21世纪(或其他任何时代)伦理道德行为的自愿性:个人视角

T. Spears
{"title":"21世纪(或其他任何时代)伦理道德行为的自愿性:个人视角","authors":"T. Spears","doi":"10.4172/2155-9627.1000286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly in the modern research world there are questions raised about actions taken by academics who do now have full control of their choice of action. In the laboratory setting, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and even junior professors are often compelled to follow courses of action that are determined by their supervisors or senior members of their departments. So the question of moral determinism derives from the more fundamental question of what actions are voluntary, and to what degree — a question that has informed the thought of philosophers as far back as Aquinas and Duns Scotus. What follows is a personal reflection on currents in this line of inquiry.","PeriodicalId":93288,"journal":{"name":"General medicine and clinical practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9627.1000286","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Voluntary Nature of Ethical-Moral Behavior in the 21st Century (Or In Any Other): A Personal Perspective\",\"authors\":\"T. Spears\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9627.1000286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly in the modern research world there are questions raised about actions taken by academics who do now have full control of their choice of action. In the laboratory setting, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and even junior professors are often compelled to follow courses of action that are determined by their supervisors or senior members of their departments. So the question of moral determinism derives from the more fundamental question of what actions are voluntary, and to what degree — a question that has informed the thought of philosophers as far back as Aquinas and Duns Scotus. What follows is a personal reflection on currents in this line of inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General medicine and clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9627.1000286\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General medicine and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General medicine and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代研究界,越来越多的学者对他们所采取的行动提出了质疑,他们现在完全控制了自己的行动选择。在实验室环境中,研究生、博士后研究员甚至是初级教授经常被迫遵循他们的导师或部门高级成员所决定的行动方针。因此,道德决定论的问题源于一个更基本的问题,即什么行为是自愿的,在多大程度上是自愿的——这个问题早在阿奎那和邓斯·斯科特斯等哲学家的思想中就有体现。以下是我个人对这一探究方向的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Voluntary Nature of Ethical-Moral Behavior in the 21st Century (Or In Any Other): A Personal Perspective
Increasingly in the modern research world there are questions raised about actions taken by academics who do now have full control of their choice of action. In the laboratory setting, graduate students, postdoctoral fellows and even junior professors are often compelled to follow courses of action that are determined by their supervisors or senior members of their departments. So the question of moral determinism derives from the more fundamental question of what actions are voluntary, and to what degree — a question that has informed the thought of philosophers as far back as Aquinas and Duns Scotus. What follows is a personal reflection on currents in this line of inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Study of Neurons and Satellite Cells Under an Electron Microscope. Methodological Approaches Incidence Rate of Covid-19 Infection in People with Fourth Dose of Vaccines Bivalent Mrna from October 2022 to October 2023 in A General Medicine Office in Toledo (Spain) Longitudinal Exploration of Strategies Advancing Continuing Professional Pharmacy Education in a Major University: an in- Depth Study on Impact Comparing Drug Handling Efficiencies and Expenses for Short- Acting Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Injection Originators and Biosimilars from the Perspective of Hospital Resource Management in Formulary Decision-Making A Rare Syndrome with Tubulointerstitial Nephritis: TINU Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1