伊朗近十年初级卫生保健中糖尿病与非糖尿病老年人认知状况的比较

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/afmnai39-34820
V. Borhaninejad, M. Saber
{"title":"伊朗近十年初级卫生保健中糖尿病与非糖尿病老年人认知状况的比较","authors":"V. Borhaninejad, M. Saber","doi":"10.5937/afmnai39-34820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Cognitive disorders and chronic diseases such as diabetes are common problems of aging. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the cognitive status of diabetic and non-diabetic elderly in the past ten years in primary health care in Iran. Method: This cross-sectional study was performed on people aged 60 years and older in Kerman, Iran in 2020. In total, this study was performed on 200 patients (100 diabetic and 100 non-diabetic) meeting inclusion criteria. The Short Mental Status Questionnaire (MMSE) and The Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) were used to assess cognitive function. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were confirmed in this study. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, T-test, and ANOVA analysis in SPSS 21 software. Results. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between diabetic and non-diabetic groups in the current cognitive status and cognitive status in the last ten years. The mean scores of cognitive function from the short mental status questionnaire in the diabetic group were lower than in the non-diabetic group (p = 0.001). The mean scores of the cognitive deficit screening questionnaire in diabetic elderly were higher than in non-diabetic elderly (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, health care providers and family physicians should focus on controlling diabetes and identifying any cognitive impairment in the early stages of comprehensive care of diabetic patients.","PeriodicalId":7132,"journal":{"name":"Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cognitive status of diabetic and non-diabetic elderly in the last ten years in primary health care in Iran\",\"authors\":\"V. Borhaninejad, M. Saber\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/afmnai39-34820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Cognitive disorders and chronic diseases such as diabetes are common problems of aging. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the cognitive status of diabetic and non-diabetic elderly in the past ten years in primary health care in Iran. Method: This cross-sectional study was performed on people aged 60 years and older in Kerman, Iran in 2020. In total, this study was performed on 200 patients (100 diabetic and 100 non-diabetic) meeting inclusion criteria. The Short Mental Status Questionnaire (MMSE) and The Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) were used to assess cognitive function. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were confirmed in this study. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, T-test, and ANOVA analysis in SPSS 21 software. Results. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between diabetic and non-diabetic groups in the current cognitive status and cognitive status in the last ten years. The mean scores of cognitive function from the short mental status questionnaire in the diabetic group were lower than in the non-diabetic group (p = 0.001). The mean scores of the cognitive deficit screening questionnaire in diabetic elderly were higher than in non-diabetic elderly (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, health care providers and family physicians should focus on controlling diabetes and identifying any cognitive impairment in the early stages of comprehensive care of diabetic patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/afmnai39-34820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/afmnai39-34820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。认知障碍和糖尿病等慢性疾病是衰老的常见问题。本研究的目的是确定和比较过去十年伊朗初级卫生保健中糖尿病和非糖尿病老年人的认知状况。方法:本横断面研究于2020年在伊朗克尔曼对60岁及以上的老年人进行。本研究共纳入200例符合纳入标准的患者(100例糖尿病患者和100例非糖尿病患者)。采用短精神状态问卷(MMSE)和老年人认知能力下降提示问卷(IQCODE)对老年人的认知功能进行评估。本研究对问卷的效度和信度进行了验证。数据在SPSS 21软件中采用卡方检验、t检验和方差分析。结果。结果显示,糖尿病组与非糖尿病组在当前认知状况和近十年认知状况上有统计学差异。糖尿病组短心理状态问卷认知功能平均得分低于非糖尿病组(p = 0.001)。老年糖尿病患者认知缺陷筛查问卷的平均得分高于非糖尿病老年人(p < 0.001)。结论。基于本研究的结果,医疗保健提供者和家庭医生应在糖尿病患者综合护理的早期阶段注重控制糖尿病和识别任何认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of cognitive status of diabetic and non-diabetic elderly in the last ten years in primary health care in Iran
Introduction. Cognitive disorders and chronic diseases such as diabetes are common problems of aging. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the cognitive status of diabetic and non-diabetic elderly in the past ten years in primary health care in Iran. Method: This cross-sectional study was performed on people aged 60 years and older in Kerman, Iran in 2020. In total, this study was performed on 200 patients (100 diabetic and 100 non-diabetic) meeting inclusion criteria. The Short Mental Status Questionnaire (MMSE) and The Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) were used to assess cognitive function. The validity and reliability of the questionnaires were confirmed in this study. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, T-test, and ANOVA analysis in SPSS 21 software. Results. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between diabetic and non-diabetic groups in the current cognitive status and cognitive status in the last ten years. The mean scores of cognitive function from the short mental status questionnaire in the diabetic group were lower than in the non-diabetic group (p = 0.001). The mean scores of the cognitive deficit screening questionnaire in diabetic elderly were higher than in non-diabetic elderly (p < 0.001). Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, health care providers and family physicians should focus on controlling diabetes and identifying any cognitive impairment in the early stages of comprehensive care of diabetic patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis
Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aesthetic appearance assessment in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis A case of bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (Nora's lesion): A brief description N-[2-(5-methoxy-1h-indole-3-yl)ethyl]acetamide may correct arterial hypertension in people with sleep problems Can continuous glucose monitoring be used as a new tool for diagnosing white coat hyperglycaemia and possibly some other entities? Overview of the possibility of bone replacement for the purpose of pre-prosthetic preparation of the patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1