插管,清醒和瘫痪:一个从未发生过的事件

Huw F. Mayberry, A. Burgart, C. Kanaris
{"title":"插管,清醒和瘫痪:一个从未发生过的事件","authors":"Huw F. Mayberry, A. Burgart, C. Kanaris","doi":"10.2991/icres.k.211028.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we argue that paralysis-only intubation is almost never acceptable practice. We look at the evidence suggesting that this practice remains commonplace worldwide, its frequency has been exacerbated further by anaesthetic drug shortages secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. We make a strong case that intubating a patient without sedation has such profound psychological and physiological risks that the practice is unethical and should be banned from medical practice with the exception of two clinical settings. These exceptions include (a) newborn intubation immediately after birth if there is immediate risk to life and (b) awake fibreoptic intubation whereby the patient has consented in advance, co-operative, and the","PeriodicalId":73403,"journal":{"name":"Intensive care research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intubated, Awake, and Paralysed: A Never Event\",\"authors\":\"Huw F. Mayberry, A. Burgart, C. Kanaris\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icres.k.211028.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we argue that paralysis-only intubation is almost never acceptable practice. We look at the evidence suggesting that this practice remains commonplace worldwide, its frequency has been exacerbated further by anaesthetic drug shortages secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. We make a strong case that intubating a patient without sedation has such profound psychological and physiological risks that the practice is unethical and should be banned from medical practice with the exception of two clinical settings. These exceptions include (a) newborn intubation immediately after birth if there is immediate risk to life and (b) awake fibreoptic intubation whereby the patient has consented in advance, co-operative, and the\",\"PeriodicalId\":73403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive care research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive care research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icres.k.211028.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive care research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icres.k.211028.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们认为,只有瘫痪插管几乎从来没有被接受的做法。我们认为,有证据表明,这种做法在世界范围内仍然很普遍,由于COVID-19大流行导致的麻醉药物短缺,这种做法的频率进一步加剧。我们提出了一个强有力的案例,即在没有镇静的情况下给病人插管有如此深刻的心理和生理风险,这种做法是不道德的,除了两种临床情况外,应该禁止医学实践。这些例外情况包括:(a)在新生儿出生后立即插管,如果有直接的生命危险;(b)清醒纤维插管,在患者事先同意的情况下,配合,并且
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intubated, Awake, and Paralysed: A Never Event
In this paper, we argue that paralysis-only intubation is almost never acceptable practice. We look at the evidence suggesting that this practice remains commonplace worldwide, its frequency has been exacerbated further by anaesthetic drug shortages secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. We make a strong case that intubating a patient without sedation has such profound psychological and physiological risks that the practice is unethical and should be banned from medical practice with the exception of two clinical settings. These exceptions include (a) newborn intubation immediately after birth if there is immediate risk to life and (b) awake fibreoptic intubation whereby the patient has consented in advance, co-operative, and the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Urgency: A Narrative Review on the Critical Demand for Robust Outcome Measures in Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Effects of Oral Versus Intravenous Linezolid Administration on Treatment Effect and Incidence of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Severe Infection Septic Shock, Tubular Necrosis, and Central Diabetes Insipidus: A Challenging Syndrome Safety and Feasibility of Electrocardiogram-Guided Tip Positioning Combined with Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Performed in Severe Brain Injury Patients Guidelines for Early Mobilisation of Intubated Patients in Intensive Care Unit: Clinical Pathology Evidence-Base Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1