关系营销结果:提出认知映射模型

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios Pub Date : 2015-12-21 DOI:10.7819/RBGN.V17I58.2692
Inaka Barreto, Edson Crescitelli, Julio César Bastos de Figueiredo
{"title":"关系营销结果:提出认知映射模型","authors":"Inaka Barreto, Edson Crescitelli, Julio César Bastos de Figueiredo","doi":"10.7819/RBGN.V17I58.2692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objetivo – This research sought to develop a cognitive model that expresses how marketing professionals understand the relationship between the constructs that define relationship marketing (RM). It also tried to understand, using the obtained model, how objectives in this field are achieved.  Metodo – Through cognitive mapping, we traced 35 individual mental maps, highlighting how each respondent understands the interactions between RM elements. Based on the views of these individuals, we established an aggregate mental map.  Fundamentacao teorica - The topic is based on a literature review that explores the RM concept and its main elements. Based on this review, we listed eleven main constructs.  Resultados – We established an aggregate mental map that represents the RM structural model. Model analysis identified that CLV is understood as the final result of RM. We also observed that the impact of most of the RM elements on CLV is brokered by loyalty. Personalization and quality, on the other hand, proved to be process input elements, and are the ones that most strongly impact others. Finally, we highlight that elements that punish customers are much less effective than elements that benefit them.  Contribuicoes – The model was able to insert core elements of RM, but absent from most formal models: CLV and customization. The analysis allowed us to understand the interactions between the RM elements and how the end result of RM (CLV) is formed. This understanding improves knowledge on the subject and helps guide, assess and correct actions.","PeriodicalId":45001,"journal":{"name":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Marketing results: proposition of a cognitive mapping model\",\"authors\":\"Inaka Barreto, Edson Crescitelli, Julio César Bastos de Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.7819/RBGN.V17I58.2692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objetivo – This research sought to develop a cognitive model that expresses how marketing professionals understand the relationship between the constructs that define relationship marketing (RM). It also tried to understand, using the obtained model, how objectives in this field are achieved.  Metodo – Through cognitive mapping, we traced 35 individual mental maps, highlighting how each respondent understands the interactions between RM elements. Based on the views of these individuals, we established an aggregate mental map.  Fundamentacao teorica - The topic is based on a literature review that explores the RM concept and its main elements. Based on this review, we listed eleven main constructs.  Resultados – We established an aggregate mental map that represents the RM structural model. Model analysis identified that CLV is understood as the final result of RM. We also observed that the impact of most of the RM elements on CLV is brokered by loyalty. Personalization and quality, on the other hand, proved to be process input elements, and are the ones that most strongly impact others. Finally, we highlight that elements that punish customers are much less effective than elements that benefit them.  Contribuicoes – The model was able to insert core elements of RM, but absent from most formal models: CLV and customization. The analysis allowed us to understand the interactions between the RM elements and how the end result of RM (CLV) is formed. This understanding improves knowledge on the subject and helps guide, assess and correct actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V17I58.2692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V17I58.2692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本研究试图建立一个认知模型,表达营销专业人员如何理解定义关系营销(RM)的构念之间的关系。它还试图利用所获得的模型来理解如何实现这一领域的目标。Metodo -通过认知映射,我们追踪了35个个体的心理映射,突出了每个受访者如何理解RM元素之间的相互作用。基于这些人的观点,我们建立了一个综合的心理地图。本课题是基于文献综述,探讨RM的概念和它的主要元素。在此综述的基础上,我们列出了11个主要构念。结果:我们建立了一个表示RM结构模型的聚合心理图。模型分析表明,CLV被理解为RM的最终结果。我们还观察到,大多数RM因素对CLV的影响是由忠诚度中介的。另一方面,个性化和质量被证明是过程输入元素,并且是最强烈影响其他元素的元素。最后,我们强调惩罚客户的元素远不如使客户受益的元素有效。贡献——该模型能够插入RM的核心元素,但大多数正式模型都没有:CLV和定制。分析使我们能够理解RM元素之间的相互作用,以及RM (CLV)的最终结果是如何形成的。这种理解提高了对主题的认识,并有助于指导、评估和纠正行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship Marketing results: proposition of a cognitive mapping model
Objetivo – This research sought to develop a cognitive model that expresses how marketing professionals understand the relationship between the constructs that define relationship marketing (RM). It also tried to understand, using the obtained model, how objectives in this field are achieved.  Metodo – Through cognitive mapping, we traced 35 individual mental maps, highlighting how each respondent understands the interactions between RM elements. Based on the views of these individuals, we established an aggregate mental map.  Fundamentacao teorica - The topic is based on a literature review that explores the RM concept and its main elements. Based on this review, we listed eleven main constructs.  Resultados – We established an aggregate mental map that represents the RM structural model. Model analysis identified that CLV is understood as the final result of RM. We also observed that the impact of most of the RM elements on CLV is brokered by loyalty. Personalization and quality, on the other hand, proved to be process input elements, and are the ones that most strongly impact others. Finally, we highlight that elements that punish customers are much less effective than elements that benefit them.  Contribuicoes – The model was able to insert core elements of RM, but absent from most formal models: CLV and customization. The analysis allowed us to understand the interactions between the RM elements and how the end result of RM (CLV) is formed. This understanding improves knowledge on the subject and helps guide, assess and correct actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perception of organizational justice and home office work performance: influence of affective commitment Testing the contributions of outside directors: should family firms respond differently? Exploring hidden topics on hotel Facebook fan pages before and during the COVID-19 crisis Micro-entrepreneurs in the creative industry: how resilience overcomes the impacts of the pandemic Antecedents and consequences of brand tribes in sports organizations:the role of brand personality dimensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1