造影剂时间、体积和流速对CTA肺动脉图像质量的影响。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2023-11-01
Heiner Nebelung, Willi Tröger, Ivan Platzek, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Verena Plodeck
{"title":"造影剂时间、体积和流速对CTA肺动脉图像质量的影响。","authors":"Heiner Nebelung, Willi Tröger, Ivan Platzek, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Verena Plodeck","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of contrast timing, contrast volume, and contrast flow rate on the image quality of pulmonary arteries in computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to assess if bolus-tracking region of interest (ROI) positioning in the left atrium, which is used for triple-rule-out CTA, allows for sufficient depiction of the pulmonary arteries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, data were collected for patients who underwent thoracic CTA during a specific period. Two groups of 121 patients each were created based on bolus-tracking ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery or left atrium using propensity score matching. Image quality of the pulmonary arteries was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative scores. Subgroups were formed to examine the influence of contrast volume and flow rate. Two radiologists determined if pulmonary embolism was present, if pulmonary embolism could be excluded with certainty, and from which level pulmonary embolism could be excluded with certainty. Interrater reliability also was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery scored significantly higher compared with the left atrium. There was no significant difference in subgroups of patients who were examined with 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate; scores were similar or better than in the overall study population. Pulmonary embolism was not able to be excluded with certainty for each 1 patient in these subgroups compared with a high percentage in the overall study population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ROI positioning in the left atrium in combination with the 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate does not adversely affect depiction of the pulmonary arteries compared with conventional ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When using 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate, ROI positioning in the left atrium, which is used in triple-rule-out CTA, is sufficient for the assessment of pulmonary arteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Contrast Timing, Volume, and Flow Rate on Image Quality of Pulmonary Arteries in CTA.\",\"authors\":\"Heiner Nebelung, Willi Tröger, Ivan Platzek, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Verena Plodeck\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of contrast timing, contrast volume, and contrast flow rate on the image quality of pulmonary arteries in computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to assess if bolus-tracking region of interest (ROI) positioning in the left atrium, which is used for triple-rule-out CTA, allows for sufficient depiction of the pulmonary arteries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, data were collected for patients who underwent thoracic CTA during a specific period. Two groups of 121 patients each were created based on bolus-tracking ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery or left atrium using propensity score matching. Image quality of the pulmonary arteries was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative scores. Subgroups were formed to examine the influence of contrast volume and flow rate. Two radiologists determined if pulmonary embolism was present, if pulmonary embolism could be excluded with certainty, and from which level pulmonary embolism could be excluded with certainty. Interrater reliability also was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery scored significantly higher compared with the left atrium. There was no significant difference in subgroups of patients who were examined with 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate; scores were similar or better than in the overall study population. Pulmonary embolism was not able to be excluded with certainty for each 1 patient in these subgroups compared with a high percentage in the overall study population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ROI positioning in the left atrium in combination with the 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate does not adversely affect depiction of the pulmonary arteries compared with conventional ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When using 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate, ROI positioning in the left atrium, which is used in triple-rule-out CTA, is sufficient for the assessment of pulmonary arteries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologic Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估对比时间、对比体积和对比流速对计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)中肺动脉图像质量的影响,并评估用于三重排除CTA的左心房推注跟踪感兴趣区域(ROI)定位是否能够充分描绘肺动脉。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,收集了在特定时期接受胸部CTA的患者的数据。基于使用倾向评分匹配在主肺动脉或左心房中的推注跟踪ROI定位,创建两组,每组121名患者。使用定量和定性评分来评估肺动脉的图像质量。分组检查造影剂体积和流速的影响。两名放射科医生确定了是否存在肺栓塞,是否可以确定地排除肺栓塞,以及可以确定地从哪个级别排除肺栓塞。还评估了询问机的可靠性。结果:与左心房相比,主肺动脉的ROI定位得分明显更高。在造影剂体积大于或等于60mL、流速小于4mL/s的患者亚组中没有显著差异;得分与整个研究人群相似或更好。与总体研究人群中的高比例相比,这些亚组中每1名患者的肺栓塞不能被确定排除。讨论:与传统的主肺动脉ROI定位相比,左心房ROI定位与60mL或更大的造影剂体积和小于4mL/s的流速相结合不会对肺动脉的描绘产生不利影响。结论:当使用60mL或更大的造影剂体积和小于4mL/s的流速时,用于三排除CTA的左心房ROI定位足以评估肺动脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Contrast Timing, Volume, and Flow Rate on Image Quality of Pulmonary Arteries in CTA.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of contrast timing, contrast volume, and contrast flow rate on the image quality of pulmonary arteries in computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to assess if bolus-tracking region of interest (ROI) positioning in the left atrium, which is used for triple-rule-out CTA, allows for sufficient depiction of the pulmonary arteries.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, data were collected for patients who underwent thoracic CTA during a specific period. Two groups of 121 patients each were created based on bolus-tracking ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery or left atrium using propensity score matching. Image quality of the pulmonary arteries was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative scores. Subgroups were formed to examine the influence of contrast volume and flow rate. Two radiologists determined if pulmonary embolism was present, if pulmonary embolism could be excluded with certainty, and from which level pulmonary embolism could be excluded with certainty. Interrater reliability also was evaluated.

Results: ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery scored significantly higher compared with the left atrium. There was no significant difference in subgroups of patients who were examined with 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate; scores were similar or better than in the overall study population. Pulmonary embolism was not able to be excluded with certainty for each 1 patient in these subgroups compared with a high percentage in the overall study population.

Discussion: ROI positioning in the left atrium in combination with the 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate does not adversely affect depiction of the pulmonary arteries compared with conventional ROI positioning in the main pulmonary artery.

Conclusion: When using 60 mL or more contrast volume and less than 4 mL/s flow rate, ROI positioning in the left atrium, which is used in triple-rule-out CTA, is sufficient for the assessment of pulmonary arteries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Types, Causes, and Levels of Radiologic Technologist Burnout During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Benchmarking for Success. Beyond Cardiac Output for Vessel Opacification in Computed Tomography. Cardiac CT: Assessing Anatomy, Physiology, And Plaque Formation. Deep Learning Reconstruction in Abdominopelvic Contrast-Enhanced CT for The Evaluation of Hemorrhages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1