斯洛文尼亚公共交通可达性的空间分析

IF 0.6 Q4 URBAN STUDIES Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-01-04
Jernej Tiran, Nika Razpotnik Visković, Matej Gabrovec, Simon Koblar
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚公共交通可达性的空间分析","authors":"Jernej Tiran, Nika Razpotnik Visković, Matej Gabrovec, Simon Koblar","doi":"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-01-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the accessibility of public transport in Slovenia in terms of the proximity of stops and trip frequency. By combining the Central Population Register with data on the provision of public transport services, geographic information systems were used to calculate the share of the population living within a 500 and 1,000 m radius from stops with a basic number of daily trips. The spatial differences in accessibility were analysed, and the population density data were utilized to identify the main gaps in provision. Moreover, the location of newer settlements was analysed in terms of their integration into the existing public transport network. It was determined that public transport accessibility in the country is relatively adequate within a 1,000 m radius; however, within a 500 m radius, it is adequate only in most urban areas. There are extensive areas without adequate accessibility, which is a consequence of low population density particularly in the countryside, whereas larger gaps in provision appear in suburban areas that have grown outside public transport corridors. The 2004–2020 study period revealed a trend of lower demographic growth than the Slovenian average in areas with the best public transport accessibility, whereas the areas of the greatest population growth and most intense residential construction have been only partly located in the vicinity of the public transport network. This confirms the hypothesis that current strategic spatial planning documents are not followed consistently, and that transport and spatial planning are insufficiently integrated.","PeriodicalId":54093,"journal":{"name":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A spatial analysis of public transport accessibility\\nin Slovenia\",\"authors\":\"Jernej Tiran, Nika Razpotnik Visković, Matej Gabrovec, Simon Koblar\",\"doi\":\"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-01-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the accessibility of public transport in Slovenia in terms of the proximity of stops and trip frequency. By combining the Central Population Register with data on the provision of public transport services, geographic information systems were used to calculate the share of the population living within a 500 and 1,000 m radius from stops with a basic number of daily trips. The spatial differences in accessibility were analysed, and the population density data were utilized to identify the main gaps in provision. Moreover, the location of newer settlements was analysed in terms of their integration into the existing public transport network. It was determined that public transport accessibility in the country is relatively adequate within a 1,000 m radius; however, within a 500 m radius, it is adequate only in most urban areas. There are extensive areas without adequate accessibility, which is a consequence of low population density particularly in the countryside, whereas larger gaps in provision appear in suburban areas that have grown outside public transport corridors. The 2004–2020 study period revealed a trend of lower demographic growth than the Slovenian average in areas with the best public transport accessibility, whereas the areas of the greatest population growth and most intense residential construction have been only partly located in the vicinity of the public transport network. This confirms the hypothesis that current strategic spatial planning documents are not followed consistently, and that transport and spatial planning are insufficiently integrated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-01-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2022-33-01-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章分析了斯洛文尼亚公共交通的可达性在接近的停止和行程频率方面。地理资讯系统结合中央人口登记册和提供公共交通服务的数据,计算居住在每日基本行车次数的车站半径500米和1,000米范围内的人口比例。分析了可达性的空间差异,并利用人口密度数据确定了供应方面的主要差距。此外,还分析了新住区的位置是否与现有公共交通网络相结合。据确定,该国在1000米半径范围内的公共交通可达性相对充足;然而,在500米半径范围内,它只适用于大多数城市地区。由于人口密度低,特别是农村地区的人口密度低,有许多地区没有足够的交通便利,而在公共交通走廊以外的郊区,供应方面出现了较大的差距。2004-2020年的研究表明,在公共交通可达性最好的地区,人口增长趋势低于斯洛文尼亚的平均水平,而人口增长最快和住宅建设最密集的地区仅部分位于公共交通网络附近。这证实了一种假设,即目前的战略空间规划文件没有得到一致的遵守,交通和空间规划没有充分地结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A spatial analysis of public transport accessibility in Slovenia
This article analyses the accessibility of public transport in Slovenia in terms of the proximity of stops and trip frequency. By combining the Central Population Register with data on the provision of public transport services, geographic information systems were used to calculate the share of the population living within a 500 and 1,000 m radius from stops with a basic number of daily trips. The spatial differences in accessibility were analysed, and the population density data were utilized to identify the main gaps in provision. Moreover, the location of newer settlements was analysed in terms of their integration into the existing public transport network. It was determined that public transport accessibility in the country is relatively adequate within a 1,000 m radius; however, within a 500 m radius, it is adequate only in most urban areas. There are extensive areas without adequate accessibility, which is a consequence of low population density particularly in the countryside, whereas larger gaps in provision appear in suburban areas that have grown outside public transport corridors. The 2004–2020 study period revealed a trend of lower demographic growth than the Slovenian average in areas with the best public transport accessibility, whereas the areas of the greatest population growth and most intense residential construction have been only partly located in the vicinity of the public transport network. This confirms the hypothesis that current strategic spatial planning documents are not followed consistently, and that transport and spatial planning are insufficiently integrated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Soobstoj oblikovanja, regulativnega okvira in pogajanj na področju urbanističnega načrtovanja: primer Buenos Airesa, Ciudada de Méxica, in São Paula Združitev odzivov na podnebne spremembe in tematskih področij starosti prijaznih mest: teoretični pregled Razvijajoči se konstrukti množičnega turizma in kapitalistično izkoriščanje obale: od trajnostne gostote in urbane morfologije do ikoničnega megaobjekta Izvirnost ukrajinske narodne arhitekture v Poltavi na začetku 20. stoletja Urbana ekonomija na globalnem jugu: raziskava člankov, objavljenih v reviji The Economist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1