体外灌注系统中血管内鞘管装置亲水性聚合物栓塞的评价。

Q3 Medicine JVS-vascular science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100127
Alexa Mordhorst MD , Gary K. Yang MD, PhD , Nicholas Reitsma BHK , Jerry C. Chen MD , Bei Yuan Zhang MD, MPH , Sahib Suri BMLSc , Joel Gagnon MD
{"title":"体外灌注系统中血管内鞘管装置亲水性聚合物栓塞的评价。","authors":"Alexa Mordhorst MD ,&nbsp;Gary K. Yang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Reitsma BHK ,&nbsp;Jerry C. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Bei Yuan Zhang MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Sahib Suri BMLSc ,&nbsp;Joel Gagnon MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore &amp; Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74035,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular science","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Mordhorst MD ,&nbsp;Gary K. Yang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Reitsma BHK ,&nbsp;Jerry C. Chen MD ,&nbsp;Bei Yuan Zhang MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Sahib Suri BMLSc ,&nbsp;Joel Gagnon MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore &amp; Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10624583/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350323000317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350323000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:病例报告、组织病理学和尸检表明,旨在提高血管内输送能力和最大限度地减少血管创伤的亲水性聚合物涂层可能会栓塞,并与缺血、梗死和死亡等不良后果有关。这项研究试图确定亲水性聚合物是否在受控的体外环境中脱落市售鞘,并假设涂层鞘和未涂层鞘(对照)之间存在显著差异。方法:在体外环境中测试每个制造商的六个鞘管,包括Zenith Alpha腹部血管内支架移植物(Cook Medical)、DrySeal鞘管(W.L.Gore&Associates)和Sentrant Introducer鞘管(Medtronic)。对照组采用非涂层Check-Flo导管鞘(Cook Medical)。每个测试回路以3L/min的输出运行150分钟,然后排出回路并收集流体。定量分析包括称量干燥的滤纸,并使用粒度光散射来量化粒度和计数。衰减全反射光谱也被使用。结果:与对照鞘相比,三个涂层鞘中的每一个都有显著更大的脱落。Cook Zenithα鞘的残留物重量(2.87±0.52 mg/L)明显高于Gore DrySeal鞘(1.07±0.06 mg/L)和美敦力Sentrant导管鞘(0.98±0.14 mg/L)。涂层鞘和未涂层鞘(对照)之间的平均粒径没有显著差异。衰减全反射光谱法在Cook Zenith Alpha和Medtronic Sentrant样品中鉴定出鞘状颗粒。结论:与对照组相比,所有三种市售亲水性鞘中都存在聚合物栓塞,且栓塞程度明显更高。需要进一步研究这些发现的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of hydrophilic polymer embolization from endovascular sheath devices in an in vitro perfusion system

Objective

Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found.

Methods

Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used.

Results

Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples.

Conclusions

Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Toll-Like Receptor 4, a potential therapeutic target of lower limb ischemic myopathy that raises further questions Role of Toll-like Receptor 4 in Skeletal Muscle Damage in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Predicting Future Occlusion or Stenosis of Lower Extremity Bypass Grafts Using Artificial Intelligence to Simultaneously Analyze All Flow Velocities Collected in Current and Previous Ultrasound Exams A central arteriovenous fistula reduces systemic hypertension in a mouse model Systematic review and meta-analysis of the genetics of peripheral arterial disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1