美国总统竞选修辞中的牛熊交际策略

D. Mukhortov, E. Zhovner
{"title":"美国总统竞选修辞中的牛熊交际策略","authors":"D. Mukhortov, E. Zhovner","doi":"10.31862/2500-2953-2019-2-48-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to introduce bull and bear communicative strategies in the US election discourse. The coinage is derived from the popular images of bull and bear in the economic terms ‘bull market’ and ‘bear market’. The bull strategy focuses on positive self-presentation, while the bear strategy is aimed at negative otherpresentation. Research into US presidential debates shows that most frequent communicative strategies aim either to create and reinforce the politician’s positive image or to discredit his or her opponent and ruin their chances to win. Which of the strategies stands to be more efficient is yet a matter of argument; however it is vividly shown that these strategies provide the perfect breeding ground for discursive confrontation.","PeriodicalId":33863,"journal":{"name":"Rhema Rema","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bull and Bear Communicative Strategies in the US presidential campaign rhetoric\",\"authors\":\"D. Mukhortov, E. Zhovner\",\"doi\":\"10.31862/2500-2953-2019-2-48-60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article seeks to introduce bull and bear communicative strategies in the US election discourse. The coinage is derived from the popular images of bull and bear in the economic terms ‘bull market’ and ‘bear market’. The bull strategy focuses on positive self-presentation, while the bear strategy is aimed at negative otherpresentation. Research into US presidential debates shows that most frequent communicative strategies aim either to create and reinforce the politician’s positive image or to discredit his or her opponent and ruin their chances to win. Which of the strategies stands to be more efficient is yet a matter of argument; however it is vividly shown that these strategies provide the perfect breeding ground for discursive confrontation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhema Rema\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhema Rema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2019-2-48-60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhema Rema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2019-2-48-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在介绍美国大选话语中的牛熊交际策略。这个词来源于经济术语“牛市”和“熊市”中牛和熊的流行形象。牛市策略侧重于积极的自我呈现,而熊市策略侧重于消极的其他呈现。对美国总统辩论的研究表明,最常见的沟通策略要么是为了创造和加强政治家的正面形象,要么是为了诋毁对手,破坏他们获胜的机会。哪一种策略更有效仍是一个争论的问题;然而,它生动地表明,这些策略为话语对抗提供了完美的温床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Bull and Bear Communicative Strategies in the US presidential campaign rhetoric
This article seeks to introduce bull and bear communicative strategies in the US election discourse. The coinage is derived from the popular images of bull and bear in the economic terms ‘bull market’ and ‘bear market’. The bull strategy focuses on positive self-presentation, while the bear strategy is aimed at negative otherpresentation. Research into US presidential debates shows that most frequent communicative strategies aim either to create and reinforce the politician’s positive image or to discredit his or her opponent and ruin their chances to win. Which of the strategies stands to be more efficient is yet a matter of argument; however it is vividly shown that these strategies provide the perfect breeding ground for discursive confrontation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Communication tasks in Russian speech etiquette classes for international students On Alexei Achair’s narrative poem “The Cossacks” Kinship terms in Kannada: Semantic shifts and the ways of meaning change The concepts of “methodology”, “method”, “technology”, “approach” and “technique” in linguodidactics Boris Pasternak as seen by V. Khodasevich and “Gulliver”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1