不同父母教育方式下足月前和足月婴儿的毛运动轨迹。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Child Health Care Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1177/13674935231211954
Anilsa Suraia Pedro Gaspar Francisco, Maylli Daiani Graciosa, Sheila Cristina da Silva Pacheco, Luciana Sayuri Sanada
{"title":"不同父母教育方式下足月前和足月婴儿的毛运动轨迹。","authors":"Anilsa Suraia Pedro Gaspar Francisco,&nbsp;Maylli Daiani Graciosa,&nbsp;Sheila Cristina da Silva Pacheco,&nbsp;Luciana Sayuri Sanada","doi":"10.1177/13674935231211954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore motor trajectories of Brazilian pre-term and full-term infants from 3 to 12 months old whose parents participated in an educational program and had received guidance on gross motor development. Forty-eight Brazilian infants aged 3 months old were divided into Group 1 (full-term infants and their parents who received only verbal guidance, <i>n</i> = 14), Group 2 (full-term infants with parents who received an educative folder in addition to the same verbal guidance, <i>n</i> = 23), and Group 3 (preterm infants with parents who received the same verbal guidance and educative folder, <i>n</i> = 11). The folder had similar information to the verbal guidance; nonetheless, it helped to teach parents and allowed later consultation at home. We applied Alberta Infant Motor Scale, Affordances in Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale, and a questionnaire about infants' information at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months old. In longitudinal comparison, all groups showed a significant difference for AIMS variables on total score and subscales; all subitems of AHEMD-IS; and time spent in prone, supine, sitting, and standing positions. In general, no differences were found between groups. Motor trajectory, home opportunities, and parental positioning practices were similar between full-term and preterm infants with different guidance approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gross motor trajectories of pre-term and full-term infants under different parental educational approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Anilsa Suraia Pedro Gaspar Francisco,&nbsp;Maylli Daiani Graciosa,&nbsp;Sheila Cristina da Silva Pacheco,&nbsp;Luciana Sayuri Sanada\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13674935231211954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to explore motor trajectories of Brazilian pre-term and full-term infants from 3 to 12 months old whose parents participated in an educational program and had received guidance on gross motor development. Forty-eight Brazilian infants aged 3 months old were divided into Group 1 (full-term infants and their parents who received only verbal guidance, <i>n</i> = 14), Group 2 (full-term infants with parents who received an educative folder in addition to the same verbal guidance, <i>n</i> = 23), and Group 3 (preterm infants with parents who received the same verbal guidance and educative folder, <i>n</i> = 11). The folder had similar information to the verbal guidance; nonetheless, it helped to teach parents and allowed later consultation at home. We applied Alberta Infant Motor Scale, Affordances in Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale, and a questionnaire about infants' information at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months old. In longitudinal comparison, all groups showed a significant difference for AIMS variables on total score and subscales; all subitems of AHEMD-IS; and time spent in prone, supine, sitting, and standing positions. In general, no differences were found between groups. Motor trajectory, home opportunities, and parental positioning practices were similar between full-term and preterm infants with different guidance approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935231211954\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935231211954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探索巴西3至12个月大的早产儿和足月婴儿的运动轨迹,这些婴儿的父母参加了一项教育计划,并接受了毛运动发育指导。48名3个月大的巴西婴儿被分为第1组(仅接受口头指导的足月婴儿及其父母,n=14)、第2组(除接受相同口头指导外,还接受教育文件夹的足月婴儿,n=23)和第3组(父母接受相同口头指导和教育文件夹的早产儿,n=11)。文件夹中有与口头指导类似的信息;尽管如此,它还是有助于教育家长,并允许以后在家咨询。我们应用了艾伯塔省婴儿运动量表、运动发育家庭环境中的承受能力婴儿量表,以及一份关于3、6、9和12个月大婴儿信息的问卷。在纵向比较中,所有组的AIMS变量在总分和分量表上都有显著差异;AHEMD-IS的所有子项;以及俯卧、仰卧、坐姿和站姿的时间。总体而言,各组之间没有发现差异。不同指导方法的足月和早产儿的运动轨迹、家庭机会和父母定位实践相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gross motor trajectories of pre-term and full-term infants under different parental educational approaches.

This study aimed to explore motor trajectories of Brazilian pre-term and full-term infants from 3 to 12 months old whose parents participated in an educational program and had received guidance on gross motor development. Forty-eight Brazilian infants aged 3 months old were divided into Group 1 (full-term infants and their parents who received only verbal guidance, n = 14), Group 2 (full-term infants with parents who received an educative folder in addition to the same verbal guidance, n = 23), and Group 3 (preterm infants with parents who received the same verbal guidance and educative folder, n = 11). The folder had similar information to the verbal guidance; nonetheless, it helped to teach parents and allowed later consultation at home. We applied Alberta Infant Motor Scale, Affordances in Home Environment for Motor Development-Infant Scale, and a questionnaire about infants' information at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months old. In longitudinal comparison, all groups showed a significant difference for AIMS variables on total score and subscales; all subitems of AHEMD-IS; and time spent in prone, supine, sitting, and standing positions. In general, no differences were found between groups. Motor trajectory, home opportunities, and parental positioning practices were similar between full-term and preterm infants with different guidance approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Why are we still doing sucrose trials for newborns? Experiences of siblings and parents of children with congenital heart disease and exploration of siblings' support needs. Mothers' experience seeking healthcare advice for their unsettled infants in Victoria, Australia. Factors that support children and young people to express their views and to have them heard in healthcare: An inductive qualitative content analysis. Goals of Morbidity and Mortality meetings in paediatric acute care. A qualitative case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1