初级卫生中心非专业人员领导的团体心理治疗后抑郁症的12个月轨迹:来自越南的案例研究

Mai Tuyet Do , Tam Thanh Nguyen , Huong Thi Thanh Tran
{"title":"初级卫生中心非专业人员领导的团体心理治疗后抑郁症的12个月轨迹:来自越南的案例研究","authors":"Mai Tuyet Do ,&nbsp;Tam Thanh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Huong Thi Thanh Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Depression is a top prevalent mental illness but has low care access globally. Community-based interventions were considered to be effective for depression with scarce resources.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study evaluated depression after group psychotherapy in primary settings in Vietnam for up to 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasiexperimental study including a single-arm, pre- and post intervention assessment was conducted among 359 people aged 18–65 (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) from August 2020 to January 2022 in 10 communes of Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. The PHQ-9 scores were collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The trained nonspecialists delivered 8 sessions of group therapy under supervision.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Three hundred fifty-nine eligible people participated in the intervention, and three and two people dropped out after three months and six months, respectively. The mean PHQ-9 score decreased from 13.29 preintervention to 2.83 after 12 months. The difference in depression severity between the three points of follow-up was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). Ninety percent of participants achieved reliable improvement, and 96% recovered at 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Community-based psychotherapy can be a promising approach to depression management in limited settings in the long term, which needs further study to evaluate its acceptance and feasibility in a specific context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twelve-month trajectories of depression after group-based psychotherapy led by nonspecialists at primary health centers: A case study from Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Mai Tuyet Do ,&nbsp;Tam Thanh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Huong Thi Thanh Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbct.2023.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Depression is a top prevalent mental illness but has low care access globally. Community-based interventions were considered to be effective for depression with scarce resources.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study evaluated depression after group psychotherapy in primary settings in Vietnam for up to 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasiexperimental study including a single-arm, pre- and post intervention assessment was conducted among 359 people aged 18–65 (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) from August 2020 to January 2022 in 10 communes of Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. The PHQ-9 scores were collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The trained nonspecialists delivered 8 sessions of group therapy under supervision.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Three hundred fifty-nine eligible people participated in the intervention, and three and two people dropped out after three months and six months, respectively. The mean PHQ-9 score decreased from 13.29 preintervention to 2.83 after 12 months. The difference in depression severity between the three points of follow-up was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). Ninety percent of participants achieved reliable improvement, and 96% recovered at 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Community-based psychotherapy can be a promising approach to depression management in limited settings in the long term, which needs further study to evaluate its acceptance and feasibility in a specific context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 169-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979123000239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979123000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁症是一种最常见的精神疾病,但在全球范围内获得护理的机会很少。以社区为基础的干预措施被认为在资源匮乏的情况下对抑郁症有效。目的本研究评估了在越南初级环境中进行团体心理治疗长达12个月的抑郁症。方法2020年8月至2022年1月,在越南泰阮省10个社区的359名18-65岁(PHQ-9分≥10)人群中进行了一项准实验研究,包括单臂、干预前和干预后评估。PHQ-9评分在基线和3、6和12个月后收集。经过培训的非专业人员在监督下进行了8次集体治疗。结果359名符合条件的人参加了干预,3个月和6个月后分别有3人和2人退出。平均PHQ-9评分从干预前的13.29分下降到12个月后的2.83分。三个随访点之间抑郁症严重程度的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。90%的参与者获得了可靠的改善,96%的参与者在12个月时康复。结论从长远来看,基于社区的心理治疗在有限的环境中是一种很有前途的抑郁症管理方法,需要进一步研究,以评估其在特定背景下的接受度和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Twelve-month trajectories of depression after group-based psychotherapy led by nonspecialists at primary health centers: A case study from Vietnam

Introduction

Depression is a top prevalent mental illness but has low care access globally. Community-based interventions were considered to be effective for depression with scarce resources.

Purpose

This study evaluated depression after group psychotherapy in primary settings in Vietnam for up to 12 months.

Method

A quasiexperimental study including a single-arm, pre- and post intervention assessment was conducted among 359 people aged 18–65 (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) from August 2020 to January 2022 in 10 communes of Thai Nguyen Province, Vietnam. The PHQ-9 scores were collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The trained nonspecialists delivered 8 sessions of group therapy under supervision.

Result

Three hundred fifty-nine eligible people participated in the intervention, and three and two people dropped out after three months and six months, respectively. The mean PHQ-9 score decreased from 13.29 preintervention to 2.83 after 12 months. The difference in depression severity between the three points of follow-up was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Ninety percent of participants achieved reliable improvement, and 96% recovered at 12 months.

Conclusion

Community-based psychotherapy can be a promising approach to depression management in limited settings in the long term, which needs further study to evaluate its acceptance and feasibility in a specific context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
The Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ): Development of a brief version and validation of a French adaptation Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff Analyzing data in single-case experimental designs: Objectives and available software options The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health problems of children and adolescents in child protection system: A meta-analysis Assessing user acceptance of a mental health app & its impact on depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder related knowledge: A mixed method experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1