慢性咳嗽系统检查框架的引入:临床环境中的前后队列研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-31 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026
Allan Klitgaard, Anders Løkke, Jannie Frølund, Steffen Kristensen, Ole Hilberg
{"title":"慢性咳嗽系统检查框架的引入:临床环境中的前后队列研究。","authors":"Allan Klitgaard,&nbsp;Anders Løkke,&nbsp;Jannie Frølund,&nbsp;Steffen Kristensen,&nbsp;Ole Hilberg","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1-2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592-0.859), <i>P</i> = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"2273026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting.\",\"authors\":\"Allan Klitgaard,&nbsp;Anders Løkke,&nbsp;Jannie Frølund,&nbsp;Steffen Kristensen,&nbsp;Ole Hilberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1-2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592-0.859), <i>P</i> = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2273026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621243/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

咳嗽是一种由多种不同机制引起的疾病。有许多诊断咳嗽原因的指南,但构建良好的检查框架的效果尚未得到调查。在Vejle Lillebelt医院内科,介绍了一种诊断咳嗽的系统检查框架。连续200名因咳嗽而转诊到肺部门诊的患者也包括在内。前100名患者(第1组)在实施检查框架之前被纳入,并像往常一样进行诊断。接下来的100名患者(第2组)使用系统框架进行检查。主要终点是确定诊断所需的预约次数。进行多变量泊松回归,调整年龄、性别、体重指数、肺功能(FEV1/FVC)、咳嗽持续时间和吸烟状况。第一组47%的患者在1-2次就诊中确诊,而第二组为83%。当对混杂因素进行调整时,第2组需要更少的预约来确定诊断(发病率比率 = 0.713(95%置信区间:0.592-0.859),P = 0.000)。使用系统的检查框架来诊断咳嗽可以减少确定诊断所需的预约次数,似乎不会影响诊断结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting.

Cough is a condition that can be caused by several different mechanisms. There are numerous guidelines for diagnosing the cause of cough, yet the effect of a well-constructed examination framework has not been investigated. At the Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough was introduced. Two hundred consecutive patients referred to the pulmonary outpatient clinic with cough were included. The first 100 patients (Group 1) were included before implementation of the examination framework and diagnosed as usual. The next 100 patients (Group 2) were examined using the systematic framework. The primary endpoint was the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis. A multivariable Poisson regression was performed, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), duration of cough, and smoking status. A diagnosis was established within 1-2 visits in 47% in Group 1 compared to 83% in Group 2. When adjusting for confounders, fewer appointments was required to establish a diagnosis in Group 2 (Incidence rate ratio = 0.713 (95% confidence interval: 0.592-0.859), P = 0.000). Using a systematic examination framework for diagnosing cough may reduce the number of appointments required to establish a diagnosis, seemingly without compromising the diagnostic outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self evaluation of breathing questionnaire (SEBQ) into Danish. Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study. Socioeconomic status and emergency department visits in adults with a history of severe childhood asthma: a register-based study. Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1