两种患者报告的反流疾病结果工具的南非荷兰语翻译的心理测量学验证

C. Rensburg, K. Kulich, J. Carlsson, I. Wiklund
{"title":"两种患者报告的反流疾病结果工具的南非荷兰语翻译的心理测量学验证","authors":"C. Rensburg, K. Kulich, J. Carlsson, I. Wiklund","doi":"10.4314/SAGR.V4I1.30726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : To verify the validity and reliability of two Afrikaans patient-reported outcomes instruments, a disease-specific and a health-related quality of life instrument in patients with reflux disease. Design : Psychometric validation study. Setting : South African, major referral gastroenterology clinic. Subjects : Consecutive patients with predominant symptoms of heartburn. Outcome measures : Patients completed the Afrikaans versions of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) and the Short Form Health-36 (SF-36). The frequency and severity of heartburn during the previous 7 days were recorded. Results : 125 patients (aged of 46.0 ±12.3 years, 74.4% female, 87% mixed race) completed the assessments. Most patients (62%) had severe symptoms and half (54%) had symptoms on more than 5 days in the previous week. Patients were most bothered by symptoms of reflux (mean GSRS score of 4.9), indigestion (4.0) and abdominal pain (4.0). These symptoms caused patients problems with food and drink (mean QOLRAD score of 3.5), emotional distress (3.6), impaired vitality (3.7) and sleep disturbance (3.8). The internal consistency of the GSRS symptom clusters was between 0.65 and 0.86 and, for QOLRAD dimensions, it was in the range 0.82 0.94. Test-retest reliability was 0.620.75 (GSRS) and 0.710.82 (QOLRAD). Relevant domains of GSRS and QOLRAD were significantly correlated. GSRS domains of abdominal pain and indigestion, and relevant QOLRAD domains, showed negative correlation with related SF-36 domains. Conclusions : The Afrikaans translations of GSRS and QOLRAD are valid and reliable instruments for use in clinical trials for the assessment of reflux symptoms and their impact on South African patients' healthrelated quality of life. South African Gastroenterology Review Vol. 4(1) 2006: 5-9","PeriodicalId":39144,"journal":{"name":"South African Gastroenterology Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric validation of the Afrikaans translation of two patient-reported outcomes instruments for reflux disease\",\"authors\":\"C. Rensburg, K. Kulich, J. Carlsson, I. Wiklund\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SAGR.V4I1.30726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives : To verify the validity and reliability of two Afrikaans patient-reported outcomes instruments, a disease-specific and a health-related quality of life instrument in patients with reflux disease. Design : Psychometric validation study. Setting : South African, major referral gastroenterology clinic. Subjects : Consecutive patients with predominant symptoms of heartburn. Outcome measures : Patients completed the Afrikaans versions of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) and the Short Form Health-36 (SF-36). The frequency and severity of heartburn during the previous 7 days were recorded. Results : 125 patients (aged of 46.0 ±12.3 years, 74.4% female, 87% mixed race) completed the assessments. Most patients (62%) had severe symptoms and half (54%) had symptoms on more than 5 days in the previous week. Patients were most bothered by symptoms of reflux (mean GSRS score of 4.9), indigestion (4.0) and abdominal pain (4.0). These symptoms caused patients problems with food and drink (mean QOLRAD score of 3.5), emotional distress (3.6), impaired vitality (3.7) and sleep disturbance (3.8). The internal consistency of the GSRS symptom clusters was between 0.65 and 0.86 and, for QOLRAD dimensions, it was in the range 0.82 0.94. Test-retest reliability was 0.620.75 (GSRS) and 0.710.82 (QOLRAD). Relevant domains of GSRS and QOLRAD were significantly correlated. GSRS domains of abdominal pain and indigestion, and relevant QOLRAD domains, showed negative correlation with related SF-36 domains. Conclusions : The Afrikaans translations of GSRS and