关于马德里和那不勒斯之间的西班牙总督

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY STUDI STORICI Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.7375/96966
F. Bouza
{"title":"关于马德里和那不勒斯之间的西班牙总督","authors":"F. Bouza","doi":"10.7375/96966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over half a century, the late Rosario Villari deeply marked the debates about the Spanish Viceroyalty in Naples during the Early Modern period. His work in fact helped to better understand both the general history of the Hispanic Monarchy and the particular one of the Kingdom of Naples. This article aims to review the main contributions by Villari to the current debate on the Spanish viceroys in Naples, with very special attention to Osuna (1616-1620) and Medina de las Torres (1637-1644). The action of viceroys is considered in terms of political struggle, noble learning, viceregal majesty on display, and personal and community memoirs between Madrid and Naples.","PeriodicalId":44500,"journal":{"name":"STUDI STORICI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A propósito de los virreyes españoles entre Madrid y Nápoles\",\"authors\":\"F. Bouza\",\"doi\":\"10.7375/96966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For over half a century, the late Rosario Villari deeply marked the debates about the Spanish Viceroyalty in Naples during the Early Modern period. His work in fact helped to better understand both the general history of the Hispanic Monarchy and the particular one of the Kingdom of Naples. This article aims to review the main contributions by Villari to the current debate on the Spanish viceroys in Naples, with very special attention to Osuna (1616-1620) and Medina de las Torres (1637-1644). The action of viceroys is considered in terms of political struggle, noble learning, viceregal majesty on display, and personal and community memoirs between Madrid and Naples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDI STORICI\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDI STORICI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7375/96966\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDI STORICI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7375/96966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半个多世纪以来,已故的罗萨里奥·维拉里(Rosario Villari)深深烙印在近代早期关于西班牙在那不勒斯总督权的争论中。事实上,他的工作有助于更好地理解西班牙君主制的一般历史和那不勒斯王国的特殊历史。本文旨在回顾维拉里对当前关于西班牙在那不勒斯总督的争论的主要贡献,特别关注奥苏纳(1616-1620)和麦地那·德·拉斯·托雷斯(1637-1644)。总督的行为被认为是政治斗争,高尚的学习,总督的威严的展示,个人和社区回忆录在马德里和那不勒斯之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A propósito de los virreyes españoles entre Madrid y Nápoles
For over half a century, the late Rosario Villari deeply marked the debates about the Spanish Viceroyalty in Naples during the Early Modern period. His work in fact helped to better understand both the general history of the Hispanic Monarchy and the particular one of the Kingdom of Naples. This article aims to review the main contributions by Villari to the current debate on the Spanish viceroys in Naples, with very special attention to Osuna (1616-1620) and Medina de las Torres (1637-1644). The action of viceroys is considered in terms of political struggle, noble learning, viceregal majesty on display, and personal and community memoirs between Madrid and Naples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDI STORICI
STUDI STORICI HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thirty Years after the Collapse. Does the «Short Century» still make Sense? Economic Estimates by the CIA and the Unpredictable End of the USSR From the Global Shock to the Continental Union: Recent Trends in the Historiography on Europe and European Cooperation The Control of the Treasury according to the Crown of Aragon’s Administrative Practice: the Stilum Officii Magistri Racionaliis during the First Half of the Fifteenth Century The Uniform and the Burnous: Colonial Troops and Irregular Units in Western Libya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1