民主与全球选举性别配额的采用。

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Comparative Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5129/001041522x16222193902161
Pär Zetterberg, Elin Bjarnegård, Melanie M Hughes, Pamela Paxton
{"title":"民主与全球选举性别配额的采用。","authors":"Pär Zetterberg, Elin Bjarnegård, Melanie M Hughes, Pamela Paxton","doi":"10.5129/001041522x16222193902161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47960,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy and the Adoption of Electoral Gender Quotas Worldwide.\",\"authors\":\"Pär Zetterberg, Elin Bjarnegård, Melanie M Hughes, Pamela Paxton\",\"doi\":\"10.5129/001041522x16222193902161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":47960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522x16222193902161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522x16222193902161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将性别配额法律的全球和纵向数据理论化并加以利用,以研究民主的水平和维度如何影响不同配额类型的采用。我们的研究结果表明,处于中等民主水平的国家更有可能采用配额制度。在这组不同的国家中,选举竞争程度相对较低(即政治权利有限)的国家最有可能采用保留席位。另一方面,在保护公民自由(即个人结社自由等)程度适中的国家,采用候选人配额的可能性最高。我们的研究结果表明,民主的不同层次和维度为政治行为者提供了激励和约束,从而创造了不同的配额采用轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democracy and the Adoption of Electoral Gender Quotas Worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Politics
Comparative Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Comparative Politics, an international journal presenting scholarly articles devoted to the comparative analysis of political institutions and processes,communicates new ideas and research findings to social scientists, scholars, students, and public and NGO officials. The journal is indispensable to experts in universities, research organizations, foundations, embassies, and policymaking agencies throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
The Nature of Ideology in Urban China International Competitive Involvement during Democratic Transitions and State Repression The “Weight” of Territorial Issues: Evidence from Catalonia, Scotland, and Northern Ireland The Political Economy of “Green” Regulation: Evidence from Fuel Price Markets Will the Revolution Be Televised? Party Organization, Media Activism, and the Communication Strategies of Left-Wing Governments in Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1