收获方向和行距对水田脱棉棉性能的影响

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.56454/bnwi2396
M. Roozbeh, M. Zahiri
{"title":"收获方向和行距对水田脱棉棉性能的影响","authors":"M. Roozbeh, M. Zahiri","doi":"10.56454/bnwi2396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cotton is picked manually in Fars Province, Iran. It is not only a slow, labor-intensive operation, but extremely tedious, hard work. Due to scarcity of labor at harvesting time, mechanization of cotton harvesting is of vital importance. Therefore, a field study was conducted to evaluate the interactive effects of harvesting directions (in the rows, cross, and oblique, or skew) and row spacing (24-, 36-, and 70-cm) on cotton stripper performance. Results showed that different harvesting directions and row spacing had a significant effect on seed cotton loss. Maximum seed cotton loss was observed in the row direction treatment and minimum loss occurred in the skew treatment. The findings revealed that maximum loss was obtained from row spacing of 70 cm. Overall, these results demonstrated that cotton grown in 36-cm rows and harvested in a skewed or oblique direction had a greater impact on the reduction of seed cotton losses and produced seed cotton yield higher than the 70-cm rows harvested in the rows direction.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Harvesting Direction and Row Spacing on the Cotton Stripper Performance in Irrigated Cotton Fields\",\"authors\":\"M. Roozbeh, M. Zahiri\",\"doi\":\"10.56454/bnwi2396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cotton is picked manually in Fars Province, Iran. It is not only a slow, labor-intensive operation, but extremely tedious, hard work. Due to scarcity of labor at harvesting time, mechanization of cotton harvesting is of vital importance. Therefore, a field study was conducted to evaluate the interactive effects of harvesting directions (in the rows, cross, and oblique, or skew) and row spacing (24-, 36-, and 70-cm) on cotton stripper performance. Results showed that different harvesting directions and row spacing had a significant effect on seed cotton loss. Maximum seed cotton loss was observed in the row direction treatment and minimum loss occurred in the skew treatment. The findings revealed that maximum loss was obtained from row spacing of 70 cm. Overall, these results demonstrated that cotton grown in 36-cm rows and harvested in a skewed or oblique direction had a greater impact on the reduction of seed cotton losses and produced seed cotton yield higher than the 70-cm rows harvested in the rows direction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56454/bnwi2396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/bnwi2396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在伊朗法尔斯省,棉花是手工采摘的。这不仅是一项缓慢、劳动密集型的操作,而且是一项极其繁琐、艰苦的工作。由于采收时劳动力稀缺,棉花收获机械化至关重要。因此,本研究通过田间试验,评估了采棉方向(行、横、斜或斜)和行距(24、36和70 cm)对棉花脱棉性能的交互影响。结果表明,不同收获方向和行距对籽棉损失有显著影响。行向处理籽棉损失最大,斜向处理籽棉损失最小。结果表明,行距为70 cm时损失最大。综上所述,36 cm行距和斜向收获对减少籽棉损失的影响更大,籽棉产量高于70 cm行距和斜向收获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Harvesting Direction and Row Spacing on the Cotton Stripper Performance in Irrigated Cotton Fields
Cotton is picked manually in Fars Province, Iran. It is not only a slow, labor-intensive operation, but extremely tedious, hard work. Due to scarcity of labor at harvesting time, mechanization of cotton harvesting is of vital importance. Therefore, a field study was conducted to evaluate the interactive effects of harvesting directions (in the rows, cross, and oblique, or skew) and row spacing (24-, 36-, and 70-cm) on cotton stripper performance. Results showed that different harvesting directions and row spacing had a significant effect on seed cotton loss. Maximum seed cotton loss was observed in the row direction treatment and minimum loss occurred in the skew treatment. The findings revealed that maximum loss was obtained from row spacing of 70 cm. Overall, these results demonstrated that cotton grown in 36-cm rows and harvested in a skewed or oblique direction had a greater impact on the reduction of seed cotton losses and produced seed cotton yield higher than the 70-cm rows harvested in the rows direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1