以社区精神卫生中心为例的以公开对话方式治疗创伤后精神障碍的模式

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.5114/PPN.2018.77210
Renata Wallner, Michał Kłapciński
{"title":"以社区精神卫生中心为例的以公开对话方式治疗创伤后精神障碍的模式","authors":"Renata Wallner, Michał Kłapciński","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2018.77210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this paper is to present current views on the meaning of trauma and its treatment by the use of Open Dialogue Approach (ODA). Authors broadly define trauma as mental crisis that urges an immediate and comprehensive care. Views: Open Dialogue Approach with its demand on development of professional mental health structures not only meet the requirements imposed on community mental health centre (CMHC) as a core of the National Mental Health Program, but it seems to be exceptionally useful in the context of therapeutic work with traumatized patients and with people in a mental crisis. One of the main aspect of currently carried out mental health reform is the liberalization of hospital beds for those who are in severe mental crisis, substantially the raise od hospital standard for patients admitted to psychiatric hospital and to offer an ambulatory, easily accessible (local) ways of dealing with mental health problems. Conclusions: At the core of the ODA lies a broad understanding of traumatic experience and broad perception of its symptomatic and processual consequences issuing mental crisis, which requires a fast, diverse and coordinated care. ODA may be defined as an integrative and community-oriented model of mental health service that follows constantly changing patients’ needs. Available mental health structural frame – if well-coordinated – seems sufficient and could adequately respond to patient needs in the recovery process. Further prospective and methodologically well designed studies measuring method’s treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness should be conducted.","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2018.77210","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model of treating posttraumatic disorders in the Open Dialogue Approach (ODA) exemplified by the Community Mental Health Centre (CMHC)\",\"authors\":\"Renata Wallner, Michał Kłapciński\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/PPN.2018.77210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The aim of this paper is to present current views on the meaning of trauma and its treatment by the use of Open Dialogue Approach (ODA). Authors broadly define trauma as mental crisis that urges an immediate and comprehensive care. Views: Open Dialogue Approach with its demand on development of professional mental health structures not only meet the requirements imposed on community mental health centre (CMHC) as a core of the National Mental Health Program, but it seems to be exceptionally useful in the context of therapeutic work with traumatized patients and with people in a mental crisis. One of the main aspect of currently carried out mental health reform is the liberalization of hospital beds for those who are in severe mental crisis, substantially the raise od hospital standard for patients admitted to psychiatric hospital and to offer an ambulatory, easily accessible (local) ways of dealing with mental health problems. Conclusions: At the core of the ODA lies a broad understanding of traumatic experience and broad perception of its symptomatic and processual consequences issuing mental crisis, which requires a fast, diverse and coordinated care. ODA may be defined as an integrative and community-oriented model of mental health service that follows constantly changing patients’ needs. Available mental health structural frame – if well-coordinated – seems sufficient and could adequately respond to patient needs in the recovery process. Further prospective and methodologically well designed studies measuring method’s treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness should be conducted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2018.77210\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2018.77210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2018.77210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本文的目的是通过使用开放对话方法(ODA)来介绍目前对创伤及其治疗的意义的看法。作者将创伤广义地定义为需要立即和全面护理的精神危机。观点:公开对话方法要求发展专业的精神卫生机构,这不仅符合作为国家精神卫生方案核心的社区精神卫生中心的要求,而且在治疗创伤患者和精神危机患者方面似乎特别有用。目前进行的精神卫生改革的一个主要方面是,为那些有严重精神危机的人开放医院床位,大大提高精神病医院收治病人的医院标准,并提供一种流动的、容易获得的(当地的)处理精神卫生问题的方法。结论:官方发展援助的核心在于对创伤经历的广泛理解和对其产生精神危机的症状和过程后果的广泛认识,这需要快速、多样化和协调的护理。官方发展援助可被定义为一种综合性和面向社区的精神卫生服务模式,它遵循患者不断变化的需求。现有的精神卫生结构框架——如果协调得当——似乎是足够的,可以充分满足病人在康复过程中的需要。应该进行进一步的前瞻性和方法学设计良好的研究,以测量方法的治疗结果和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A model of treating posttraumatic disorders in the Open Dialogue Approach (ODA) exemplified by the Community Mental Health Centre (CMHC)
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to present current views on the meaning of trauma and its treatment by the use of Open Dialogue Approach (ODA). Authors broadly define trauma as mental crisis that urges an immediate and comprehensive care. Views: Open Dialogue Approach with its demand on development of professional mental health structures not only meet the requirements imposed on community mental health centre (CMHC) as a core of the National Mental Health Program, but it seems to be exceptionally useful in the context of therapeutic work with traumatized patients and with people in a mental crisis. One of the main aspect of currently carried out mental health reform is the liberalization of hospital beds for those who are in severe mental crisis, substantially the raise od hospital standard for patients admitted to psychiatric hospital and to offer an ambulatory, easily accessible (local) ways of dealing with mental health problems. Conclusions: At the core of the ODA lies a broad understanding of traumatic experience and broad perception of its symptomatic and processual consequences issuing mental crisis, which requires a fast, diverse and coordinated care. ODA may be defined as an integrative and community-oriented model of mental health service that follows constantly changing patients’ needs. Available mental health structural frame – if well-coordinated – seems sufficient and could adequately respond to patient needs in the recovery process. Further prospective and methodologically well designed studies measuring method’s treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness should be conducted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii
Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
期刊最新文献
The conceptual basis of addiction memory, allostasis and dual processes, and the classical therapy of addiction. Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions Pulmonary embolism masked by symptoms of mental disorders The COVID-19 pandemic: new challenges for the mental health protection system The Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale as an instrument for assessing quality – a psychometric evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1