根据2012 - 2017年的管理模式,对选定的联邦大学医院进行探索性研究

Maria de Fátima Siliansky De Andreazzi, Leyla Sancho Gomes, M. A. Pérez, Nathalie Rodrigues Pontes Azevedo, Lara Vitória Lara da Silva D'almeida
{"title":"根据2012 - 2017年的管理模式,对选定的联邦大学医院进行探索性研究","authors":"Maria de Fátima Siliansky De Andreazzi, Leyla Sancho Gomes, M. A. Pérez, Nathalie Rodrigues Pontes Azevedo, Lara Vitória Lara da Silva D'almeida","doi":"10.5585/RGSS.V10I3.17204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from 2013, the federal University Hospitals (HUs) were induced to join the Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH). At the end of 2017, only four Federal Higher Education Institutions (IFES) had not joined this company. The article intends to identify and discuss some changes in the Hus, whether having a contract with the EBSERH or not, in order to understand and compare the role of management models related to investments and use of resources, such as beds, people, equipment and production (hospitalizations) and occupancy rates in the period from 2012 to 2017 when most contracts were established. This is an exploratory, descriptive, analytical and retrospective ecological study that uses secondary data from the official public databases of the SUS. It was found that the average variation of the set of hospitals, in both management models, was positive for complementary beds, number of workers and residents and negative for hospital beds. The growth in hospitalizations and the occupancy rate in both management models was noteworthy, with no statistical significance in the means of variation of the two models in all the variables studied. There was only a negative and significant correlation between the variation in the occupancy rate and hospital beds in all hospitals with a contract with EBSERH, showing that the growth in hospital admissions from these hospitals were explained by a greater use of a smaller number of beds and not because of an increase in the number of workers or beds.","PeriodicalId":41211,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao em Sistemas de Saude-RGSS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Um olhar exploratório sobre hospitais universitários federais selecionados segundo modelos de gestão de 2012 a 2017\",\"authors\":\"Maria de Fátima Siliansky De Andreazzi, Leyla Sancho Gomes, M. A. Pérez, Nathalie Rodrigues Pontes Azevedo, Lara Vitória Lara da Silva D'almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.5585/RGSS.V10I3.17204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting from 2013, the federal University Hospitals (HUs) were induced to join the Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH). At the end of 2017, only four Federal Higher Education Institutions (IFES) had not joined this company. The article intends to identify and discuss some changes in the Hus, whether having a contract with the EBSERH or not, in order to understand and compare the role of management models related to investments and use of resources, such as beds, people, equipment and production (hospitalizations) and occupancy rates in the period from 2012 to 2017 when most contracts were established. This is an exploratory, descriptive, analytical and retrospective ecological study that uses secondary data from the official public databases of the SUS. It was found that the average variation of the set of hospitals, in both management models, was positive for complementary beds, number of workers and residents and negative for hospital beds. The growth in hospitalizations and the occupancy rate in both management models was noteworthy, with no statistical significance in the means of variation of the two models in all the variables studied. There was only a negative and significant correlation between the variation in the occupancy rate and hospital beds in all hospitals with a contract with EBSERH, showing that the growth in hospital admissions from these hospitals were explained by a greater use of a smaller number of beds and not because of an increase in the number of workers or beds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao em Sistemas de Saude-RGSS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao em Sistemas de Saude-RGSS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5585/RGSS.V10I3.17204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao em Sistemas de Saude-RGSS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/RGSS.V10I3.17204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从2013年开始,联邦大学医院(HUs)被诱导加入巴西医院服务公司(EBSERH)。截至2017年底,只有四所联邦高等教育机构(IFES)尚未加入该公司。本文旨在识别和讨论医院的一些变化,无论是否与EBSERH签订合同,以了解和比较在大多数合同签订的2012年至2017年期间,与床位、人员、设备、生产(住院)和入住率等资源的投资和使用相关的管理模式的作用。这是一项探索性、描述性、分析性和回顾性的生态研究,使用了SUS官方公共数据库的二手数据。研究发现,在两种管理模式下,医院组的平均变化对补充床位、工人人数和居民人数均为正,对医院床位均为负。两种管理模式的住院率和入住率的增长值得注意,在所有研究变量中,两种模式的变异均值均无统计学意义。在所有与卫生和社会服务部签订合同的医院中,入住率的变化与医院床位之间仅存在显著的负相关关系,这表明这些医院住院人数的增长是由于更多人使用了更少的床位,而不是由于工人或床位数量的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Um olhar exploratório sobre hospitais universitários federais selecionados segundo modelos de gestão de 2012 a 2017
Starting from 2013, the federal University Hospitals (HUs) were induced to join the Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH). At the end of 2017, only four Federal Higher Education Institutions (IFES) had not joined this company. The article intends to identify and discuss some changes in the Hus, whether having a contract with the EBSERH or not, in order to understand and compare the role of management models related to investments and use of resources, such as beds, people, equipment and production (hospitalizations) and occupancy rates in the period from 2012 to 2017 when most contracts were established. This is an exploratory, descriptive, analytical and retrospective ecological study that uses secondary data from the official public databases of the SUS. It was found that the average variation of the set of hospitals, in both management models, was positive for complementary beds, number of workers and residents and negative for hospital beds. The growth in hospitalizations and the occupancy rate in both management models was noteworthy, with no statistical significance in the means of variation of the two models in all the variables studied. There was only a negative and significant correlation between the variation in the occupancy rate and hospital beds in all hospitals with a contract with EBSERH, showing that the growth in hospital admissions from these hospitals were explained by a greater use of a smaller number of beds and not because of an increase in the number of workers or beds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Panorama da saúde bucal na atenção básica nas macrorregiões brasileiras no período de 2009 a 2018 Austeridade em Portugal: medidas implementadas e seu impacto no acesso, eficiência e qualidade do serviço nacional de saúde Um olhar exploratório sobre hospitais universitários federais selecionados segundo modelos de gestão de 2012 a 2017 Uma proposta de instrumento de avaliação da qualidade em farmácias comunitárias utilizando um sistema de informação geográfica Análise de desempenho do SAMU de Ouro Preto e Mariana através de modelos de simulação
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1