对法西斯主义自由主义本体认识论的质疑

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophy Today Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/philtoday20236711
Sabeen Ahmed
{"title":"对法西斯主义自由主义本体认识论的质疑","authors":"Sabeen Ahmed","doi":"10.5840/philtoday20236711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What follows is a series of provocations, loosely interconnected, centered on the ambiguous relationship between liberalism and fascism in our age of democratic decline. Together they seek to trouble the established binaries and analytic frameworks that would position liberalism and fascism as antithetical and suggest instead that both emerge from the same condition of possibility: imperial racialism. In doing so, they reflect on the discursive function of fascism in sustaining liberal democracy as a project of white supremacy.","PeriodicalId":20142,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy Today","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provocations on the Liberal Onto-Epistemology of Fascism\",\"authors\":\"Sabeen Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/philtoday20236711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What follows is a series of provocations, loosely interconnected, centered on the ambiguous relationship between liberalism and fascism in our age of democratic decline. Together they seek to trouble the established binaries and analytic frameworks that would position liberalism and fascism as antithetical and suggest instead that both emerge from the same condition of possibility: imperial racialism. In doing so, they reflect on the discursive function of fascism in sustaining liberal democracy as a project of white supremacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy Today\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday20236711\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday20236711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接下来是一系列的挑衅,松散地联系在一起,围绕着自由主义和法西斯主义在我们这个民主衰落的时代之间的模糊关系。他们共同试图对既定的二元和分析框架提出质疑,这些框架将自由主义和法西斯主义定位为对立的,并表明两者都来自相同的可能性条件:帝国种族主义。在这样做的过程中,他们反思了法西斯主义在维持自由民主作为白人至上项目方面的话语功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Provocations on the Liberal Onto-Epistemology of Fascism
What follows is a series of provocations, loosely interconnected, centered on the ambiguous relationship between liberalism and fascism in our age of democratic decline. Together they seek to trouble the established binaries and analytic frameworks that would position liberalism and fascism as antithetical and suggest instead that both emerge from the same condition of possibility: imperial racialism. In doing so, they reflect on the discursive function of fascism in sustaining liberal democracy as a project of white supremacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophy Today
Philosophy Today PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Internal Colonialism and Democracy in advance “Just the Same Fascism for Us” in advance Violence, Democracy, and Selective Recognition in advance What Is “Totalitarian” Today? in advance The Anti-Vaxxer as a Moral Equal in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1