{"title":"成员国的程序自治以及对等和有效原则","authors":"Katalin Holé","doi":"10.29327/270098.14.23-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has as its goal to discuss the barriers of national procedural autonomy emerging in the member states of the European Union. I also discuss the legal interpretation activities of the European Court of Justice make on national procedural laws and what national codification measures the enforcement of EU law requires.","PeriodicalId":31433,"journal":{"name":"Revista ESMAT","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER STATES AND THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS\",\"authors\":\"Katalin Holé\",\"doi\":\"10.29327/270098.14.23-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article has as its goal to discuss the barriers of national procedural autonomy emerging in the member states of the European Union. I also discuss the legal interpretation activities of the European Court of Justice make on national procedural laws and what national codification measures the enforcement of EU law requires.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista ESMAT\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista ESMAT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29327/270098.14.23-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista ESMAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/270098.14.23-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER STATES AND THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS
This article has as its goal to discuss the barriers of national procedural autonomy emerging in the member states of the European Union. I also discuss the legal interpretation activities of the European Court of Justice make on national procedural laws and what national codification measures the enforcement of EU law requires.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
