腰椎棘突分层切开术的定量解剖分析和临床应用

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Turkish neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42396-22.2
Ji Xu, Runpei Wang, Xiaodong Wang, Zhengcun Yan, Xingdong Wang, Min Wei, Yuping Li, Hengzhu Zhang
{"title":"腰椎棘突分层切开术的定量解剖分析和临床应用","authors":"Ji Xu, Runpei Wang, Xiaodong Wang, Zhengcun Yan, Xingdong Wang, Min Wei, Yuping Li, Hengzhu Zhang","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42396-22.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the feasibility and safety of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy by quantitative anatomic analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Nine fresh adult human cadaveric specimens (including 45 lumbar segments) were divided into 3 groups randomly. The simulated operations and anatomic measurements were performed to evaluate the visibility angle and surgical corridor at different retraction widths (8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm). By measuring the width causing bony fracture in 45 lumbar segments, the safety margin of retraction width was determined. The findings of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy in one typical case were presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 8 mm retraction width, there was not enough surgical corridor for the operation procedures. At 10 mm and 12 mm retraction width, all operation procedures could be conducted smoothly. The 12 mm group presented a larger surgical corridor and shorter operative time compared with the 10 mm group. The imaging examination confirmed no bony fracture and articular capsule impairment. The visibility angle and exposure extent increased in proportion to the retraction width. The retraction width that resulted in the bony fracture ranged from 12.34 mm to 16.82 mm, with an average of (14.56 ± 1.73) mm. The positions of fracture were in the pedicle of the vertebral arch (68.9%), the lamina (26.7%), and the vertebral body (4.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retraction width of 10 mm-12 mm is safe and effective. The micromanipulations such as tumor resection, nervous exploration, dural suture, etc. can be conducted smoothly via the surgical corridor. In addition, the retraction width of 12.34~16.82 mm could serve as a safety margin for surgical planning. Our findings may provide a quantitative reference for clinical application of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23395,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Anatomic Analysis and Clinical Application of Lumbar Spinous Process Split Laminotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Xu, Runpei Wang, Xiaodong Wang, Zhengcun Yan, Xingdong Wang, Min Wei, Yuping Li, Hengzhu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42396-22.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the feasibility and safety of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy by quantitative anatomic analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Nine fresh adult human cadaveric specimens (including 45 lumbar segments) were divided into 3 groups randomly. The simulated operations and anatomic measurements were performed to evaluate the visibility angle and surgical corridor at different retraction widths (8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm). By measuring the width causing bony fracture in 45 lumbar segments, the safety margin of retraction width was determined. The findings of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy in one typical case were presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 8 mm retraction width, there was not enough surgical corridor for the operation procedures. At 10 mm and 12 mm retraction width, all operation procedures could be conducted smoothly. The 12 mm group presented a larger surgical corridor and shorter operative time compared with the 10 mm group. The imaging examination confirmed no bony fracture and articular capsule impairment. The visibility angle and exposure extent increased in proportion to the retraction width. The retraction width that resulted in the bony fracture ranged from 12.34 mm to 16.82 mm, with an average of (14.56 ± 1.73) mm. The positions of fracture were in the pedicle of the vertebral arch (68.9%), the lamina (26.7%), and the vertebral body (4.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The retraction width of 10 mm-12 mm is safe and effective. The micromanipulations such as tumor resection, nervous exploration, dural suture, etc. can be conducted smoothly via the surgical corridor. In addition, the retraction width of 12.34~16.82 mm could serve as a safety margin for surgical planning. Our findings may provide a quantitative reference for clinical application of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42396-22.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42396-22.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过定量解剖分析研究腰椎棘突椎板劈开术的可行性和安全性:将 9 具新鲜成人尸体标本(包括 45 个腰椎节段)随机分为 3 组。进行模拟手术和解剖测量,以评估不同牵引宽度(8 毫米、10 毫米和 12 毫米)下的可见角度和手术走廊。通过测量 45 个腰椎节段造成骨性骨折的宽度,确定了牵引宽度的安全系数。结果:结果:当牵引宽度为 8 毫米时,手术走廊不足以进行手术。当牵引宽度为 10 毫米和 12 毫米时,所有手术均能顺利进行。与 10 毫米组相比,12 毫米组的手术走廊更大,手术时间更短。影像学检查证实无骨性骨折和关节囊损伤。可见角度和暴露范围随牵引宽度的增加而增加。导致骨性骨折的牵引宽度从 12.34 毫米到 16.82 毫米不等,平均为(14.56 ± 1.73)毫米。骨折位置分别位于椎弓根(68.9%)、椎板(26.7%)和椎体(4.4%):结论:10 毫米至 12 毫米的牵引宽度是安全有效的。结论:10 毫米至 12 毫米的牵引宽度安全有效,肿瘤切除、神经探查、硬脑膜缝合等显微操作可通过手术走廊顺利进行。此外,12.34 毫米至 16.82 毫米的牵引宽度可作为手术规划的安全系数。我们的研究结果可为腰椎棘突分层切开术的临床应用提供定量参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative Anatomic Analysis and Clinical Application of Lumbar Spinous Process Split Laminotomy.

Aim: To investigate the feasibility and safety of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy by quantitative anatomic analysis.

Material and methods: Nine fresh adult human cadaveric specimens (including 45 lumbar segments) were divided into 3 groups randomly. The simulated operations and anatomic measurements were performed to evaluate the visibility angle and surgical corridor at different retraction widths (8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm). By measuring the width causing bony fracture in 45 lumbar segments, the safety margin of retraction width was determined. The findings of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy in one typical case were presented.

Results: At 8 mm retraction width, there was not enough surgical corridor for the operation procedures. At 10 mm and 12 mm retraction width, all operation procedures could be conducted smoothly. The 12 mm group presented a larger surgical corridor and shorter operative time compared with the 10 mm group. The imaging examination confirmed no bony fracture and articular capsule impairment. The visibility angle and exposure extent increased in proportion to the retraction width. The retraction width that resulted in the bony fracture ranged from 12.34 mm to 16.82 mm, with an average of (14.56 ± 1.73) mm. The positions of fracture were in the pedicle of the vertebral arch (68.9%), the lamina (26.7%), and the vertebral body (4.4%).

Conclusion: The retraction width of 10 mm-12 mm is safe and effective. The micromanipulations such as tumor resection, nervous exploration, dural suture, etc. can be conducted smoothly via the surgical corridor. In addition, the retraction width of 12.34~16.82 mm could serve as a safety margin for surgical planning. Our findings may provide a quantitative reference for clinical application of lumbar spinous process split laminotomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish neurosurgery
Turkish neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Turkish Neurosurgery is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access and totally free journal directed at an audience of neurosurgery physicians and scientists. The official language of the journal is English. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Turkish Neurosurgery will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) approval and have strictly observed an acceptable follow-up period. With the exception of reference presentation, Turkish Neurosurgery requires that all manuscripts be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
期刊最新文献
Changes in the Lumbosacral Angle after Spinal Cord Untethering in 23 Children with Tethered Cord Syndrome. Multiple Pathway-Dephosphorylated ASK-1 Confers Temozolomide-Resistance to Human Glioma Cells. A Nomogram Model for Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Medulloblastoma. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with the Polymethyl Methacrylate - Gelatin Sponge Complex in the Treatment of Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Accompanied by Superior Endplate Injurie. Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Clinical Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1