金融市场的腐败:制度的必然性还是失常?

Ronald F. Duska
{"title":"金融市场的腐败:制度的必然性还是失常?","authors":"Ronald F. Duska","doi":"10.5840/BPEJ2004231/230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A student came to Protagoras to learn the law. Protagoras of fered the following arrangement: The student would pay Protag oras when the student had won his first case in the courts. As soon as the student agreed, Protagoras took the student to court suing for payment on the following grounds: If Protagoras as the plantiff won the case, the student would have to pay Protagoras. If Protagoras lost the case, the student would have won his first case and would owe Protagoras the money on the basis of the agreement. Either way, Protagoras should be paid. The student, being a quick read, argued the contrary. If the student won the case, he would not have to pay Protagoras by the ruling of the court. If he lost the case, he still would not have won his first case, and would not have to pay Protagoras, on the basis of the contract.2","PeriodicalId":53983,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","volume":"23 1","pages":"223-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Corruption of Financial Markets: System Inevitability or Aberration?\",\"authors\":\"Ronald F. Duska\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/BPEJ2004231/230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A student came to Protagoras to learn the law. Protagoras of fered the following arrangement: The student would pay Protag oras when the student had won his first case in the courts. As soon as the student agreed, Protagoras took the student to court suing for payment on the following grounds: If Protagoras as the plantiff won the case, the student would have to pay Protagoras. If Protagoras lost the case, the student would have won his first case and would owe Protagoras the money on the basis of the agreement. Either way, Protagoras should be paid. The student, being a quick read, argued the contrary. If the student won the case, he would not have to pay Protagoras by the ruling of the court. If he lost the case, he still would not have won his first case, and would not have to pay Protagoras, on the basis of the contract.2\",\"PeriodicalId\":53983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"223-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ2004231/230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ2004231/230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一个学生来普罗泰戈拉学习法律。普罗塔哥拉提出了以下安排:当学生在法庭上赢得第一个案子时,他将支付普罗塔哥拉斯。学生一同意,普罗塔哥拉斯就把学生告上法庭,要求赔偿,理由如下:如果普罗塔哥拉斯作为原告赢了官司,学生就必须赔偿普罗塔哥拉斯。如果普罗塔哥拉斯输了这场官司,这个学生就会赢得他的第一个官司,并根据协议欠普罗塔哥拉斯这笔钱。不管怎样,普罗泰哥拉斯都应该得到报酬。这个学生阅读速度很快,他提出了相反的观点。如果这名学生打赢了官司,他就不必按照法院的裁决向普罗泰戈拉支付费用。如果他输了这场官司,他仍然没有赢得他的第一场官司,也不必根据合同向普罗塔戈拉斯付款
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Corruption of Financial Markets: System Inevitability or Aberration?
A student came to Protagoras to learn the law. Protagoras of fered the following arrangement: The student would pay Protag oras when the student had won his first case in the courts. As soon as the student agreed, Protagoras took the student to court suing for payment on the following grounds: If Protagoras as the plantiff won the case, the student would have to pay Protagoras. If Protagoras lost the case, the student would have won his first case and would owe Protagoras the money on the basis of the agreement. Either way, Protagoras should be paid. The student, being a quick read, argued the contrary. If the student won the case, he would not have to pay Protagoras by the ruling of the court. If he lost the case, he still would not have won his first case, and would not have to pay Protagoras, on the basis of the contract.2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Autonomy and Subordination Applying Kant’s Ethics to Video Game Business Models A Necessary Ethics Definition for Conflicts of Interest Examining Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Motivators of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior Intolerable Ideologies and the Obligation to Discriminate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1