{"title":"维京时代剑的研究:金相学与考古学","authors":"E. Astrup, Irmelin Martens","doi":"10.3989/GLADIUS.2011.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is a comment on Alan Williams investigation ‘A Metallurgical Study of some Viking Swords’ published in Gladius XXIX. Williams’ paper comprise metallurgical investigations of 44 Viking Age Swords, all with ULFBERHT inscriptions. Such investigations, made by a well qualified metallurgist, are essential to archaeology. Unfortunately, this one has some serious limitations. In order to give a good description of the quality of a sword-blade, samples showing at least the section through both the edge and the central part of the blade are necessary. This is mostly not the case in Williams’ investigations, and he gives insufficient information about his samples. Other weak points are his group division and his interpretation of the production area for blades containing high-carbon steel.","PeriodicalId":42057,"journal":{"name":"Gladius","volume":"31 1","pages":"203-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies of Viking Age swords: metallography and archaeology\",\"authors\":\"E. Astrup, Irmelin Martens\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/GLADIUS.2011.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper is a comment on Alan Williams investigation ‘A Metallurgical Study of some Viking Swords’ published in Gladius XXIX. Williams’ paper comprise metallurgical investigations of 44 Viking Age Swords, all with ULFBERHT inscriptions. Such investigations, made by a well qualified metallurgist, are essential to archaeology. Unfortunately, this one has some serious limitations. In order to give a good description of the quality of a sword-blade, samples showing at least the section through both the edge and the central part of the blade are necessary. This is mostly not the case in Williams’ investigations, and he gives insufficient information about his samples. Other weak points are his group division and his interpretation of the production area for blades containing high-carbon steel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gladius\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"203-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gladius\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/GLADIUS.2011.0009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gladius","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/GLADIUS.2011.0009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
这篇论文是对Alan Williams发表在《Gladius XXIX》上的研究“a Metallurgical Study of some Viking Swords”的评论。威廉姆斯的论文包括对44把维京时代的剑的冶金研究,这些剑都有ULFBERHT的铭文。由一位合格的冶金学家进行的这种调查对考古学是必不可少的。不幸的是,这种方法有一些严重的局限性。为了对剑刃的质量给出一个很好的描述,样品至少要显示剑刃的边缘和中心部分的截面。威廉姆斯的调查大多不是这样,他提供的样本信息也不充分。其他缺点是他的分组划分和他对含高碳钢叶片生产区域的解释。
Studies of Viking Age swords: metallography and archaeology
The paper is a comment on Alan Williams investigation ‘A Metallurgical Study of some Viking Swords’ published in Gladius XXIX. Williams’ paper comprise metallurgical investigations of 44 Viking Age Swords, all with ULFBERHT inscriptions. Such investigations, made by a well qualified metallurgist, are essential to archaeology. Unfortunately, this one has some serious limitations. In order to give a good description of the quality of a sword-blade, samples showing at least the section through both the edge and the central part of the blade are necessary. This is mostly not the case in Williams’ investigations, and he gives insufficient information about his samples. Other weak points are his group division and his interpretation of the production area for blades containing high-carbon steel.