政治优势影响经济不平等吗?

Q2 Decision Sciences Advances in Decision Sciences Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.47654/v24y2020i1p121-149
H. Ryu, D. Slottje
{"title":"政治优势影响经济不平等吗?","authors":"H. Ryu, D. Slottje","doi":"10.47654/v24y2020i1p121-149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the relationship between political dominance and economic inequality in the U.S. for the years 1947-2017. Conventional wisdom suggests that when Democrats control Congress and the Presidency, they will pursue policy goals that are inequality reducing through government actions. Republican controlled Congresses and presidencies are presumed to pursue economic growth and limited government intervention policies. However, are these beliefs true? Economic inequality is a broad term with various interpretations. In this paper we adopt a different approach. We consider the distribution of utility that individuals possess, while understanding that of course this depends in part on their income levels. We do find that Democratic presidential administrations correlate with lowering economic inequality and when Republican presidents hold the White House this correlates with increasing levels of economic inequality. However, we find that dominance by a given party in Congress has a negligible impact.","PeriodicalId":38875,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Decision Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"121-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Political Dominance Impact Economic Inequality?\",\"authors\":\"H. Ryu, D. Slottje\",\"doi\":\"10.47654/v24y2020i1p121-149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the relationship between political dominance and economic inequality in the U.S. for the years 1947-2017. Conventional wisdom suggests that when Democrats control Congress and the Presidency, they will pursue policy goals that are inequality reducing through government actions. Republican controlled Congresses and presidencies are presumed to pursue economic growth and limited government intervention policies. However, are these beliefs true? Economic inequality is a broad term with various interpretations. In this paper we adopt a different approach. We consider the distribution of utility that individuals possess, while understanding that of course this depends in part on their income levels. We do find that Democratic presidential administrations correlate with lowering economic inequality and when Republican presidents hold the White House this correlates with increasing levels of economic inequality. However, we find that dominance by a given party in Congress has a negligible impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Decision Sciences\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"121-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Decision Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47654/v24y2020i1p121-149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Decision Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47654/v24y2020i1p121-149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了1947年至2017年美国政治主导地位与经济不平等之间的关系。传统观点认为,当民主党控制国会和总统职位时,他们将追求通过政府行动减少不平等的政策目标。共和党控制的国会和总统被认为会追求经济增长和有限的政府干预政策。然而,这些信念是真的吗?经济不平等是一个有着多种解释的广义术语。在本文中,我们采用了一种不同的方法。我们考虑个人拥有的效用分配,同时理解这当然部分取决于他们的收入水平。我们确实发现,民主党总统执政与经济不平等程度的降低有关,而共和党总统执政与经济不平等程度的增加有关。然而,我们发现某一政党在国会的主导地位的影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Political Dominance Impact Economic Inequality?
This paper examines the relationship between political dominance and economic inequality in the U.S. for the years 1947-2017. Conventional wisdom suggests that when Democrats control Congress and the Presidency, they will pursue policy goals that are inequality reducing through government actions. Republican controlled Congresses and presidencies are presumed to pursue economic growth and limited government intervention policies. However, are these beliefs true? Economic inequality is a broad term with various interpretations. In this paper we adopt a different approach. We consider the distribution of utility that individuals possess, while understanding that of course this depends in part on their income levels. We do find that Democratic presidential administrations correlate with lowering economic inequality and when Republican presidents hold the White House this correlates with increasing levels of economic inequality. However, we find that dominance by a given party in Congress has a negligible impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Decision Sciences
Advances in Decision Sciences Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidence from School Principals: Academic Supervision Decision-making on Improving Teacher Performance in Indonesia Impact of Financial Liberalization on Firm Risk A Technical Indicator for a Short-term Trading Decision in the NASDAQ Market Investigating the Influence of Brand Communication and Brand Trust on Customer Commitment: An Examination from the Perspective of Customer Perception Drivers to green human resources management (GHRM) implementation: A Context of Cement Industry in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1