自由主义失败

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE Anafora Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.29162/anafora.v7i1.7
Hossein Pirnajmuddin, Sara Saei Dibavar
{"title":"自由主义失败","authors":"Hossein Pirnajmuddin, Sara Saei Dibavar","doi":"10.29162/anafora.v7i1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Updike’s Rabbit, Run addresses the human condition under the reign of capital in the context of a society in transition toward a neoliberal state. By depicting a protagonist preoccupied with desire and consciousness through recounting his immediate experiences, the narrative delineates the confusion inherent in the capitalistic state for the protagonist in search of a way out toward self-actualization. Through the application of possible world theory, it is argued that the imbalance between Rabbit’s counterfactual possible worlds and his actual world accounts for the failure he experiences in his quest. As such, the possible worlds’ disequilibrium, we argue, ultimately leads to Rabbit’s bitter failure in his search; too many possible worlds in their counterfactual state produce a kind of counter-reality where there are too many fantasy/wish worlds, but few obligation worlds, a situation that leads to all the inevitable consequences we witness at the end of Book One of the Rabbit tetralogy.","PeriodicalId":40415,"journal":{"name":"Anafora","volume":"7 1","pages":"145-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberal Failure\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Pirnajmuddin, Sara Saei Dibavar\",\"doi\":\"10.29162/anafora.v7i1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"John Updike’s Rabbit, Run addresses the human condition under the reign of capital in the context of a society in transition toward a neoliberal state. By depicting a protagonist preoccupied with desire and consciousness through recounting his immediate experiences, the narrative delineates the confusion inherent in the capitalistic state for the protagonist in search of a way out toward self-actualization. Through the application of possible world theory, it is argued that the imbalance between Rabbit’s counterfactual possible worlds and his actual world accounts for the failure he experiences in his quest. As such, the possible worlds’ disequilibrium, we argue, ultimately leads to Rabbit’s bitter failure in his search; too many possible worlds in their counterfactual state produce a kind of counter-reality where there are too many fantasy/wish worlds, but few obligation worlds, a situation that leads to all the inevitable consequences we witness at the end of Book One of the Rabbit tetralogy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anafora\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"145-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anafora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29162/anafora.v7i1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anafora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/anafora.v7i1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约翰·厄普代克(John Updike)的《兔子,快跑》(Rabbit, Run)在一个向新自由主义国家过渡的社会背景下,探讨了资本统治下的人类状况。通过叙述主人公的亲身经历,描绘了一个被欲望和意识所困扰的主人公,叙述了主人公在寻求自我实现的道路上所固有的困惑。通过运用可能世界理论,认为兔子的反事实可能世界与他的真实世界之间的不平衡是兔子在探索中失败的原因。因此,我们认为,可能世界的不平衡,最终导致兔子在他的搜索中痛苦的失败;太多的可能世界处于反事实状态,产生了一种反现实,其中有太多的幻想/愿望世界,但很少有义务世界,这种情况导致了我们在兔子四部曲的第一本书结尾看到的所有不可避免的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liberal Failure
John Updike’s Rabbit, Run addresses the human condition under the reign of capital in the context of a society in transition toward a neoliberal state. By depicting a protagonist preoccupied with desire and consciousness through recounting his immediate experiences, the narrative delineates the confusion inherent in the capitalistic state for the protagonist in search of a way out toward self-actualization. Through the application of possible world theory, it is argued that the imbalance between Rabbit’s counterfactual possible worlds and his actual world accounts for the failure he experiences in his quest. As such, the possible worlds’ disequilibrium, we argue, ultimately leads to Rabbit’s bitter failure in his search; too many possible worlds in their counterfactual state produce a kind of counter-reality where there are too many fantasy/wish worlds, but few obligation worlds, a situation that leads to all the inevitable consequences we witness at the end of Book One of the Rabbit tetralogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anafora
Anafora LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Historical Metafiction: Elena Ferrante’s Neapolitan Novels as a Postmodern Rethinking of History Moderno kazalište iz estetskih perspektiva Yellowstone and the western revival O književnoj životinji u Kanižlićevoj Svetoj Rožaliji Sjena moje mame: Narativi o demenciji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1