正义的感觉。法律世界的终结

Q4 Social Sciences Prudentia Iuris Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.249-267
L. A. Bossini
{"title":"正义的感觉。法律世界的终结","authors":"L. A. Bossini","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.249-267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This research aims to deal with the intelligible of the law and other legal phe-nomena taking into account that the finality of the law works as a principle. It shows the main alignments of the classical thinking and contrasts them with the modern thinking, which challenges the finality as a principle. When analyzing the essence of the law, which is materialized in the human behavior, the order at least appears within the notion of law, in its different dimensions.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El sentido del Derecho. La finalidad del mundo jurídico\",\"authors\":\"L. A. Bossini\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.249-267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This research aims to deal with the intelligible of the law and other legal phe-nomena taking into account that the finality of the law works as a principle. It shows the main alignments of the classical thinking and contrasts them with the modern thinking, which challenges the finality as a principle. When analyzing the essence of the law, which is materialized in the human behavior, the order at least appears within the notion of law, in its different dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.249-267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.93.2022.pp.249-267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨法律的可理解性和其他法律现象,并考虑到法律的终局性作为一种原则。它展示了古典思维的主要路线,并将其与现代思维进行了对比,挑战了作为原则的终局性。在分析物化于人的行为中的法的本质时,秩序至少以其不同的维度出现在法的概念之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El sentido del Derecho. La finalidad del mundo jurídico
: This research aims to deal with the intelligible of the law and other legal phe-nomena taking into account that the finality of the law works as a principle. It shows the main alignments of the classical thinking and contrasts them with the modern thinking, which challenges the finality as a principle. When analyzing the essence of the law, which is materialized in the human behavior, the order at least appears within the notion of law, in its different dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
La familia como fundamento del Estado Constitucional. Una investigación pretendidamente radical Comisión por omisión y causalidad La jurisprudencia en una economía con tipo de cambio múltiple. El caso de Argentina 2020-2023. ¿Francisco de Vitoria ideólogo del imperialismo? Revisión crítica de algunas interpretaciones recientes. La vigencia del derecho natural en el derecho positivo de todas las comunidades
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1