使用价值、交换价值与公共土地使用规划的必要性

G. Pivo
{"title":"使用价值、交换价值与公共土地使用规划的必要性","authors":"G. Pivo","doi":"10.5070/BP31113211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Pivo, Gary E. | Abstract: Why should the government be in the business of influencing how our society uses urban and rural land? The answer to this question is important to professional city and regional planners wishing to justify their programs, and to land-use theorists seeking to understand the forces behind land-use patterns.The allocation of land can be conducted by either public planning or by the private market. Both methods have their drawbacks and advantages. While it is necessary to understand both systems, as they work alone and together, this essay will focus on the market approach. Many would like to see the market used as the primary system for allocating land. In response to this position, this essay will present a critique of the land market and a justification for land-use planning by examining the nature of land as a commodity in market economies.","PeriodicalId":39937,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Planning Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/BP31113211","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use Value, Exchange Value, and the Need for Public Land-Use Planning\",\"authors\":\"G. Pivo\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/BP31113211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Pivo, Gary E. | Abstract: Why should the government be in the business of influencing how our society uses urban and rural land? The answer to this question is important to professional city and regional planners wishing to justify their programs, and to land-use theorists seeking to understand the forces behind land-use patterns.The allocation of land can be conducted by either public planning or by the private market. Both methods have their drawbacks and advantages. While it is necessary to understand both systems, as they work alone and together, this essay will focus on the market approach. Many would like to see the market used as the primary system for allocating land. In response to this position, this essay will present a critique of the land market and a justification for land-use planning by examining the nature of land as a commodity in market economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/BP31113211\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Planning Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/BP31113211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Planning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/BP31113211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要:为什么政府应该介入影响社会对城乡土地的利用?这个问题的答案对于希望证明其规划合理性的专业城市和区域规划者以及试图理解土地利用模式背后力量的土地利用理论家来说非常重要。土地分配既可以通过公共规划进行,也可以通过私人市场进行。两种方法各有优缺点。虽然有必要了解这两个系统,因为他们单独和一起工作,这篇文章将集中在市场方法。许多人希望看到市场被用作分配土地的主要制度。为了回应这一立场,本文将通过考察土地作为市场经济中商品的性质,对土地市场进行批评,并为土地使用规划提供理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use Value, Exchange Value, and the Need for Public Land-Use Planning
Author(s): Pivo, Gary E. | Abstract: Why should the government be in the business of influencing how our society uses urban and rural land? The answer to this question is important to professional city and regional planners wishing to justify their programs, and to land-use theorists seeking to understand the forces behind land-use patterns.The allocation of land can be conducted by either public planning or by the private market. Both methods have their drawbacks and advantages. While it is necessary to understand both systems, as they work alone and together, this essay will focus on the market approach. Many would like to see the market used as the primary system for allocating land. In response to this position, this essay will present a critique of the land market and a justification for land-use planning by examining the nature of land as a commodity in market economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Berkeley Planning Journal
Berkeley Planning Journal Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Berkeley Planning Journal is an annual peer-reviewed journal, published by graduate students in the Department of City and Regional Planning (DCRP) at the University of California, Berkeley since 1985.
期刊最新文献
Learning to Share: Outdoor Commercial Spaces on San Francisco's Valencia Street Decolonising Myself: Navigating the Researcher-Activist Identity in the Urban South Pacific COVID-19 and the Future of Urban Life How to Save Chinatown: Preserving affordability and community service through ethnic retail Urban Bites and Agrarian Bytes: Digital Agriculture and Extended Urbanization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1