伊朗北部鼻中隔成形术与非鼻塞的比较研究

A. Habibi, S. Nemati, P. Alizadeh, Siavash Razaghi
{"title":"伊朗北部鼻中隔成形术与非鼻塞的比较研究","authors":"A. Habibi, S. Nemati, P. Alizadeh, Siavash Razaghi","doi":"10.5455/JRMDS.2018633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Septorhinoplasty are the most common nose surgical procedures widely used the world over. The main aim of this study was comparing the results of septorhinoplasty with and without nasal packing. This case control interventional study was conducted on patients who underwent septorhinoplasty in an ENT university hospital in north of Iran. Two separate groups, with or without nasal tampon (each group consisted of 35 patients) were includedin the study. Open surgical approach for repairment was executed for all and nasal packing (ie. tetracycline impregnated mesh, that was removed after 48 hours) for 35 patients inserted postoperatively.Patients were studied in three time periodsfor pain (using Visual Analogue Scale) and other postoperative signs and symptoms and convenience and overall satisfaction. No significant difference for postoperative bleeding, ecchymosis, hematoma and rhinorrhea was founded between the groups (pEƒ0.05), but there was a significant difference in short-term outcomes in terms of convenience (p=0.006), edema two days after surgery (p= 0.001), right side and left side edema (p=0.002). The overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients without nasal packing (p= 0.002). In assessment of the pain rate one week after surgery, there was no significant difference in various age and sex groups (pEƒ0.05). Based on our 8indings routine nasal packing is not working well in septo-rhinoplasty cases and it is recommended to be avoided in these patients.","PeriodicalId":17001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Septorhinoplasty with and without Nasal Packing:A Comparative Study from North of Iran\",\"authors\":\"A. Habibi, S. Nemati, P. Alizadeh, Siavash Razaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/JRMDS.2018633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Septorhinoplasty are the most common nose surgical procedures widely used the world over. The main aim of this study was comparing the results of septorhinoplasty with and without nasal packing. This case control interventional study was conducted on patients who underwent septorhinoplasty in an ENT university hospital in north of Iran. Two separate groups, with or without nasal tampon (each group consisted of 35 patients) were includedin the study. Open surgical approach for repairment was executed for all and nasal packing (ie. tetracycline impregnated mesh, that was removed after 48 hours) for 35 patients inserted postoperatively.Patients were studied in three time periodsfor pain (using Visual Analogue Scale) and other postoperative signs and symptoms and convenience and overall satisfaction. No significant difference for postoperative bleeding, ecchymosis, hematoma and rhinorrhea was founded between the groups (pEƒ0.05), but there was a significant difference in short-term outcomes in terms of convenience (p=0.006), edema two days after surgery (p= 0.001), right side and left side edema (p=0.002). The overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients without nasal packing (p= 0.002). In assessment of the pain rate one week after surgery, there was no significant difference in various age and sex groups (pEƒ0.05). Based on our 8indings routine nasal packing is not working well in septo-rhinoplasty cases and it is recommended to be avoided in these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"12-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/JRMDS.2018633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JRMDS.2018633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻中隔成形术是世界上最常用的鼻外科手术。本研究的主要目的是比较鼻中隔成形术有鼻填充物和没有鼻填充物的结果。本病例对照介入性研究是在伊朗北部的一家耳鼻喉科大学医院进行鼻中隔成形术的患者。两组分别使用或不使用鼻卫生棉条(每组35例)。所有鼻塞和鼻填塞均采用开放手术方法修复。35例患者术后插入四环素浸渍补片(48小时后取出)。在三个时间段对患者进行疼痛(使用视觉模拟量表)和其他术后体征、症状、便利性和总体满意度的研究。两组在术后出血、瘀斑、血肿、鼻漏方面差异无统计学意义(pE±0.05),但在短期疗效方面差异有统计学意义(p=0.006),术后2 d水肿(p= 0.001),左右侧水肿(p=0.002)。未进行鼻填充物处理的患者总体满意度显著高于未进行鼻填充物处理的患者(p= 0.002)。术后1周疼痛率评估,各年龄、性别组比较差异无统计学意义(pE©0.05)。根据我们的8项研究结果,常规鼻塞在鼻中隔成形术中效果不佳,建议在这些患者中避免使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Septorhinoplasty with and without Nasal Packing:A Comparative Study from North of Iran
Septorhinoplasty are the most common nose surgical procedures widely used the world over. The main aim of this study was comparing the results of septorhinoplasty with and without nasal packing. This case control interventional study was conducted on patients who underwent septorhinoplasty in an ENT university hospital in north of Iran. Two separate groups, with or without nasal tampon (each group consisted of 35 patients) were includedin the study. Open surgical approach for repairment was executed for all and nasal packing (ie. tetracycline impregnated mesh, that was removed after 48 hours) for 35 patients inserted postoperatively.Patients were studied in three time periodsfor pain (using Visual Analogue Scale) and other postoperative signs and symptoms and convenience and overall satisfaction. No significant difference for postoperative bleeding, ecchymosis, hematoma and rhinorrhea was founded between the groups (pEƒ0.05), but there was a significant difference in short-term outcomes in terms of convenience (p=0.006), edema two days after surgery (p= 0.001), right side and left side edema (p=0.002). The overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients without nasal packing (p= 0.002). In assessment of the pain rate one week after surgery, there was no significant difference in various age and sex groups (pEƒ0.05). Based on our 8indings routine nasal packing is not working well in septo-rhinoplasty cases and it is recommended to be avoided in these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simulation-Based Training in Basic Surgical Skills: Experiences from A Repeat Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia Referral Patterns of Paediatricians and General Medical Practitioners to Paediatric Dental Clinics and Oral Health Knowledge in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey The Effect of Dairy Products Intake on Dental Caries across Adolescent Females in Al Thahab Al Abyedh Village Baghdad The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction in selected colleges at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia The Relationship between Spiritual Well-being and Family Cohesion in Patients with Thalassemia Major
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1