QOLRAD are valid and reliable instruments for use in clinical trials for the assessment of reflux symptoms and their impact on South African patients' healthrelated quality of life. South African Gastroenterology Review Vol. 4(1) 2006: 5-9\",\"PeriodicalId\":39144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Gastroenterology Review\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"5-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Gastroenterology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAGR.V4I1.30726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Gastroenterology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SAGR.V4I1.30726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:验证两种南非荷兰患者报告的结果工具的有效性和可靠性,一种是疾病特异性工具,另一种是与健康相关的生活质量工具。设计:心理测量验证研究。环境:南非,主要转诊胃肠病学诊所。研究对象:以胃灼热为主要症状的连续患者。结果测量:患者完成了南非荷兰语版胃肠症状评定量表(GSRS)、反流和消化不良生活质量问卷(QOLRAD)和简明健康-36 (SF-36)。记录前7天胃灼热的频率和严重程度。结果:125例患者完成评估,年龄46.0±12.3岁,女性74.4%,混血儿87%。大多数患者(62%)有严重症状,一半(54%)在前一周出现症状超过5天。患者最困扰的症状是反流(GSRS平均评分4.9)、消化不良(4.0)和腹痛(4.0)。这些症状导致患者出现饮食问题(QOLRAD平均评分为3.5)、情绪困扰(3.6)、活力受损(3.7)和睡眠障碍(3.8)。GSRS症状群的内部一致性在0.65 ~ 0.86之间,QOLRAD维度的内部一致性在0.82 ~ 0.94之间。重测信度分别为0.620.75 (GSRS)和0.710.82 (QOLRAD)。GSRS和QOLRAD的相关域呈显著相关。腹痛、消化不良的GSRS结构域及相关QOLRAD结构域与相关SF-36结构域呈负相关。结论:南非荷兰语翻译的GSRS和QOLRAD是临床试验中评估反流症状及其对南非患者健康相关生活质量影响的有效和可靠的工具。南非胃肠病学评论Vol. 4(1) 2006: 5-9
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric validation of the Afrikaans translation of two patient-reported outcomes instruments for reflux disease
Objectives : To verify the validity and reliability of two Afrikaans patient-reported outcomes instruments, a disease-specific and a health-related quality of life instrument in patients with reflux disease. Design : Psychometric validation study. Setting : South African, major referral gastroenterology clinic. Subjects : Consecutive patients with predominant symptoms of heartburn. Outcome measures : Patients completed the Afrikaans versions of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) and the Short Form Health-36 (SF-36). The frequency and severity of heartburn during the previous 7 days were recorded. Results : 125 patients (aged of 46.0 ±12.3 years, 74.4% female, 87% mixed race) completed the assessments. Most patients (62%) had severe symptoms and half (54%) had symptoms on more than 5 days in the previous week. Patients were most bothered by symptoms of reflux (mean GSRS score of 4.9), indigestion (4.0) and abdominal pain (4.0). These symptoms caused patients problems with food and drink (mean QOLRAD score of 3.5), emotional distress (3.6), impaired vitality (3.7) and sleep disturbance (3.8). The internal consistency of the GSRS symptom clusters was between 0.65 and 0.86 and, for QOLRAD dimensions, it was in the range 0.82 0.94. Test-retest reliability was 0.620.75 (GSRS) and 0.710.82 (QOLRAD). Relevant domains of GSRS and QOLRAD were significantly correlated. GSRS domains of abdominal pain and indigestion, and relevant QOLRAD domains, showed negative correlation with related SF-36 domains. Conclusions : The Afrikaans translations of GSRS and QOLRAD are valid and reliable instruments for use in clinical trials for the assessment of reflux symptoms and their impact on South African patients' healthrelated quality of life. South African Gastroenterology Review Vol. 4(1) 2006: 5-9
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Gastroenterology Review
South African Gastroenterology Review Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Private Practice Review: A time bomb of resentment is ticking among doctors who are subjected to government and third-party payers interfering with the doctor-patient relationship A Clinical Audit of Colonoscopy in a Gastroenterology Unit at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in South Africa Viral Hepatitis and HIV co-infection Management of Clostridium Difficile : case study and review of the basic tenets : case report Achalasia complicated by squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus : case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1