心理治疗中的自然结果评价

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5093/anyes2021a6
José Eduardo Rodríguez Otero, R. V. Gómez, F. Rey
{"title":"心理治疗中的自然结果评价","authors":"José Eduardo Rodríguez Otero, R. V. Gómez, F. Rey","doi":"10.5093/anyes2021a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: The naturalistic outcomes assessment in psychotherapy is a requirement for the clinician to evaluate the effectiveness of his work and, in this way, correct possible deficiencies in his performance. The present study evaluated the outcomes of a psychotherapeutic intervention carried out from the solution-focused therapy of a clinical psychologist in his private practice for five years. In addition, the relationship of the outcomes with different sociodemographic, clinical and model variables was evaluated, in search of a profile that would benefit especially from the psychotherapeutic process. Material and methods: The sample was comprised of 249 people aged 11 and 78 years. A naturalistic evaluation was carried out implementing a protocol for assesing outcomes in the routine clinical work. The severity of the symptoms and the impairment of the cases were measured by the Global Assessment Functioning Scale (GAF). Sociodemographic, clinical and model variables were also evaluated. Results: 75.5% of the sample had a successful outcome in therapy. This percentage rose to 85.8% if only people who were considered to have completed psychotherapeutic treatment were taken into account. Age, life stage, symptomatic severity, and having previously been in therapeutic treatment were related, although weakly, to the results. Conclusions: These outcomes support the hypothesis of the effectiveness of psychotherapy and its strength in different sociodemographic and clinical profiles.","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de resultados naturalística en psicoterapia\",\"authors\":\"José Eduardo Rodríguez Otero, R. V. Gómez, F. Rey\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/anyes2021a6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction and objectives: The naturalistic outcomes assessment in psychotherapy is a requirement for the clinician to evaluate the effectiveness of his work and, in this way, correct possible deficiencies in his performance. The present study evaluated the outcomes of a psychotherapeutic intervention carried out from the solution-focused therapy of a clinical psychologist in his private practice for five years. In addition, the relationship of the outcomes with different sociodemographic, clinical and model variables was evaluated, in search of a profile that would benefit especially from the psychotherapeutic process. Material and methods: The sample was comprised of 249 people aged 11 and 78 years. A naturalistic evaluation was carried out implementing a protocol for assesing outcomes in the routine clinical work. The severity of the symptoms and the impairment of the cases were measured by the Global Assessment Functioning Scale (GAF). Sociodemographic, clinical and model variables were also evaluated. Results: 75.5% of the sample had a successful outcome in therapy. This percentage rose to 85.8% if only people who were considered to have completed psychotherapeutic treatment were taken into account. Age, life stage, symptomatic severity, and having previously been in therapeutic treatment were related, although weakly, to the results. Conclusions: These outcomes support the hypothesis of the effectiveness of psychotherapy and its strength in different sociodemographic and clinical profiles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/anyes2021a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言和目的:心理治疗中的自然结果评估是临床医生评估其工作有效性的要求,并以此方式纠正其工作中可能存在的缺陷。本研究评估了一项心理治疗干预的结果,该干预是从一位临床心理学家在他的私人执业中进行的为期五年的以解决方案为中心的治疗。此外,还评估了结果与不同社会人口学、临床和模型变量之间的关系,以寻找特别受益于心理治疗过程的概况。材料与方法:样本由249人组成,年龄在11岁到78岁之间。在常规临床工作中实施评估结果的方案进行了自然评估。症状的严重程度和病例的损害程度由全球评估功能量表(GAF)衡量。还评估了社会人口学、临床和模型变量。结果:75.5%的患者治疗成功。如果只考虑那些被认为已经完成心理治疗的人,这一比例上升到85.8%。年龄、生命阶段、症状严重程度和之前接受过治疗与结果相关,但相关性较弱。结论:这些结果支持心理治疗有效性的假设,以及它在不同社会人口学和临床概况中的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluación de resultados naturalística en psicoterapia
Introduction and objectives: The naturalistic outcomes assessment in psychotherapy is a requirement for the clinician to evaluate the effectiveness of his work and, in this way, correct possible deficiencies in his performance. The present study evaluated the outcomes of a psychotherapeutic intervention carried out from the solution-focused therapy of a clinical psychologist in his private practice for five years. In addition, the relationship of the outcomes with different sociodemographic, clinical and model variables was evaluated, in search of a profile that would benefit especially from the psychotherapeutic process. Material and methods: The sample was comprised of 249 people aged 11 and 78 years. A naturalistic evaluation was carried out implementing a protocol for assesing outcomes in the routine clinical work. The severity of the symptoms and the impairment of the cases were measured by the Global Assessment Functioning Scale (GAF). Sociodemographic, clinical and model variables were also evaluated. Results: 75.5% of the sample had a successful outcome in therapy. This percentage rose to 85.8% if only people who were considered to have completed psychotherapeutic treatment were taken into account. Age, life stage, symptomatic severity, and having previously been in therapeutic treatment were related, although weakly, to the results. Conclusions: These outcomes support the hypothesis of the effectiveness of psychotherapy and its strength in different sociodemographic and clinical profiles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Factor structure and reliability of the Lasher and Faulkender’s Anxiety about Aging Scale in Mexican adults Ansiedad precompetitiva y habilidades psicológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento deportivo How to evaluate coping strategies for stressful situations? Validation of the CSI in a Spanish university population Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Social para Adultos (CASO) en población Dominicana Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1