欧洲法律在中欧候选国的适用

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW European Law Review Pub Date : 2005-12-30 DOI:10.3935/CYELP.01.2005.03
Z. Kuhn
{"title":"欧洲法律在中欧候选国的适用","authors":"Z. Kuhn","doi":"10.3935/CYELP.01.2005.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of European enlargement had a peculiar nature. Prior to accession in 2004, EU law was not yet formally binding on EU candidates’ domestic courts, while the obligation of gradual harmonisation with EU law rested upon them. Consequently, the application of EU law in future Member States presented particularly interesting problems and challenges, and required an understanding of the sophisticated concept of EU law’s persuasive force. The only rational choice was to apply Community law, taking into account not only the limited scope of the legislative texts for harmonisation, but also Community law in its full meaning. This included the texts of European directives, which had to be transposed into domestic law, as well as their reasoning and rationale, which would explain why a particular policy was regulated at the European level; ECJ jurisprudence; and, ideally, also the case law of EU Member States. This article argues that this involves a special type of use of comparative law.","PeriodicalId":45752,"journal":{"name":"European Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"551-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of European law in Central European candidate countries\",\"authors\":\"Z. Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/CYELP.01.2005.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of European enlargement had a peculiar nature. Prior to accession in 2004, EU law was not yet formally binding on EU candidates’ domestic courts, while the obligation of gradual harmonisation with EU law rested upon them. Consequently, the application of EU law in future Member States presented particularly interesting problems and challenges, and required an understanding of the sophisticated concept of EU law’s persuasive force. The only rational choice was to apply Community law, taking into account not only the limited scope of the legislative texts for harmonisation, but also Community law in its full meaning. This included the texts of European directives, which had to be transposed into domestic law, as well as their reasoning and rationale, which would explain why a particular policy was regulated at the European level; ECJ jurisprudence; and, ideally, also the case law of EU Member States. This article argues that this involves a special type of use of comparative law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"551-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.01.2005.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.01.2005.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

欧洲东扩的进程具有特殊的性质。在2004年加入欧盟之前,欧盟法律还没有正式约束欧盟候选国的国内法院,而与欧盟法律逐步协调的义务落在了它们身上。因此,欧盟法律在未来成员国的适用提出了特别有趣的问题和挑战,并且需要理解欧盟法律的说服力这一复杂概念。唯一合理的选择是适用共同体法,不仅要考虑到协调立法案文的有限范围,而且要考虑到共同体法的全部含义。这包括必须转化为国内法的欧洲指令的文本,以及它们的推理和理由,这将解释为什么一项特定政策在欧洲一级受到管制;ECJ法学;理想情况下,还包括欧盟成员国的判例法。本文认为,这涉及一种特殊类型的比较法运用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of European law in Central European candidate countries
The process of European enlargement had a peculiar nature. Prior to accession in 2004, EU law was not yet formally binding on EU candidates’ domestic courts, while the obligation of gradual harmonisation with EU law rested upon them. Consequently, the application of EU law in future Member States presented particularly interesting problems and challenges, and required an understanding of the sophisticated concept of EU law’s persuasive force. The only rational choice was to apply Community law, taking into account not only the limited scope of the legislative texts for harmonisation, but also Community law in its full meaning. This included the texts of European directives, which had to be transposed into domestic law, as well as their reasoning and rationale, which would explain why a particular policy was regulated at the European level; ECJ jurisprudence; and, ideally, also the case law of EU Member States. This article argues that this involves a special type of use of comparative law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Playing by its own rules? A quantitative empirical analysis of justificatory reasoning in the registered trade mark case law of the European Court of Justice - dataset Beyond Food Safety: EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism When Does a Communication to the Public Under EU Copyright Law Need to Be to a ‘New Public’? Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership - Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law Regulatory Autonomy after EU Membership: Alignment, Divergence and the Discipline of Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1