南非保健领域的互助和团结

IF 0.1 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE South African Actuarial Journal Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI:10.4314/SAAJ.V5I1.24507
H. McLeod
{"title":"南非保健领域的互助和团结","authors":"H. McLeod","doi":"10.4314/SAAJ.V5I1.24507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses Wilkie's definitions of mutuality and solidarity to review the history of private healthcare in South Africa. The vision for a future unified national healthcare system is given and the phases of reform are outlined. The first phase of reforms has been completed and these are contextualised in terms of a return to solidarity principles. The elements of a planned social healthinsurance system are described and it is shown how income cross-subsidies will further entrench the principles of solidarity. In the past, healthcare actuaries largely supported mutuality principles. The implications for the actuarial profession are suggested. Keywords : healthcare, medical schemes, social solidarity, community rating, minimum benefits, social health insurance, risk equalisation South African Actuarial Journal Vol. 5 2005: 135–167","PeriodicalId":40732,"journal":{"name":"South African Actuarial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutuality and solidarity in healthcare in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"H. McLeod\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SAAJ.V5I1.24507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses Wilkie's definitions of mutuality and solidarity to review the history of private healthcare in South Africa. The vision for a future unified national healthcare system is given and the phases of reform are outlined. The first phase of reforms has been completed and these are contextualised in terms of a return to solidarity principles. The elements of a planned social healthinsurance system are described and it is shown how income cross-subsidies will further entrench the principles of solidarity. In the past, healthcare actuaries largely supported mutuality principles. The implications for the actuarial profession are suggested. Keywords : healthcare, medical schemes, social solidarity, community rating, minimum benefits, social health insurance, risk equalisation South African Actuarial Journal Vol. 5 2005: 135–167\",\"PeriodicalId\":40732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAAJ.V5I1.24507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAAJ.V5I1.24507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

本文使用威尔基的定义相互关系和团结,以审查私营医疗保健在南非的历史。提出了未来全国统一医疗体系的设想,并概述了改革的阶段。改革的第一阶段已经完成,这些改革是在恢复团结原则的背景下进行的。描述了有计划的社会医疗保险制度的要素,并显示了收入交叉补贴将如何进一步巩固团结原则。过去,医疗保险精算师在很大程度上支持互惠原则。对精算专业的影响提出了建议。关键词:医疗保健,医疗计划,社会团结,社区评级,最低福利,社会健康保险,风险均衡南非精算杂志第5卷2005:135-167
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mutuality and solidarity in healthcare in South Africa
This paper uses Wilkie's definitions of mutuality and solidarity to review the history of private healthcare in South Africa. The vision for a future unified national healthcare system is given and the phases of reform are outlined. The first phase of reforms has been completed and these are contextualised in terms of a return to solidarity principles. The elements of a planned social healthinsurance system are described and it is shown how income cross-subsidies will further entrench the principles of solidarity. In the past, healthcare actuaries largely supported mutuality principles. The implications for the actuarial profession are suggested. Keywords : healthcare, medical schemes, social solidarity, community rating, minimum benefits, social health insurance, risk equalisation South African Actuarial Journal Vol. 5 2005: 135–167
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Actuarial Journal
South African Actuarial Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-selection in voluntary health insurance markets: A focus on medical schemes in South Africa Quantitative guidelines for retiring (more safely) in South Africa Suitability of the 2.5% net discount rate for quantum of damage calculations in South Africa An economic scenario generator for embedded derivatives in South Africa The impact of giving and receiving remittances on life insurance purchases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1