处理大窝仔猪的可能性

IF 0.7 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Central European Agriculture Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5513/jcea01/24.1.3867
Ivan Řezáč, N. Kernerová, M. Komosný, Radim Kuneš, Nikola Havrdová, A. Poborská, Denisa Polívková, M. Kantor, L. Zábranský
{"title":"处理大窝仔猪的可能性","authors":"Ivan Řezáč, N. Kernerová, M. Komosný, Radim Kuneš, Nikola Havrdová, A. Poborská, Denisa Polívková, M. Kantor, L. Zábranský","doi":"10.5513/jcea01/24.1.3867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the first experiment was to verify the effectiveness and profitability of providing supplemental feed to piglets. The milk feed mixture of two producers (MFM-1 vs MFM-2) were evaluated (served ad libitum ). All piglets were suckled and were fed with the pre-starter feed mixture from the 5th day until the weaning stage. The control group without milk supplements has shown a higher piglet mortality and worse body condition of sows. The usage of milk supplements led to the elimination of the sow body condition loss during the suckling period and reduced feed mixture consumption in sows ( P <0.05). The MFM-1 group was found to have a higher consumption of milk supplements, the lowest mortality and the lowest loss of sow body condition ( P <0.05). However, from the economic point of view, i.e. the costs on 1 weaned pig, slightly better results have been proven at the MFM-2 milk supplement. In the second experiment sows were divided into 2 groups. In the first group, the piglets were fed with milk substitute and in the second group, nurse sows (15% of the herd) were used. Nurse sows had a longer suckling period and farrowing interval, a slightly lower number of litters per sow per year and by 0.93 lower number weaning piglets per year. Using the milk substitute, generated a higher business profit per year than for nurse sows. However, the fact that nurse sows block the farrowing pen should be taken into account. In case that fewer sows were kept, business profit would be higher.","PeriodicalId":51685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central European Agriculture","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibilities for dealing with large litters of piglets\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Řezáč, N. Kernerová, M. Komosný, Radim Kuneš, Nikola Havrdová, A. Poborská, Denisa Polívková, M. Kantor, L. Zábranský\",\"doi\":\"10.5513/jcea01/24.1.3867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the first experiment was to verify the effectiveness and profitability of providing supplemental feed to piglets. The milk feed mixture of two producers (MFM-1 vs MFM-2) were evaluated (served ad libitum ). All piglets were suckled and were fed with the pre-starter feed mixture from the 5th day until the weaning stage. The control group without milk supplements has shown a higher piglet mortality and worse body condition of sows. The usage of milk supplements led to the elimination of the sow body condition loss during the suckling period and reduced feed mixture consumption in sows ( P <0.05). The MFM-1 group was found to have a higher consumption of milk supplements, the lowest mortality and the lowest loss of sow body condition ( P <0.05). However, from the economic point of view, i.e. the costs on 1 weaned pig, slightly better results have been proven at the MFM-2 milk supplement. In the second experiment sows were divided into 2 groups. In the first group, the piglets were fed with milk substitute and in the second group, nurse sows (15% of the herd) were used. Nurse sows had a longer suckling period and farrowing interval, a slightly lower number of litters per sow per year and by 0.93 lower number weaning piglets per year. Using the milk substitute, generated a higher business profit per year than for nurse sows. However, the fact that nurse sows block the farrowing pen should be taken into account. In case that fewer sows were kept, business profit would be higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central European Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central European Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea01/24.1.3867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central European Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5513/jcea01/24.1.3867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一个试验的目的是验证向仔猪提供补充饲料的有效性和盈利能力。对两个生产者(MFM-1和MFM-2)的乳饲料混合物进行了评价(随意供应)。所有仔猪从第5天开始哺乳,饲喂预发酵剂混合饲料至断奶期。不添加牛奶的对照组仔猪死亡率更高,母猪身体状况更差。添加乳剂消除了哺乳期母猪体况损失,降低了母猪混合料消耗(P <0.05)。MFM-1组饲粮添加量较高,仔猪死亡率最低,母猪体况损失最低(P <0.05)。然而,从经济角度来看,即1头断奶猪的成本,已证明MFM-2补乳效果略好。试验2将母猪分为2组。第一组用代乳喂养,第二组用乳母(占母猪群的15%)喂养。哺乳母猪的哺乳期和产仔间隔较长,每头母猪每年产仔数略低,断奶仔猪数每年减少0.93头。使用牛奶替代品,每年产生的商业利润高于哺乳母猪。然而,应该考虑到护士母猪堵塞产房的事实。母猪存栏量越少,企业利润越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Possibilities for dealing with large litters of piglets
The aim of the first experiment was to verify the effectiveness and profitability of providing supplemental feed to piglets. The milk feed mixture of two producers (MFM-1 vs MFM-2) were evaluated (served ad libitum ). All piglets were suckled and were fed with the pre-starter feed mixture from the 5th day until the weaning stage. The control group without milk supplements has shown a higher piglet mortality and worse body condition of sows. The usage of milk supplements led to the elimination of the sow body condition loss during the suckling period and reduced feed mixture consumption in sows ( P <0.05). The MFM-1 group was found to have a higher consumption of milk supplements, the lowest mortality and the lowest loss of sow body condition ( P <0.05). However, from the economic point of view, i.e. the costs on 1 weaned pig, slightly better results have been proven at the MFM-2 milk supplement. In the second experiment sows were divided into 2 groups. In the first group, the piglets were fed with milk substitute and in the second group, nurse sows (15% of the herd) were used. Nurse sows had a longer suckling period and farrowing interval, a slightly lower number of litters per sow per year and by 0.93 lower number weaning piglets per year. Using the milk substitute, generated a higher business profit per year than for nurse sows. However, the fact that nurse sows block the farrowing pen should be taken into account. In case that fewer sows were kept, business profit would be higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Central European Agriculture
Journal of Central European Agriculture AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: - General agriculture - Animal science - Plant science - Environment in relation to agricultural production, land use and wildlife management - Agricultural economics and rural development
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of anti-transpiration on yield and quality of sugar beet subjected to water stress The effect of laccase enzyme addition to soft Syrian wheat flour or blending with durum flour on the rheological properties of dough Metabolism and utilisation of non-protein nitrogen compounds in ruminants: a review Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) gas exchange capacity under nutrient deficiency Association study between g.16024A>G polymorphism of the FASN gene and milk production of Holstein cattle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1