经典鲁棒前向选择:仿真研究与实际数据应用

Moushumi Pervin, M. Rahman
{"title":"经典鲁棒前向选择:仿真研究与实际数据应用","authors":"Moushumi Pervin, M. Rahman","doi":"10.4172/2155-6180.1000404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to use any method as a model selection algorithm, it is needed to check the adequacy and stability of a model selected by the algorithm. Adequacy of a robust model was not checked by giving outliers in various ways. In this paper, several contamination cases have been introduced to check the adequacy of the robust model selected by robust forward selection (RFS). In each of the contamination case, the performance of RFS has been compared to standard forward selection (FS) through a simulation study. The adequacy and stability of the robust model has also been checked through a real data application. Based on simulation study and real data application, RFS has much better performance compared to standard FS.","PeriodicalId":87294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000404","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical and Robust Forward Selection: A Simulation Study and Real Data Application\",\"authors\":\"Moushumi Pervin, M. Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6180.1000404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to use any method as a model selection algorithm, it is needed to check the adequacy and stability of a model selected by the algorithm. Adequacy of a robust model was not checked by giving outliers in various ways. In this paper, several contamination cases have been introduced to check the adequacy of the robust model selected by robust forward selection (RFS). In each of the contamination case, the performance of RFS has been compared to standard forward selection (FS) through a simulation study. The adequacy and stability of the robust model has also been checked through a real data application. Based on simulation study and real data application, RFS has much better performance compared to standard FS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000404\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了使用任何方法作为模型选择算法,都需要检查算法选择的模型的充分性和稳定性。没有通过各种方法给出异常值来检验稳健模型的充分性。本文介绍了几个污染案例来检验鲁棒前向选择(RFS)所选择的鲁棒模型的充分性。在每种污染情况下,通过仿真研究比较了RFS与标准前向选择(FS)的性能。通过实际数据应用,验证了鲁棒模型的充分性和稳定性。通过仿真研究和实际数据应用,RFS比标准FS具有更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classical and Robust Forward Selection: A Simulation Study and Real Data Application
In order to use any method as a model selection algorithm, it is needed to check the adequacy and stability of a model selected by the algorithm. Adequacy of a robust model was not checked by giving outliers in various ways. In this paper, several contamination cases have been introduced to check the adequacy of the robust model selected by robust forward selection (RFS). In each of the contamination case, the performance of RFS has been compared to standard forward selection (FS) through a simulation study. The adequacy and stability of the robust model has also been checked through a real data application. Based on simulation study and real data application, RFS has much better performance compared to standard FS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATING THE AGE OF INITIATION OF E-CIGARETTES AMONG U.S. YOUTH: FINDINGS FROM THE POPULATION ASSESSMENT OF TOBACCO AND HEALTH (PATH) STUDY, 2013-2017. The Kumaraswamy-Rani Distribution and Its Applications Analytical Visual Methods to Describe Practice Patterns in a Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Non-Interventional Disease Registry Short Prognostic APP for Multiple Myeloma Sample Size Charts for Spearman and Kendall Coefficients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1