超越经典:全面审视护理教育和研究中的概念分析方法。

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.2544
Joko Gunawan, Yupin Aungsuroch, Colleen Marzilli
{"title":"超越经典:全面审视护理教育和研究中的概念分析方法。","authors":"Joko Gunawan,&nbsp;Yupin Aungsuroch,&nbsp;Colleen Marzilli","doi":"10.33546/bnj.2544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This editorial presents eight concept analysis methods for use in nursing research and education. In addition to the two classical methods of Walker and Avant's and Rodgers' concept analysis approaches that are typically utilized in nursing education and briefly discussed within this editorial, six additional methods are also presented including Schwartz-Barcott and Kim's Hybrid model, Chinn and Kramer's approach, Simultaneous Concept Analysis, Pragmatic Utility, Principle-Based Concept Analysis, and Semantic Concept Analysis. By familiarizing nursing educators, researchers, and students with these methods, educators can enhance their critical thinking and understanding of complex nursing concepts, preparing them for enhanced, multi-faceted contributions to nursing science.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"9 5","pages":"406-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the classics: A comprehensive look at concept analysis methods in nursing education and research.\",\"authors\":\"Joko Gunawan,&nbsp;Yupin Aungsuroch,&nbsp;Colleen Marzilli\",\"doi\":\"10.33546/bnj.2544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This editorial presents eight concept analysis methods for use in nursing research and education. In addition to the two classical methods of Walker and Avant's and Rodgers' concept analysis approaches that are typically utilized in nursing education and briefly discussed within this editorial, six additional methods are also presented including Schwartz-Barcott and Kim's Hybrid model, Chinn and Kramer's approach, Simultaneous Concept Analysis, Pragmatic Utility, Principle-Based Concept Analysis, and Semantic Concept Analysis. By familiarizing nursing educators, researchers, and students with these methods, educators can enhance their critical thinking and understanding of complex nursing concepts, preparing them for enhanced, multi-faceted contributions to nursing science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belitung Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"406-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belitung Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇社论提出了八种概念分析方法用于护理研究和教育。除了Walker和Avant的两种经典方法以及Rodgers的概念分析方法,这两种方法通常用于护理教育,并在本社论中进行了简要讨论外,还提出了六种额外的方法,包括Schwartz-Barcott和Kim的混合模型、Chinn和Kramer的方法、同时概念分析、语用效用,基于原理的概念分析和语义概念分析。通过使护理教育工作者、研究人员和学生熟悉这些方法,教育工作者可以增强他们的批判性思维和对复杂护理概念的理解,为他们对护理科学做出更多、多方面的贡献做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the classics: A comprehensive look at concept analysis methods in nursing education and research.

This editorial presents eight concept analysis methods for use in nursing research and education. In addition to the two classical methods of Walker and Avant's and Rodgers' concept analysis approaches that are typically utilized in nursing education and briefly discussed within this editorial, six additional methods are also presented including Schwartz-Barcott and Kim's Hybrid model, Chinn and Kramer's approach, Simultaneous Concept Analysis, Pragmatic Utility, Principle-Based Concept Analysis, and Semantic Concept Analysis. By familiarizing nursing educators, researchers, and students with these methods, educators can enhance their critical thinking and understanding of complex nursing concepts, preparing them for enhanced, multi-faceted contributions to nursing science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of health workers in primary health facilities in implementing obstetric emergency referrals to save women from death in Indonesia: A qualitative study. Elements of a nurse-coordinated post-stroke home care rehabilitation in the Philippines: A cross-sectional study. Exploring patients' perspectives on healthcare service quality in outpatient settings at a public hospital in Palembang, Indonesia: A qualitative study. Factors affecting quality of life among older adults with hypertension in Wenzhou, China: A cross-sectional study. Lower accuracy of estimated delivery date using last menstrual period recall and related factors of adverse events during childbirth: A sub-analysis of a birth cohort study in Makassar, Indonesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1