重新审视知识产权的投资机会

Asna Ahmed, Ahmar Afaq, Rupal Chhaya
{"title":"重新审视知识产权的投资机会","authors":"Asna Ahmed, Ahmar Afaq, Rupal Chhaya","doi":"10.56042/jipr.v27i5.63582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study shall assess the various modes and kinds of investments in the recent past and how the investment in intangibles has witnessed growth in the recent decade. This doctrinal study found that Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as an investment has been in use since the late 1900s in various international agreements, apart from the traditional methods of investment in IPR such as, licensing, assignment, and securitization. Though, some countries do not have legislations to deal with the traditional methods of investment, International Investment Agreements (IIAs) have been a driving force for the investments in IPR. Since the advent of such an agreement, countries have always mentioned IP protection as an essential clause. However, the differing laws of the countries paved the way for varied definitions and kinds of IP protection. It has been found from the existing literature that at the present, most IIAs have emphasized investor protection priority over IP protection which also forms an essential part of the agreement. This requires that there be adequate laws to supplement the agreements at both the domestic and international levels. The IP forming the heart of the agreement should be given priority in terms of protection coupled with adequate redressal mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":39166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Investment Opportunities in Intellectual Property\",\"authors\":\"Asna Ahmed, Ahmar Afaq, Rupal Chhaya\",\"doi\":\"10.56042/jipr.v27i5.63582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study shall assess the various modes and kinds of investments in the recent past and how the investment in intangibles has witnessed growth in the recent decade. This doctrinal study found that Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as an investment has been in use since the late 1900s in various international agreements, apart from the traditional methods of investment in IPR such as, licensing, assignment, and securitization. Though, some countries do not have legislations to deal with the traditional methods of investment, International Investment Agreements (IIAs) have been a driving force for the investments in IPR. Since the advent of such an agreement, countries have always mentioned IP protection as an essential clause. However, the differing laws of the countries paved the way for varied definitions and kinds of IP protection. It has been found from the existing literature that at the present, most IIAs have emphasized investor protection priority over IP protection which also forms an essential part of the agreement. This requires that there be adequate laws to supplement the agreements at both the domestic and international levels. The IP forming the heart of the agreement should be given priority in terms of protection coupled with adequate redressal mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v27i5.63582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v27i5.63582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究将评估最近的各种投资模式和种类,以及近十年来无形资产投资的增长情况。本理论研究发现,自20世纪后期以来,除了传统的知识产权投资方法(如许可、转让和证券化)外,知识产权作为一种投资已经在各种国际协议中使用。虽然一些国家没有立法来处理传统的投资方式,但国际投资协定(IIAs)一直是推动知识产权投资的动力。自该协定诞生以来,各国一直将知识产权保护作为基本条款。然而,各国不同的法律为知识产权保护的不同定义和种类铺平了道路。从现有文献中可以发现,目前大多数国际投资协定都强调投资者保护优先于知识产权保护,知识产权保护也是协定的重要组成部分。这就要求有足够的法律来补充国内和国际两级的协定。对于构成协议核心的知识产权,应给予优先保护,并辅以适当的补救机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the Investment Opportunities in Intellectual Property
The present study shall assess the various modes and kinds of investments in the recent past and how the investment in intangibles has witnessed growth in the recent decade. This doctrinal study found that Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as an investment has been in use since the late 1900s in various international agreements, apart from the traditional methods of investment in IPR such as, licensing, assignment, and securitization. Though, some countries do not have legislations to deal with the traditional methods of investment, International Investment Agreements (IIAs) have been a driving force for the investments in IPR. Since the advent of such an agreement, countries have always mentioned IP protection as an essential clause. However, the differing laws of the countries paved the way for varied definitions and kinds of IP protection. It has been found from the existing literature that at the present, most IIAs have emphasized investor protection priority over IP protection which also forms an essential part of the agreement. This requires that there be adequate laws to supplement the agreements at both the domestic and international levels. The IP forming the heart of the agreement should be given priority in terms of protection coupled with adequate redressal mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The Interplay between Contemporary Art and Copyright Law Ethics and IPR - Much Needed Legal Solutions for Tomorrow Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Third Decade of Twenty-First Century (2020–2023) — VI Economic Justification of Traditional knowledge with Insights from Identity Economics Pre-Grant Opposition: CSIR v Ms Hindustan Lever Limited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1