除草剂在南美洲的使用历史和前景

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES Advances in Weed Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.51694/advweedsci/2022;40:seventy-five010
A. Merotto, D. Gazziero, Maxwel C. Oliveira, J. Scursoni, M. A. Garcia, R. Figueroa, G. Turra
{"title":"除草剂在南美洲的使用历史和前景","authors":"A. Merotto, D. Gazziero, Maxwel C. Oliveira, J. Scursoni, M. A. Garcia, R. Figueroa, G. Turra","doi":"10.51694/advweedsci/2022;40:seventy-five010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background : Agriculture in South America (SA) had a great expansion in the last decades and weed control changed accordingly with region and crop practices. Objective : The objective of this review is to present the history of herbicide use and discuss the main changes in weed management in SA. Methods : Herbicide use quantities were obtained from official institutions and commercial organizations in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay. Data were summarized per active ingredient, herbicide mode of action or crop. The evolution of the cultivated area of the main crops in each country, and the crop and weed management associated to it were considered to discuss the importance and the consequences of the main herbicides used. Results : In 2019 the most used herbicides in Brazil were glyphosate, 2,4-D, atrazine, paraquat and diuron representing 62, 15, 7, 5 and 2% of the total amount used. In Argentina, the increasing selection of herbicide resistant populations (4 cases/year), resulted in utilization of older chemistries. Weed control in Uruguay is traditionally benefited from crop/pasture rotations but recently is also facing problems of continuous cropping systems. Agriculture in Chile is more diverse, but similar patterns and problems of herbicide use are present. Conclusions : Intensification of agriculture, no-tillage, glyphosate resistant crops, and herbicide resistant weeds were the most important drivers of herbicide use changes in SA. Integrated weed management is unpostponable to provide sustainable increasing food production in SA.","PeriodicalId":29845,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Weed Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbicide use history and perspective in South America\",\"authors\":\"A. Merotto, D. Gazziero, Maxwel C. Oliveira, J. Scursoni, M. A. Garcia, R. Figueroa, G. Turra\",\"doi\":\"10.51694/advweedsci/2022;40:seventy-five010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background : Agriculture in South America (SA) had a great expansion in the last decades and weed control changed accordingly with region and crop practices. Objective : The objective of this review is to present the history of herbicide use and discuss the main changes in weed management in SA. Methods : Herbicide use quantities were obtained from official institutions and commercial organizations in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay. Data were summarized per active ingredient, herbicide mode of action or crop. The evolution of the cultivated area of the main crops in each country, and the crop and weed management associated to it were considered to discuss the importance and the consequences of the main herbicides used. Results : In 2019 the most used herbicides in Brazil were glyphosate, 2,4-D, atrazine, paraquat and diuron representing 62, 15, 7, 5 and 2% of the total amount used. In Argentina, the increasing selection of herbicide resistant populations (4 cases/year), resulted in utilization of older chemistries. Weed control in Uruguay is traditionally benefited from crop/pasture rotations but recently is also facing problems of continuous cropping systems. Agriculture in Chile is more diverse, but similar patterns and problems of herbicide use are present. Conclusions : Intensification of agriculture, no-tillage, glyphosate resistant crops, and herbicide resistant weeds were the most important drivers of herbicide use changes in SA. Integrated weed management is unpostponable to provide sustainable increasing food production in SA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Weed Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Weed Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51694/advweedsci/2022;40:seventy-five010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Weed Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51694/advweedsci/2022;40:seventy-five010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:在过去的几十年里,南美洲的农业有了很大的发展,杂草的控制也随着地区和作物的做法而发生了相应的变化。目的:介绍南达科他州除草剂使用的历史,并讨论南达科他州杂草管理的主要变化。方法:从阿根廷、巴西、智利、巴拉圭和乌拉圭的官方机构和商业组织获取除草剂使用量。按有效成分、除草剂作用方式或作物对数据进行了总结。每个国家主要作物种植面积的演变,以及与之相关的作物和杂草管理,讨论了使用主要除草剂的重要性和后果。结果:2019年巴西使用最多的除草剂是草甘膦、2,4- d、阿特拉津、百草枯和迪乌龙,分别占总使用量的62%、15%、7.5%、5%和2%。在阿根廷,越来越多的除草剂抗性种群选择(每年4例)导致使用较旧的化学品。乌拉圭的杂草控制传统上得益于作物/牧场轮作,但最近也面临连作系统的问题。智利的农业更加多样化,但也存在类似的除草剂使用模式和问题。结论:农业集约化、免耕、抗草甘膦作物和抗除草剂杂草是南北方除草剂使用变化的最重要驱动因素。综合杂草管理是不可推迟的,以提供可持续增长的粮食生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Herbicide use history and perspective in South America
: Background : Agriculture in South America (SA) had a great expansion in the last decades and weed control changed accordingly with region and crop practices. Objective : The objective of this review is to present the history of herbicide use and discuss the main changes in weed management in SA. Methods : Herbicide use quantities were obtained from official institutions and commercial organizations in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay. Data were summarized per active ingredient, herbicide mode of action or crop. The evolution of the cultivated area of the main crops in each country, and the crop and weed management associated to it were considered to discuss the importance and the consequences of the main herbicides used. Results : In 2019 the most used herbicides in Brazil were glyphosate, 2,4-D, atrazine, paraquat and diuron representing 62, 15, 7, 5 and 2% of the total amount used. In Argentina, the increasing selection of herbicide resistant populations (4 cases/year), resulted in utilization of older chemistries. Weed control in Uruguay is traditionally benefited from crop/pasture rotations but recently is also facing problems of continuous cropping systems. Agriculture in Chile is more diverse, but similar patterns and problems of herbicide use are present. Conclusions : Intensification of agriculture, no-tillage, glyphosate resistant crops, and herbicide resistant weeds were the most important drivers of herbicide use changes in SA. Integrated weed management is unpostponable to provide sustainable increasing food production in SA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Weed Science
Advances in Weed Science PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
42.90%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Shortening critical period of weed control at soybean by residual herbicide mixtures Introduction and management of Amaranthus palmeri in Brazil Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud) Resistant to ACCase and ALS inhibitors in northeastern Iran Use of inhibitors and protectors in the tolerance of white oat cultivars to the penoxsulam herbicide The effect of environmental factors on seed germination and emergence of cutleaf geranium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1