在Mathematica中使用径向基函数评估财务期权

M. Kelly
{"title":"在Mathematica中使用径向基函数评估财务期权","authors":"M. Kelly","doi":"10.3888/TMJ.11.3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the academic literature there are two common approaches for the evaluation of financial options. These are stochastic calculus and partial differential equations. The former is the method of choice for statisticians and theoreticians, while the latter is the principal tool of physicists and computer scientists because it lends itself to practical implementation schemes. Occasionally small modifications such as linear regression and binomial trees are used, but these are usually treated within either of the two previously mentioned fields. Rarely do the practitioners of these fields compare and contrast methodologies, let alone admit completely different approaches. While Radial Basis Function (RBF) methodology has previously been applied to solving some differential equations, there are very few papers considering its applicability to financial mathematics. The purpose of this article is to show not only that RBF can solve many of the evaluation problems for financial options, but that with Mathematica it can do so with accuracy and speed.","PeriodicalId":91418,"journal":{"name":"The Mathematica journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"333-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Financial Options Using Radial Basis Functions in Mathematica\",\"authors\":\"M. Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.3888/TMJ.11.3-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the academic literature there are two common approaches for the evaluation of financial options. These are stochastic calculus and partial differential equations. The former is the method of choice for statisticians and theoreticians, while the latter is the principal tool of physicists and computer scientists because it lends itself to practical implementation schemes. Occasionally small modifications such as linear regression and binomial trees are used, but these are usually treated within either of the two previously mentioned fields. Rarely do the practitioners of these fields compare and contrast methodologies, let alone admit completely different approaches. While Radial Basis Function (RBF) methodology has previously been applied to solving some differential equations, there are very few papers considering its applicability to financial mathematics. The purpose of this article is to show not only that RBF can solve many of the evaluation problems for financial options, but that with Mathematica it can do so with accuracy and speed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Mathematica journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"333-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Mathematica journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3888/TMJ.11.3-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mathematica journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3888/TMJ.11.3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在学术文献中,有两种常见的财务期权评估方法。这些是随机微积分和偏微分方程。前者是统计学家和理论家的首选方法,而后者是物理学家和计算机科学家的主要工具,因为它适合于实际的实施方案。偶尔会使用一些小的修改,如线性回归和二项树,但这些通常是在前面提到的两个字段中处理的。这些领域的实践者很少比较和对比方法论,更不用说承认完全不同的方法了。虽然径向基函数(RBF)方法已经被应用于求解一些微分方程,但很少有论文考虑它在金融数学中的适用性。本文的目的不仅是展示RBF可以解决许多财务选项的评估问题,而且展示使用Mathematica可以准确而快速地解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Financial Options Using Radial Basis Functions in Mathematica
In the academic literature there are two common approaches for the evaluation of financial options. These are stochastic calculus and partial differential equations. The former is the method of choice for statisticians and theoreticians, while the latter is the principal tool of physicists and computer scientists because it lends itself to practical implementation schemes. Occasionally small modifications such as linear regression and binomial trees are used, but these are usually treated within either of the two previously mentioned fields. Rarely do the practitioners of these fields compare and contrast methodologies, let alone admit completely different approaches. While Radial Basis Function (RBF) methodology has previously been applied to solving some differential equations, there are very few papers considering its applicability to financial mathematics. The purpose of this article is to show not only that RBF can solve many of the evaluation problems for financial options, but that with Mathematica it can do so with accuracy and speed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mixing Numbers and Unfriendly Colorings of Graphs Selected Financial Applications Coverage versus Confidence Numerical Contour Integration Unconditional Applicability of Lehmer’s Measure to the Two-Term Machin-like Formula for π
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1