciitis with high mortality. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a successful and supportive treatment option for Fournier’s gangrene (FG). This study aimed to analyze urologists’ knowledge, opinions, and preferences about HBOT application in FG. Material and Methods: An online or face-to-face questionnaire was applied to physicians who are experts in the field of Urology or who have been continuing Urology residency training for at least one year. Results: Ninety urology physicians filled out the questionnaire. Most of them (56.4%) never refer FG cases to HBOT. Physicians (55.3%) mostly preferred HBOT only in patients unresponsive to surgical debridement and antibiotherapy. Besides, 27.3% of them stated they had no information when asked to self-assess their knowledge. Only 12 physicians (13.3%) had previously been in an HBOT center, and 15 (16.7%) physicians had participated in a scientific study on HBOT. Only three physicians (3.4%) stated HBOT was not beneficial to FG patients. Urologists’ opinions about HBOT efficiency in FG were examined (3-point-Likert type questions) in 5 questions; the median score was 2 points (minimum-maximum: 1-3 points). On the other hand, physicians who did not know HBOT had more negative opinions about HBOT efficiency in FG (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Urology physicians’ knowledge of HBOT, their doubts about HBOT in FG, and their relatively low experience with HBOT are clearly shown in this study. Therefore, urology physicians should be encouraged to increase their HBOT experience in FG and participate in scientific studies. Also, Urology Associations should discuss HBOT efficiency more effectively in guidelines and meetings. Keywords: Fournier’s gangrene, hyperbaric oxygenation, questionnaire, urologists","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on the knowledge, opinions, and approaches in clinical practice of urology physicians about hyperbaric oxygen therapy application in Fournier gangrene\",\"authors\":\"Kübra Özgök Kangal, Kübra Canarslan Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1066203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Fournier gangrene is a form of necrotizing fasciitis with high mortality. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a successful and supportive treatment option for Fournier’s gangrene (FG). This study aimed to analyze urologists’ knowledge, opinions, and preferences about HBOT application in FG. Material and Methods: An online or face-to-face questionnaire was applied to physicians who are experts in the field of Urology or who have been continuing Urology residency training for at least one year. Results: Ninety urology physicians filled out the questionnaire. Most of them (56.4%) never refer FG cases to HBOT. Physicians (55.3%) mostly preferred HBOT only in patients unresponsive to surgical debridement and antibiotherapy. Besides, 27.3% of them stated they had no information when asked to self-assess their knowledge. Only 12 physicians (13.3%) had previously been in an HBOT center, and 15 (16.7%) physicians had participated in a scientific study on HBOT. Only three physicians (3.4%) stated HBOT was not beneficial to FG patients. Urologists’ opinions about HBOT efficiency in FG were examined (3-point-Likert type questions) in 5 questions; the median score was 2 points (minimum-maximum: 1-3 points). On the other hand, physicians who did not know HBOT had more negative opinions about HBOT efficiency in FG (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Urology physicians’ knowledge of HBOT, their doubts about HBOT in FG, and their relatively low experience with HBOT are clearly shown in this study. Therefore, urology physicians should be encouraged to increase their HBOT experience in FG and participate in scientific studies. Also, Urology Associations should discuss HBOT efficiency more effectively in guidelines and meetings. Keywords: Fournier’s gangrene, hyperbaric oxygenation, questionnaire, urologists\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1066203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1066203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:富尼尔坏疽是一种死亡率高的坏死性筋膜炎。高压氧治疗(HBOT)是治疗富尼耶坏疽(FG)的一种成功的支持性治疗选择。本研究旨在分析泌尿科医师对HBOT在FG中应用的认知、看法和偏好。材料和方法:对泌尿外科专家或接受过至少一年泌尿外科住院医师培训的医生进行在线或面对面的问卷调查。结果:90名泌尿外科医师填写了问卷。大多数(56.4%)从未将FG病例转介至HBOT。医生(55.3%)大多只在对手术清创和抗生素治疗无反应的患者中选择HBOT。此外,27.3%的学生在被要求自我评估知识时表示不知道。只有12名医生(13.3%)曾在HBOT中心工作过,15名医生(16.7%)曾参加过关于HBOT的科学研究。只有3名医生(3.4%)表示HBOT对FG患者没有益处。在5个问题中考察泌尿科医师对FG患者HBOT效率的看法(3点likert题型);中位数为2分(最小-最大:1-3分)。另一方面,不了解HBOT的医生对FG中HBOT效率的负面评价更多(p = 0.002)。结论:泌尿科医师对HBOT的了解程度、对FG中HBOT的疑虑以及相对较低的HBOT经验在本研究中得到了清晰的体现。因此,应鼓励泌尿外科医生增加在FG的HBOT经验并参与科学研究。此外,泌尿外科协会应在指南和会议上更有效地讨论HBOT的效率。关键词:富尼耶坏疽,高压氧,问卷调查,泌尿科医生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey on the knowledge, opinions, and approaches in clinical practice of urology physicians about hyperbaric oxygen therapy application in Fournier gangrene
Objective: Fournier gangrene is a form of necrotizing fasciitis with high mortality. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a successful and supportive treatment option for Fournier’s gangrene (FG). This study aimed to analyze urologists’ knowledge, opinions, and preferences about HBOT application in FG. Material and Methods: An online or face-to-face questionnaire was applied to physicians who are experts in the field of Urology or who have been continuing Urology residency training for at least one year. Results: Ninety urology physicians filled out the questionnaire. Most of them (56.4%) never refer FG cases to HBOT. Physicians (55.3%) mostly preferred HBOT only in patients unresponsive to surgical debridement and antibiotherapy. Besides, 27.3% of them stated they had no information when asked to self-assess their knowledge. Only 12 physicians (13.3%) had previously been in an HBOT center, and 15 (16.7%) physicians had participated in a scientific study on HBOT. Only three physicians (3.4%) stated HBOT was not beneficial to FG patients. Urologists’ opinions about HBOT efficiency in FG were examined (3-point-Likert type questions) in 5 questions; the median score was 2 points (minimum-maximum: 1-3 points). On the other hand, physicians who did not know HBOT had more negative opinions about HBOT efficiency in FG (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Urology physicians’ knowledge of HBOT, their doubts about HBOT in FG, and their relatively low experience with HBOT are clearly shown in this study. Therefore, urology physicians should be encouraged to increase their HBOT experience in FG and participate in scientific studies. Also, Urology Associations should discuss HBOT efficiency more effectively in guidelines and meetings. Keywords: Fournier’s gangrene, hyperbaric oxygenation, questionnaire, urologists
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1