在瑞士及其他国家建立亲属关系:想象与物质

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 Social Sciences Sociologus Pub Date : 2015-09-22 DOI:10.3790/SOC.65.1.1
Nolwenn Bühler, Anika König
{"title":"在瑞士及其他国家建立亲属关系:想象与物质","authors":"Nolwenn Bühler, Anika König","doi":"10.3790/SOC.65.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue deals with the making of kinship through medical, political, affective, and legal technologies. While this primarily refers to the creation of kinship through medically assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization or gamete donation, it also includes further techniques of making kinship such as marriages, the establishment of so-called ‘donor siblingship’, and more general ways of creating belonging and an ‘imagined community’ (Anderson 1991 [1983]). We understand technology as a device which assists the making of kinship that is situated in political, legal, and affective spheres and which therefore should be understood in a much broader way than just referring to the biotechnological manipulation of body substances. The term assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) refers to the technological means of manipulating gametes in order to conceive a child. Probably the best known of these techniques is the so-called ‘in vitro’ (Latin: ‘in glass’) fertilization or IVF. By isolating reproductive substance from the human body and enabling its cultivation in a petri dish, ‘IVF has changed scientific understandings of what life is’ (Franklin 2013 referring to Maienschein 2003) but also of what kinship is. In contemporary Euro-American thinking 1 , kinship is considered as the domain that is based on the ‘natural facts of life’ (Strathern 1992) – such as sex difference, generational succession, pregnancy and birth. Therefore, by intervening at the core of the making of a new life by dividing reproduction from sexual intercourse and taking it out of the human","PeriodicalId":42778,"journal":{"name":"Sociologus","volume":"65 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Kinship in Switzerland and Beyond: Imaginations and Substances\",\"authors\":\"Nolwenn Bühler, Anika König\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/SOC.65.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue deals with the making of kinship through medical, political, affective, and legal technologies. While this primarily refers to the creation of kinship through medically assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization or gamete donation, it also includes further techniques of making kinship such as marriages, the establishment of so-called ‘donor siblingship’, and more general ways of creating belonging and an ‘imagined community’ (Anderson 1991 [1983]). We understand technology as a device which assists the making of kinship that is situated in political, legal, and affective spheres and which therefore should be understood in a much broader way than just referring to the biotechnological manipulation of body substances. The term assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) refers to the technological means of manipulating gametes in order to conceive a child. Probably the best known of these techniques is the so-called ‘in vitro’ (Latin: ‘in glass’) fertilization or IVF. By isolating reproductive substance from the human body and enabling its cultivation in a petri dish, ‘IVF has changed scientific understandings of what life is’ (Franklin 2013 referring to Maienschein 2003) but also of what kinship is. In contemporary Euro-American thinking 1 , kinship is considered as the domain that is based on the ‘natural facts of life’ (Strathern 1992) – such as sex difference, generational succession, pregnancy and birth. Therefore, by intervening at the core of the making of a new life by dividing reproduction from sexual intercourse and taking it out of the human\",\"PeriodicalId\":42778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologus\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/SOC.65.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/SOC.65.1.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本期专题讨论通过医疗、政治、情感和法律技术建立亲属关系。虽然这主要是指通过医学辅助生殖技术(如体外受精或配子捐赠)建立亲属关系,但它还包括进一步建立亲属关系的技术,如婚姻,建立所谓的“捐赠者兄弟姐妹”,以及更一般的创造归属感和“想象社区”的方式(Anderson 1991[1983])。我们把技术理解为一种帮助在政治、法律和情感领域建立亲属关系的手段,因此应该以一种更广泛的方式来理解,而不仅仅是指对身体物质的生物技术操纵。辅助生殖技术(ARTs)一词是指操纵配子以孕育孩子的技术手段。这些技术中最著名的可能是所谓的“体外”(拉丁语:“在玻璃里”)受精或IVF。通过将生殖物质从人体中分离出来,并使其在培养皿中培养,“体外受精改变了对生命的科学理解”(Franklin 2013年引用了2003年的Maienschein),也改变了对亲属关系的理解。在当代欧美人的思想中,亲属关系被认为是建立在“生活的自然事实”基础上的领域(斯特拉森,1992)——比如性别差异、代际继承、怀孕和生育。因此,通过干预创造新生命的核心通过将生殖从性交中分离出来并将其从人类中分离出来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making Kinship in Switzerland and Beyond: Imaginations and Substances
This special issue deals with the making of kinship through medical, political, affective, and legal technologies. While this primarily refers to the creation of kinship through medically assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization or gamete donation, it also includes further techniques of making kinship such as marriages, the establishment of so-called ‘donor siblingship’, and more general ways of creating belonging and an ‘imagined community’ (Anderson 1991 [1983]). We understand technology as a device which assists the making of kinship that is situated in political, legal, and affective spheres and which therefore should be understood in a much broader way than just referring to the biotechnological manipulation of body substances. The term assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) refers to the technological means of manipulating gametes in order to conceive a child. Probably the best known of these techniques is the so-called ‘in vitro’ (Latin: ‘in glass’) fertilization or IVF. By isolating reproductive substance from the human body and enabling its cultivation in a petri dish, ‘IVF has changed scientific understandings of what life is’ (Franklin 2013 referring to Maienschein 2003) but also of what kinship is. In contemporary Euro-American thinking 1 , kinship is considered as the domain that is based on the ‘natural facts of life’ (Strathern 1992) – such as sex difference, generational succession, pregnancy and birth. Therefore, by intervening at the core of the making of a new life by dividing reproduction from sexual intercourse and taking it out of the human
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologus
Sociologus Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Struggle to be an Icon. Iranian Women’s Perspectives on Female Identities in Transnational Contexts (Dis)avling Sacrifice: Veterans’ Classification in Iran Discussion Paper. The Anti-Refugee Machine: A Draft Framework for Migration Studies Tagungsbericht. „Terrains Mouvants. L’ethnologie de Hilde et Richard Thurnwald/Unsichere Felder. Hilde und Richard Thurnwalds Ethnologie/Changing Fields. Hilde And Richard Thurnwald’s Ethnology“,7.–9. Juli 2021, Paris A Bridge that Divides: Hostile Infrastructures. Coloniality and Watchfulness in San Diego, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1