中国“和平发展”话语的中西解读:以规则为导向的建构主义视角

Jing Jing
{"title":"中国“和平发展”话语的中西解读:以规则为导向的建构主义视角","authors":"Jing Jing","doi":"10.5278/OJS.JCIR.V2I1.607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a rule-oriented constructivist perspective on understanding the distinct Chinese and western interpretations of China's \"peaceful development\" discourse framework. It takes the correlations of discourse, rules and rule initiated by Nicolas Onuf as an analytical tool to identify the discrepancies between and within the Chinese and western patterns of discourse, rules and rule on this issue. Critical analyses of Chinese and western discourse are provided as a source for understanding the lack of trust between China and the West on China's \"peaceful development\". This methodology, which synthesizes the rule-oriented constructivist perspective and concrete discourse analysis, is an innovated attempt to implement the conventional positivist perspective on this issue.","PeriodicalId":37130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of China and International Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese and Western Interpretations of China's \\\"Peaceful Development\\\" Discourse: A Rule-Oriented Constructivist Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jing Jing\",\"doi\":\"10.5278/OJS.JCIR.V2I1.607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper offers a rule-oriented constructivist perspective on understanding the distinct Chinese and western interpretations of China's \\\"peaceful development\\\" discourse framework. It takes the correlations of discourse, rules and rule initiated by Nicolas Onuf as an analytical tool to identify the discrepancies between and within the Chinese and western patterns of discourse, rules and rule on this issue. Critical analyses of Chinese and western discourse are provided as a source for understanding the lack of trust between China and the West on China's \\\"peaceful development\\\". This methodology, which synthesizes the rule-oriented constructivist perspective and concrete discourse analysis, is an innovated attempt to implement the conventional positivist perspective on this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of China and International Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of China and International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.JCIR.V2I1.607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of China and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5278/OJS.JCIR.V2I1.607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以规则为导向的建构主义视角来理解中西方对中国“和平发展”话语框架的不同解读。本文以尼古拉斯·奥努夫(Nicolas Onuf)提出的话语、规则和规则的相关性作为分析工具,找出中西方话语、规则和规则模式在这一问题上的差异和内在差异。通过对中西方话语的批判性分析,我们可以理解中西方对中国“和平发展”缺乏信任的原因。该方法论综合了规则导向的建构主义视角和具体话语分析,是对传统实证主义视角在这一问题上的创新尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chinese and Western Interpretations of China's "Peaceful Development" Discourse: A Rule-Oriented Constructivist Perspective
This paper offers a rule-oriented constructivist perspective on understanding the distinct Chinese and western interpretations of China's "peaceful development" discourse framework. It takes the correlations of discourse, rules and rule initiated by Nicolas Onuf as an analytical tool to identify the discrepancies between and within the Chinese and western patterns of discourse, rules and rule on this issue. Critical analyses of Chinese and western discourse are provided as a source for understanding the lack of trust between China and the West on China's "peaceful development". This methodology, which synthesizes the rule-oriented constructivist perspective and concrete discourse analysis, is an innovated attempt to implement the conventional positivist perspective on this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of China and International Relations
Journal of China and International Relations Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
New Perspectives on the BRICS Countries Belt and Road Initiative and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Geopolitical Challenges. Brazil and China Interests in Atlantic Africa: Convergences, Divergences and Opportunities for Cooperation Inside the BRICS Forum Framework Russia, BRICS and Cyber Power: International Relations Theory and the BRICS Phenomenon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1