{"title":"个人平等还是群体平等:最高法院在曼哈特案中判决的含义","authors":"Van Alstyne, W. William","doi":"10.2307/40225108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary breaks down the case of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart and discusses what effects the Supreme Court's decision will have when Title VII is applied to university employers, particularly in their relationship with TIAA-CREF.","PeriodicalId":87494,"journal":{"name":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","volume":"64 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225108","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equality for Individuals or Equality for Groups: Implications of the Supreme Court Decision in the Manhart Case\",\"authors\":\"Van Alstyne, W. William\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40225108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This commentary breaks down the case of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart and discusses what effects the Supreme Court's decision will have when Title VII is applied to university employers, particularly in their relationship with TIAA-CREF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225108\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Equality for Individuals or Equality for Groups: Implications of the Supreme Court Decision in the Manhart Case
This commentary breaks down the case of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart and discusses what effects the Supreme Court's decision will have when Title VII is applied to university employers, particularly in their relationship with TIAA-CREF.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
