行政负担框架:社会工作研究与实践的新视野?

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Social work Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1093/sw/swad037
Noam Tarshish
{"title":"行政负担框架:社会工作研究与实践的新视野?","authors":"Noam Tarshish","doi":"10.1093/sw/swad037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social work is widely recognized as a human rights profession. The commitment to protect and advocate for social and economic rights has been incorporated into official definitions and codes of ethics of the profession globally, undergirding social work models and services. However, despite the overwhelming recognition of the importance of social work advocacy, a unified framework for research and practice has not been agreed upon, and new challenges to welfare states have somewhat contested the existing, primarily European advocacy framework built on the literature on take-up of social and economic rights. The purpose of this integrative context review is to introduce the administrative burden (AB) literature as a potential framework for meeting social work advocacy challenges by emphasizing a subjective viewpoint, a multifaceted understanding of the bureaucratic encounter, and the secondary effects of burden. The article concludes by identifying directions for future research and practice concerning the nexus between AB and social work.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":" ","pages":"86-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Administrative Burden Framework: A New Horizon for Research and Practice in Social Work?\",\"authors\":\"Noam Tarshish\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sw/swad037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social work is widely recognized as a human rights profession. The commitment to protect and advocate for social and economic rights has been incorporated into official definitions and codes of ethics of the profession globally, undergirding social work models and services. However, despite the overwhelming recognition of the importance of social work advocacy, a unified framework for research and practice has not been agreed upon, and new challenges to welfare states have somewhat contested the existing, primarily European advocacy framework built on the literature on take-up of social and economic rights. The purpose of this integrative context review is to introduce the administrative burden (AB) literature as a potential framework for meeting social work advocacy challenges by emphasizing a subjective viewpoint, a multifaceted understanding of the bureaucratic encounter, and the secondary effects of burden. The article concludes by identifying directions for future research and practice concerning the nexus between AB and social work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social work\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"86-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad037\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会工作被广泛认为是一种人权职业。保护和倡导社会和经济权利的承诺已纳入全球职业道德的官方定义和准则,为社会工作模式和服务奠定了基础。然而,尽管社会工作倡导的重要性得到了压倒性的承认,但尚未就统一的研究和实践框架达成一致,福利国家面临的新挑战在一定程度上对现有的、主要是建立在接受社会和经济权利文献基础上的欧洲倡导框架提出了质疑。本综合背景综述的目的是通过强调主观观点、对官僚遭遇的多方面理解以及负担的次要影响,将行政负担(AB)文献作为应对社会工作倡导挑战的潜在框架。文章最后确定了AB与社会工作之间关系的未来研究和实践方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Administrative Burden Framework: A New Horizon for Research and Practice in Social Work?

Social work is widely recognized as a human rights profession. The commitment to protect and advocate for social and economic rights has been incorporated into official definitions and codes of ethics of the profession globally, undergirding social work models and services. However, despite the overwhelming recognition of the importance of social work advocacy, a unified framework for research and practice has not been agreed upon, and new challenges to welfare states have somewhat contested the existing, primarily European advocacy framework built on the literature on take-up of social and economic rights. The purpose of this integrative context review is to introduce the administrative burden (AB) literature as a potential framework for meeting social work advocacy challenges by emphasizing a subjective viewpoint, a multifaceted understanding of the bureaucratic encounter, and the secondary effects of burden. The article concludes by identifying directions for future research and practice concerning the nexus between AB and social work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Professional Self-Care in Social Work Practice: A New Conceptual Framework. Preventing Firearm Injuries and Deaths among Clients: An Action Plan Model for Social Workers. Social Work, Harm Reduction, and Substance Use: Progress, Policy, and Perseverance. How Academic Social Workers Negotiate Their Direct Practice Skills and Qualitative Research Techniques. Regional Differences in Job Satisfaction among Chinese Social Workers: The Mediating Effect of Attitudinal Professionalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1