鞋类视觉感知的性别差异

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Affective Engineering Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-20-00034
Shih-hung Cheng, Chieh-Ju Lee
{"title":"鞋类视觉感知的性别差异","authors":"Shih-hung Cheng, Chieh-Ju Lee","doi":"10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-20-00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study explores the differences in visual perception of footwear based on gender by conducting semantic differential evaluations and classification tasks. Cluster and factor analyses were performed to analyze the similarities and factors in footwear styles, respectively. The cluster analysis results indicated that leather shoes and sneakers were the major styles clearly distinguished by the participants. Fancy leather shoes, described as “fancy and exaggerated” by men, and as “elegant and refined” by women, was the consensus style. Women emphasized on fashion and were more likely to perceive footwear integral to their outfit, whereas men valued the functionality of footwear and treated it as a tool. The factor analysis on footwear styles extracted four male factors: evaluation, attention, feature, and protection; and four female factors for: evaluation, charm, volume, and coverage. Women were more sensitive to the volume and weight of footwear, and were also more likely to sense its coverage.","PeriodicalId":41579,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Affective Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Footwear Visual Perception\",\"authors\":\"Shih-hung Cheng, Chieh-Ju Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-20-00034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This study explores the differences in visual perception of footwear based on gender by conducting semantic differential evaluations and classification tasks. Cluster and factor analyses were performed to analyze the similarities and factors in footwear styles, respectively. The cluster analysis results indicated that leather shoes and sneakers were the major styles clearly distinguished by the participants. Fancy leather shoes, described as “fancy and exaggerated” by men, and as “elegant and refined” by women, was the consensus style. Women emphasized on fashion and were more likely to perceive footwear integral to their outfit, whereas men valued the functionality of footwear and treated it as a tool. The factor analysis on footwear styles extracted four male factors: evaluation, attention, feature, and protection; and four female factors for: evaluation, charm, volume, and coverage. Women were more sensitive to the volume and weight of footwear, and were also more likely to sense its coverage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Affective Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Affective Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-20-00034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Affective Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-20-00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过语义差异评价和分类任务,探讨了性别对鞋类视觉感知的差异。通过聚类分析和因子分析,分别分析鞋类风格的相似性和影响因素。聚类分析结果表明,皮鞋和运动鞋是参与者明显区分的主要款式。花式皮鞋,被男性形容为“花哨和夸张”,被女性形容为“优雅和精致”,是普遍的风格。女性强调时尚,更有可能将鞋子视为服装不可或缺的一部分,而男性则看重鞋子的功能,并将其视为一种工具。鞋型因素分析提取了评价、关注、特征、防护四个男性因素;还有四个女性因素:评价、魅力、体积和覆盖范围。女性对鞋子的体积和重量更敏感,也更容易感觉到鞋子的覆盖范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Differences in Footwear Visual Perception
: This study explores the differences in visual perception of footwear based on gender by conducting semantic differential evaluations and classification tasks. Cluster and factor analyses were performed to analyze the similarities and factors in footwear styles, respectively. The cluster analysis results indicated that leather shoes and sneakers were the major styles clearly distinguished by the participants. Fancy leather shoes, described as “fancy and exaggerated” by men, and as “elegant and refined” by women, was the consensus style. Women emphasized on fashion and were more likely to perceive footwear integral to their outfit, whereas men valued the functionality of footwear and treated it as a tool. The factor analysis on footwear styles extracted four male factors: evaluation, attention, feature, and protection; and four female factors for: evaluation, charm, volume, and coverage. Women were more sensitive to the volume and weight of footwear, and were also more likely to sense its coverage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Facial Attractiveness Factors and their Learning Processes by Comparing the Results of Class Activation Mapping-based Visualization Methods Using Convolutional Neural Networks The Influence of Motion Factors on Perception of Motion in VR Spaces Swarm Intelligence Inspired Approach for Dynamic Tracking of Members’ Interests in Online Discussion Groups Fifty-selective SSVEP-BCI Speller with CCA Connectionist Interpretation of Affective Phenomenon Caused by Odd Number of Acoustic Beats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1