水量和沉积对助收效果的影响

IF 0.7 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Journal of cotton science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.56454/pqlq9690
J. A. Griffin, Seth A. Byrd, G. Morgan, A. Dabney, T. Raper, D. Dodds, R. Norton, Andrea S. Jones, G. Collins, T. Cutts, K. Edmisten, Shawn A. Butler
{"title":"水量和沉积对助收效果的影响","authors":"J. A. Griffin, Seth A. Byrd, G. Morgan, A. Dabney, T. Raper, D. Dodds, R. Norton, Andrea S. Jones, G. Collins, T. Cutts, K. Edmisten, Shawn A. Butler","doi":"10.56454/pqlq9690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harvest aids provide cotton farmers with the ability to harvest in an efficient and timely manner. Harvest aids also assistant in preserving overall fiber quality by reducing fiber degradation and discoloration from exposure to weather and by the reduction of foreign matter. Many harvest-aid active ingredients do not translocate within the plant, thus adequate spray coverage is recommended to improve efficacy of these products. The widespread and rapid adoption of auxin-tolerant cotton varieties has increased the use of larger droplet size nozzles that are required for use with auxin herbicides. Subsequently, the use of larger droplet size nozzles for harvest-aid applications will likely increase. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of droplet size and carrier volume on defoliation, desiccation, boll opening, terminal and basal regrowth, and cotton leaf grade. Varying water volumes of 47, 93, 140, and 187 L ha-1, and nozzles that produced fine, medium, and ultra-coarse droplets were evaluated at 14 site years across the Cotton Belt in 2016 and 2017. Numeric trends indicate higher carrier volumes are more successful at defoliating and opening bolls than lower carrier volumes. Water volumes of 47 L ha-1 should be avoided when making cotton harvest-aid applications, as all defoliation, open boll, and regrowth values were consistently reduced at the lowest carrier volume. Treatments of various nozzle types had less impact on harvest-aid efficacy than carrier volume. Site interactions with harvest aids had a greater effect than nozzle type or water volume.","PeriodicalId":15558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cotton science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water Volume and Deposition Effects on Harvest-Aid Efficacy\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Griffin, Seth A. Byrd, G. Morgan, A. Dabney, T. Raper, D. Dodds, R. Norton, Andrea S. Jones, G. Collins, T. Cutts, K. Edmisten, Shawn A. Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.56454/pqlq9690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Harvest aids provide cotton farmers with the ability to harvest in an efficient and timely manner. Harvest aids also assistant in preserving overall fiber quality by reducing fiber degradation and discoloration from exposure to weather and by the reduction of foreign matter. Many harvest-aid active ingredients do not translocate within the plant, thus adequate spray coverage is recommended to improve efficacy of these products. The widespread and rapid adoption of auxin-tolerant cotton varieties has increased the use of larger droplet size nozzles that are required for use with auxin herbicides. Subsequently, the use of larger droplet size nozzles for harvest-aid applications will likely increase. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of droplet size and carrier volume on defoliation, desiccation, boll opening, terminal and basal regrowth, and cotton leaf grade. Varying water volumes of 47, 93, 140, and 187 L ha-1, and nozzles that produced fine, medium, and ultra-coarse droplets were evaluated at 14 site years across the Cotton Belt in 2016 and 2017. Numeric trends indicate higher carrier volumes are more successful at defoliating and opening bolls than lower carrier volumes. Water volumes of 47 L ha-1 should be avoided when making cotton harvest-aid applications, as all defoliation, open boll, and regrowth values were consistently reduced at the lowest carrier volume. Treatments of various nozzle types had less impact on harvest-aid efficacy than carrier volume. Site interactions with harvest aids had a greater effect than nozzle type or water volume.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cotton science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56454/pqlq9690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cotton science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56454/pqlq9690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

收获辅助设备为棉农提供了高效、及时的收获能力。收获助剂还有助于保持纤维的整体质量,因为它减少了纤维在暴露于天气下的降解和变色,减少了外来物质。许多有助于收获的活性成分不会在植物内转移,因此建议适当的喷雾覆盖以提高这些产品的功效。抗生长素棉花品种的广泛和迅速采用,增加了使用更大液滴大小的喷嘴,这需要与生长素除草剂一起使用。随后,在辅助收获应用中使用更大液滴尺寸的喷嘴可能会增加。研究了液滴大小和载体体积对棉花落叶、干燥、开铃、顶端和基部再生以及叶片等级的影响。在2016年和2017年的14个站点年里,对棉花带47、93、140和187 L ha-1的不同水量以及产生细、中、超粗水滴的喷嘴进行了评估。数值趋势表明,较高的载体体积比较低的载体体积在脱叶和开铃方面更成功。在进行棉花助收施用时应避免47 L ha-1的水量,因为在最低载体体积下,所有的落叶、开铃和再生值都持续降低。不同喷嘴类型处理对助收效果的影响小于载体体积。现场与收获辅助的相互作用比喷嘴类型或水量的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Water Volume and Deposition Effects on Harvest-Aid Efficacy
Harvest aids provide cotton farmers with the ability to harvest in an efficient and timely manner. Harvest aids also assistant in preserving overall fiber quality by reducing fiber degradation and discoloration from exposure to weather and by the reduction of foreign matter. Many harvest-aid active ingredients do not translocate within the plant, thus adequate spray coverage is recommended to improve efficacy of these products. The widespread and rapid adoption of auxin-tolerant cotton varieties has increased the use of larger droplet size nozzles that are required for use with auxin herbicides. Subsequently, the use of larger droplet size nozzles for harvest-aid applications will likely increase. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of droplet size and carrier volume on defoliation, desiccation, boll opening, terminal and basal regrowth, and cotton leaf grade. Varying water volumes of 47, 93, 140, and 187 L ha-1, and nozzles that produced fine, medium, and ultra-coarse droplets were evaluated at 14 site years across the Cotton Belt in 2016 and 2017. Numeric trends indicate higher carrier volumes are more successful at defoliating and opening bolls than lower carrier volumes. Water volumes of 47 L ha-1 should be avoided when making cotton harvest-aid applications, as all defoliation, open boll, and regrowth values were consistently reduced at the lowest carrier volume. Treatments of various nozzle types had less impact on harvest-aid efficacy than carrier volume. Site interactions with harvest aids had a greater effect than nozzle type or water volume.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cotton science
Journal of cotton science AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The multidisciplinary, refereed journal contains articles that improve our understanding of cotton science. Publications may be compilations of original research, syntheses, reviews, or notes on original research or new techniques or equipment.
期刊最新文献
Utility of Hooded Broadcast Sprayer in Reducing Herbicide Particle Drift in Cotton Effects of Potassium Rates and Timing on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality Seed Hull Fracture Resistance of Upland and Pima Cotton Cultivars Cotton Seed Size – What is the “Fuzz” all About? Evaluation of Practices to Unwrap Round Cotton Modules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1