中国司法系统人力资源管理的工作分析与未来改革:中美两国职位制度视角下的比较研究

Yongqiang Tu, Ruijundi Ma, Jingyi Gong
{"title":"中国司法系统人力资源管理的工作分析与未来改革:中美两国职位制度视角下的比较研究","authors":"Yongqiang Tu, Ruijundi Ma, Jingyi Gong","doi":"10.47297/WSPCHRMWSP2040-800503.20201101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose-In the context of the current judicial responsibility system in China, under the background of the basic formation of the human resources classification management pattern and the establishment and operation of the new judicial power operation mechanism, how to carry out scientific and reasonable human resources classification, work analysis and systematic reconstruction of judicial human resources is a major problem that must be faced and optimized while directly promoting the reform of the post system, which is also the main purpose of this paper. Design/methodology/approach-On the basis of summarizing the characteristics of judicial system in China and the United States, this paper will draw lessons from the methods and mechanisms of judicial human resource management(HRM)system in the United States, and further provide research suggestions for the implementation of judicial post system reform in China. Findings-This paper summarizes the characteristics of the work analysis in judicial system in China and the United States, and finds out the problems and reasons for China’s current judicial system work analysis and post system design via multiple related comparisons. Research implications-As the most important and difficult part of judicial reform, the post system reform is of great significance to promote the specialization and elitism of judges, improve the quality of case handling, and promote the fairness and justice of each case. Based on the summary of judicial human resource methods and the comparative study on the practice of China and the United States, this paper may be helpful to provide further suggestions for the reform of the post system in China’s judicial system. Originality/value-This paper summarizes the methods of human resource management in judicial system, especially workload estimation, and focuses on the weighted case volume model of the United States. By comparing the case studies of post system design between China and the United States, this paper provides a scientific method for China’s post system reform in the future.","PeriodicalId":54013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"34-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work analysis and the future reform of HRM for China’s judicial system: a comparative study from the perspective of post system between China and the US\",\"authors\":\"Yongqiang Tu, Ruijundi Ma, Jingyi Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.47297/WSPCHRMWSP2040-800503.20201101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose-In the context of the current judicial responsibility system in China, under the background of the basic formation of the human resources classification management pattern and the establishment and operation of the new judicial power operation mechanism, how to carry out scientific and reasonable human resources classification, work analysis and systematic reconstruction of judicial human resources is a major problem that must be faced and optimized while directly promoting the reform of the post system, which is also the main purpose of this paper. Design/methodology/approach-On the basis of summarizing the characteristics of judicial system in China and the United States, this paper will draw lessons from the methods and mechanisms of judicial human resource management(HRM)system in the United States, and further provide research suggestions for the implementation of judicial post system reform in China. Findings-This paper summarizes the characteristics of the work analysis in judicial system in China and the United States, and finds out the problems and reasons for China’s current judicial system work analysis and post system design via multiple related comparisons. Research implications-As the most important and difficult part of judicial reform, the post system reform is of great significance to promote the specialization and elitism of judges, improve the quality of case handling, and promote the fairness and justice of each case. Based on the summary of judicial human resource methods and the comparative study on the practice of China and the United States, this paper may be helpful to provide further suggestions for the reform of the post system in China’s judicial system. Originality/value-This paper summarizes the methods of human resource management in judicial system, especially workload estimation, and focuses on the weighted case volume model of the United States. By comparing the case studies of post system design between China and the United States, this paper provides a scientific method for China’s post system reform in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"34-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPCHRMWSP2040-800503.20201101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Human Resources Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPCHRMWSP2040-800503.20201101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:在中国现行司法责任制的背景下,在人力资源分类管理模式基本形成、新的司法权运行机制建立和运行的背景下,如何进行科学合理的人力资源分类,司法人力资源工作分析与系统重构是直接推进职务制度改革必须面对和优化的重大问题,也是本文研究的主要目的。设计/方法/途径在总结中美两国司法制度特点的基础上,借鉴美国司法人力资源管理(HRM)制度的方法和机制,进一步为中国实施司法岗位制度改革提供研究建议。研究结果——本文总结了中美两国司法系统工作分析的特点,并通过多项相关比较,找出中国当前司法系统工作分析和岗位制度设计存在的问题及原因。研究意义——作为司法改革中最重要也是最困难的环节,职务制度改革对于促进法官专业化和精英化,提高办案质量,促进每件案件的公平正义具有重要意义。本文在总结司法人力资源方法的基础上,对中美两国的实践进行比较研究,或许有助于为中国司法体制的职位制度改革提供进一步的建议。本文总结了司法系统人力资源管理的方法,特别是工作量估算方法,并重点介绍了美国的加权案例量模型。本文通过对比中美两国邮政制度设计的案例研究,为中国未来的邮政制度改革提供科学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Work analysis and the future reform of HRM for China’s judicial system: a comparative study from the perspective of post system between China and the US
Purpose-In the context of the current judicial responsibility system in China, under the background of the basic formation of the human resources classification management pattern and the establishment and operation of the new judicial power operation mechanism, how to carry out scientific and reasonable human resources classification, work analysis and systematic reconstruction of judicial human resources is a major problem that must be faced and optimized while directly promoting the reform of the post system, which is also the main purpose of this paper. Design/methodology/approach-On the basis of summarizing the characteristics of judicial system in China and the United States, this paper will draw lessons from the methods and mechanisms of judicial human resource management(HRM)system in the United States, and further provide research suggestions for the implementation of judicial post system reform in China. Findings-This paper summarizes the characteristics of the work analysis in judicial system in China and the United States, and finds out the problems and reasons for China’s current judicial system work analysis and post system design via multiple related comparisons. Research implications-As the most important and difficult part of judicial reform, the post system reform is of great significance to promote the specialization and elitism of judges, improve the quality of case handling, and promote the fairness and justice of each case. Based on the summary of judicial human resource methods and the comparative study on the practice of China and the United States, this paper may be helpful to provide further suggestions for the reform of the post system in China’s judicial system. Originality/value-This paper summarizes the methods of human resource management in judicial system, especially workload estimation, and focuses on the weighted case volume model of the United States. By comparing the case studies of post system design between China and the United States, this paper provides a scientific method for China’s post system reform in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Success Factors for Job Seekers among Chinese University Graduates Based on Social Career Cognitive Theory Global Research on Ethical Leadership: A Bibliometric Investigation and Knowledge Mapping How Transformational Leadership Affects Firm Innovation Performance - A Perspective Based on Environmental Dynamism and Business Model Innovation The Impact of Paternalistic Leadership Styles on Employee Engagement in the Pharmaceutical Distribution Industry: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital Research on Criminal Laws and the Regulations of Labor Conflicts in P.R. China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1